Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Response to A-CHAMP Questionnaire

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

> 6. What will you do to assure that health insurers pay for promising new

treatments

and behavioral therapy?

>

> Our health care system is predominantly fee-for-service: providers are paid

for each

treatment, regardless of its necessity or quality. For example, a hospital that

makes a

medical error is often paid for the error and then paid again to fix it. Our

system should

pay for results, rewarding better, more efficient care.

>

> As part of my proposal to transform our health care system and guarantee

quality,

affordable health care for every American, Medicare, my new Health Care Markets

and

other government programs will lead the way by paying higher rates to plans and

providers that provide the very best care and penalizing plans that fail to meet

critical,

quantifiable goals.

This means he will let QuackWatch and the AMA decide what gets paid for and what

doesn't, which will be catastrophic.

Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So who is the best candidate for our kids? They seem to all tells us

what we want to hear. The answers are genetic and very diplomatic, but

who do we trust?

Zurama

>

> A-CHAMP just received responses to our candidates questionnaire from

which are posted below. We have also received responses

from Senator Biden and Senator Obama which you can read at the A-CHAMP

website, www.a-champ.org. Please feel free to distribute to anyone,

anywhere, anyhow.

>

> 1. Will you fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education

Act?

>

> Education is America's sturdiest ladder of opportunity, but for

many of the more than 5 million school-age children with disabilities,

that ladder is missing several rungs. With IDEA, Congress made a

commitment to America's children. Having a disability should not

stand in the way of a child receiving a quality education in the least

restrictive setting. But the federal government has not lived up to

its responsibilities, funding less than half its share.

>

> I support a steady path toward fully funding the federal share of

special education costs and will enforce the right to receive a free

and appropriate education in schools that are fully accessible –

starting with quality early childhood education that is inclusive of

all children, regardless of disability or their learning style, and

continuing with individualized education programs when requested and

classroom materials and technology that are accessible to all

students. Additionally, child care providers need training to help

them recognize when additional services might be needed and where

those community resources are.

>

> I have repeatedly voted to fully fund special education and to

make the funding mandatory, and I oppose efforts to roll back key

provisions of IDEA. It is time that children with disabilities

receive the quality education they deserve.

>

>

> 2. Do you believe that the Combating Autism Act provides enough

money to find the cause, or causes, of autism and effective treatments?

>

> While Congress took an important step last year by dedicating more

than $900 million to address autism over the next five years, more can

and must be done. Resources for research should be a central part of

future autism initiatives.

>

>

> 3. How much funding will you request to study potential

environmental triggers of autism?

>

> As president, I will issue an all-hands-on deck research challenge

and dedicate the needed resources to unravel autism's mysteries and

follow wherever the science takes us.

>

>

> 4. Do you believe there is an autism epidemic in the United States?

>

> Autism and autism spectrum disorders affect an astonishing one in

150 children. More children than ever before – a 700 percent increase

over the last decade – are being classified as having an autism

spectrum disorder. I believe that we must learn more about why the

number of children diagnosed with autism and autism spectrum disorders

has been growing.

>

>

> 5. What will you do to stop health insurers from discriminating

against people with autism and their families?

>

> I will require insurers to keep plans open to everyone and charge

fair premiums, regardless of preexisting conditions, medical history,

and other characteristics. No longer will insurance companies be able

to game the system to cover only healthy people. Several states –

including New Jersey, New York, and Washington – have led the way on

similar community rating and guaranteed issue reforms. In addition,

new national standards will ensure that all health insurance policies

offer preventive and chronic care with minimal cost-sharing.

>

>

> 6. What will you do to assure that health insurers pay for

promising new treatments and behavioral therapy?

>

> Our health care system is predominantly fee-for-service: providers

are paid for each treatment, regardless of its necessity or quality.

For example, a hospital that makes a medical error is often paid for

the error and then paid again to fix it. Our system should pay for

results, rewarding better, more efficient care.

>

> As part of my proposal to transform our health care system and

guarantee quality, affordable health care for every American,

Medicare, my new Health Care Markets and other government programs

will lead the way by paying higher rates to plans and providers that

provide the very best care and penalizing plans that fail to meet

critical, quantifiable goals.

>

> Only a small fraction — likely less than 0.1 percent — of each

health care dollar is currently devoted to systematic research and

assessment of the comparative effectiveness of various diagnostic and

therapeutic options. I will establish a non-profit or public

organization – possibly within the Institutes of Medicine – to

research the best methods of providing care, drawing upon data from

Medicare, Health Care Markets and medical experts from across the

nation. It will test devices and drugs head-to-head to see which work

best and for whom. This new organization will quickly and widely

disseminate its unbiased, scientific findings to physicians and patients.

>

> Though we have some of the best health care technology in the

world, effective new treatments can take years to be widely adopted.

For example, until recently, many patients did not receive beta

blockers after heart attacks even though they are cheap and highly

effective. Similarly, doctors sometimes prescribe name brand drugs

despite the availability of equally effective, less expensive generic

drugs. As new diagnostics, procedures and drugs are introduced, my

new objective medical research organization will help doctors make

sense of what works best. Government programs will offer incentives

for the use of evidence-based care and treatments.

>

>

> 7. Do you think vaccines should be investigated as a possible

cause of autism?

>

> We need to step up our research efforts to find the causes of

autism, as well as better treatments. And that research must be

transparent, accountable, open to all possibilities and driven by

science.

>

>

> 8. What will you do to protect Americans, especially young

children and pregnant women, from exposure to mercury through vaccines?

>

> I will take all necessary steps to make sure that vaccines are as

safe as possible. We must discontinue the use of potentially

dangerous additives, including mercury, in vaccines.

>

>

> 9. What will you do to provide for the lifetime care that 250,000

to 500,000 current children with autism will need in the future?

>

> Government education services for people with disabilities end at

age 21, even though the need does not, especially for many of those

with autism. Thus, families are left to care for their adult children

with disabilities largely on their own. I will work to develop

ongoing adult education and vocational and recreational programs for

those with autism. My plans for reforming the U.S. Department of

Housing and Urban Development and strengthening federal housing policy

will expand the supply of affordable supportive housing for people

with disabilities, including adults living with autism.

>

>

> 10. Would you support a large-scale federal study of the

differences in health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups?

>

> As president, I will direct my Secretary of Health and Human

Services and my Directors of the Centers for Disease Control and

National Institutes of Health to follow where science takes us and to

determine which studies to undertake based on scientific evidence.

>

>

> 11. Would you support a federal right for families and individuals

to choose for themselves which vaccines they will use?

>

> I support efforts to ensure the safety of America's vaccines and

to educate families and health care providers about vaccine options.

>

>

> 12. Are you satisfied that the federal vaccine approval process is

free of conflicts of interests, transparent and rigorous?

>

> Drug companies responsible for testing drugs prior to FDA approval

have an inherent conflict of interest between their desire to profit

from new treatments and the public's interest in ensuring safety and

efficacy. I will move toward requiring fully independent testing of

drugs, including the testing of drugs compared to existing

alternatives. Information about comparative effectiveness would be

required to be made available to the FDA and to the public.

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish people would remove "wherever the science takes us" from their vocabulary. Whose science are they talking about? Maurine Gilmore <yogilmore@...> wrote: A-CHAMP just received responses to our candidates questionnaire from which are posted below. We have also received responses from Senator Biden and Senator Obama which you can read at the A-CHAMP website, www.a-champ.org. Please feel free to distribute to anyone, anywhere, anyhow. 1. Will you fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Education is America’s sturdiest ladder of opportunity, but for many of the more than 5 million school-age children with disabilities, that ladder is missing several rungs. With IDEA, Congress made a commitment to America’s children. Having a disability should not stand in the way of a child receiving a quality education in the least restrictive setting. But the federal government

has not lived up to its responsibilities, funding less than half its share. I support a steady path toward fully funding the federal share of special education costs and will enforce the right to receive a free and appropriate education in schools that are fully accessible – starting with quality early childhood education that is inclusive of all children, regardless of disability or their learning style, and continuing with individualized education programs when requested and classroom materials and technology that are accessible to all students. Additionally, child care providers need training to help them recognize when additional services might be needed and where those community resources are. I have repeatedly voted to fully fund special education and to make the funding mandatory, and I oppose efforts to roll back key provisions of IDEA. It is time that children with disabilities receive the quality education they deserve. 2. Do you believe that the Combating Autism Act provides enough money to find the cause, or causes, of autism and effective treatments? While Congress took an important step last year by dedicating more than $900 million to address autism over the next five years, more can and must be

done. Resources for research should be a central part of future autism initiatives. 3. How much funding will you request to study potential environmental triggers of autism? As president, I will issue an all-hands-on deck research challenge and dedicate the needed resources to unravel autism’s mysteries and follow wherever the science takes us. 4. Do you believe there is an autism epidemic in the United States? Autism and autism spectrum disorders affect an astonishing one in 150 children. More children than ever before – a 700 percent increase over the last decade – are being classified as having an autism spectrum disorder. I believe that we must learn more about why the number of children diagnosed with autism and autism spectrum disorders has been growing. 5. What will you do to

stop health insurers from discriminating against people with autism and their families? I will require insurers to keep plans open to everyone and charge fair premiums, regardless of preexisting conditions, medical history, and other characteristics. No longer will insurance companies be able to game the system to cover only healthy people. Several states – including New Jersey, New York, and Washington – have led the way on similar community rating and guaranteed issue reforms. In addition, new national standards will ensure that all health insurance policies offer preventive and chronic care with minimal cost-sharing. 6. What will you do to assure that health insurers pay for promising new treatments and behavioral therapy? Our health care system is predominantly fee-for-service: providers are paid for each treatment, regardless of its necessity or quality. For example, a hospital that makes a medical error is often paid for the error and then paid again to fix it. Our system should pay for results, rewarding better, more efficient care. As part of my proposal to transform our health care system and guarantee quality, affordable health care for every American,

Medicare, my new Health Care Markets and other government programs will lead the way by paying higher rates to plans and providers that provide the very best care and penalizing plans that fail to meet critical, quantifiable goals. Only a small fraction — likely less than 0.1 percent — of each health care dollar is currently devoted to systematic research and assessment of the comparative effectiveness of various diagnostic and therapeutic options. I will establish a non-profit or public organization – possibly within the Institutes of Medicine – to research the best methods of providing care, drawing upon data from Medicare, Health Care Markets and medical experts from across the nation. It will test devices and drugs head-to-head to see which work

best and for whom. This new organization will quickly and widely disseminate its unbiased, scientific findings to physicians and patients. Though we have some of the best health care technology in the world, effective new treatments can take years to be widely adopted. For example, until recently, many patients did not receive beta blockers after heart attacks even though they are cheap and highly effective. Similarly, doctors sometimes prescribe name brand drugs despite the availability of equally effective, less expensive generic drugs. As new diagnostics, procedures and drugs are introduced, my new objective medical research organization will help doctors make sense of what works best. Government programs will

offer incentives for the use of evidence-based care and treatments. 7. Do you think vaccines should be investigated as a possible cause of autism? We need to step up our research efforts to find the causes of autism, as well as better treatments. And that research must be transparent, accountable, open to all possibilities and driven by science. 8. What will you do to protect Americans, especially young children and pregnant women, from exposure to mercury through vaccines? I will take all necessary steps to make sure that vaccines are as safe as possible. We must discontinue the use of potentially dangerous additives, including mercury, in vaccines. 9. What will you do to provide for the lifetime care that 250,000 to 500,000 current children with autism will need in the future? Government education services for people with disabilities end at age 21, even though the need does not, especially for many of those with autism. Thus, families are left to care for their adult children with disabilities largely on their own. I will work to develop ongoing adult education and vocational and recreational programs for those with autism. My plans for reforming the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and strengthening federal housing policy will expand the supply of affordable supportive housing

for people with disabilities, including adults living with autism. 10. Would you support a large-scale federal study of the differences in health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups? As president, I will direct my Secretary of Health and Human Services and my Directors of the Centers for Disease Control and National Institutes of Health to follow where science takes us and to determine which studies to undertake based on scientific evidence. 11. Would you support a federal right for families and individuals to choose for themselves which vaccines they will use? I support efforts to ensure the safety of America’s vaccines and to educate families and health care providers about vaccine options. 12. Are you satisfied that the federal vaccine approval process is free of conflicts of interests, transparent and

rigorous? Drug companies responsible for testing drugs prior to FDA approval have an inherent conflict of interest between their desire to profit from new treatments and the public’s interest in ensuring safety and efficacy. I will move toward requiring fully independent testing of drugs, including the testing of drugs compared to existing alternatives. Information about comparative effectiveness would be required to be made available to the FDA and to the public.

Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Search.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answers were okay considering he'd be dead in the water if he

answered some of those questions too directly. Unambiguous vows to

remove mercury from vaccines are in short supply.

Sigh. What we need is a crystal ball to see if promises would be kept

and if hedging is merely political stealth or lack of commitment.

> A-CHAMP just received responses to our candidates

questionnaire from which are posted below. We have also

received responses from Senator Biden and Senator Obama which you can

read at the A-CHAMP website, www.a-champ.org. Please feel free to

distribute to anyone, anywhere, anyhow.

>

> 1. Will you fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities

Education Act?

>

> Education is America's sturdiest ladder of opportunity, but for

many of the more than 5 million school-age children with

disabilities, that ladder is missing several rungs. With IDEA,

Congress made a commitment to America's children. Having a

disability should not stand in the way of a child receiving a quality

education in the least restrictive setting. But the federal

government has not lived up to its responsibilities, funding less

than half its share.

>

> I support a steady path toward fully funding the federal share of

special education costs and will enforce the right to receive a free

and appropriate education in schools that are fully accessible –

starting with quality early childhood education that is inclusive of

all children, regardless of disability or their learning style, and

continuing with individualized education programs when requested and

classroom materials and technology that are accessible to all

students. Additionally, child care providers need training to help

them recognize when additional services might be needed and where

those community resources are.

>

> I have repeatedly voted to fully fund special education and to

make the funding mandatory, and I oppose efforts to roll back key

provisions of IDEA. It is time that children with disabilities

receive the quality education they deserve.

>

>

> 2. Do you believe that the Combating Autism Act provides enough

money to find the cause, or causes, of autism and effective

treatments?

>

> While Congress took an important step last year by dedicating

more than $900 million to address autism over the next five years,

more can and must be done. Resources for research should be a

central part of future autism initiatives.

>

>

> 3. How much funding will you request to study potential

environmental triggers of autism?

>

> As president, I will issue an all-hands-on deck research

challenge and dedicate the needed resources to unravel autism's

mysteries and follow wherever the science takes us.

>

>

> 4. Do you believe there is an autism epidemic in the United

States?

>

> Autism and autism spectrum disorders affect an astonishing one in

150 children. More children than ever before – a 700 percent

increase over the last decade – are being classified as having an

autism spectrum disorder. I believe that we must learn more about why

the number of children diagnosed with autism and autism spectrum

disorders has been growing.

>

>

> 5. What will you do to stop health insurers from discriminating

against people with autism and their families?

>

> I will require insurers to keep plans open to everyone and charge

fair premiums, regardless of preexisting conditions, medical history,

and other characteristics. No longer will insurance companies be able

to game the system to cover only healthy people. Several states –

including New Jersey, New York, and Washington – have led the way on

similar community rating and guaranteed issue reforms. In addition,

new national standards will ensure that all health insurance policies

offer preventive and chronic care with minimal cost-sharing.

>

>

> 6. What will you do to assure that health insurers pay for

promising new treatments and behavioral therapy?

>

> Our health care system is predominantly fee-for-service:

providers are paid for each treatment, regardless of its necessity or

quality. For example, a hospital that makes a medical error is often

paid for the error and then paid again to fix it. Our system should

pay for results, rewarding better, more efficient care.

>

> As part of my proposal to transform our health care system and

guarantee quality, affordable health care for every American,

Medicare, my new Health Care Markets and other government programs

will lead the way by paying higher rates to plans and providers that

provide the very best care and penalizing plans that fail to meet

critical, quantifiable goals.

>

> Only a small fraction — likely less than 0.1 percent — of each

health care dollar is currently devoted to systematic research and

assessment of the comparative effectiveness of various diagnostic and

therapeutic options. I will establish a non-profit or public

organization – possibly within the Institutes of Medicine – to

research the best methods of providing care, drawing upon data from

Medicare, Health Care Markets and medical experts from across the

nation. It will test devices and drugs head-to-head to see which

work best and for whom. This new organization will quickly and

widely disseminate its unbiased, scientific findings to physicians

and patients.

>

> Though we have some of the best health care technology in the

world, effective new treatments can take years to be widely adopted.

For example, until recently, many patients did not receive beta

blockers after heart attacks even though they are cheap and highly

effective. Similarly, doctors sometimes prescribe name brand drugs

despite the availability of equally effective, less expensive generic

drugs. As new diagnostics, procedures and drugs are introduced, my

new objective medical research organization will help doctors make

sense of what works best. Government programs will offer incentives

for the use of evidence-based care and treatments.

>

>

> 7. Do you think vaccines should be investigated as a possible

cause of autism?

>

> We need to step up our research efforts to find the causes of

autism, as well as better treatments. And that research must be

transparent, accountable, open to all possibilities and driven by

science.

>

>

> 8. What will you do to protect Americans, especially young

children and pregnant women, from exposure to mercury through

vaccines?

>

> I will take all necessary steps to make sure that vaccines are as

safe as possible. We must discontinue the use of potentially

dangerous additives, including mercury, in vaccines.

>

>

> 9. What will you do to provide for the lifetime care that 250,000

to 500,000 current children with autism will need in the future?

>

> Government education services for people with disabilities end at

age 21, even though the need does not, especially for many of those

with autism. Thus, families are left to care for their adult children

with disabilities largely on their own. I will work to develop

ongoing adult education and vocational and recreational programs for

those with autism. My plans for reforming the U.S. Department of

Housing and Urban Development and strengthening federal housing

policy will expand the supply of affordable supportive housing for

people with disabilities, including adults living with autism.

>

>

> 10. Would you support a large-scale federal study of the

differences in health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated

groups?

>

> As president, I will direct my Secretary of Health and Human

Services and my Directors of the Centers for Disease Control and

National Institutes of Health to follow where science takes us and to

determine which studies to undertake based on scientific evidence.

>

>

> 11. Would you support a federal right for families and

individuals to choose for themselves which vaccines they will use?

>

> I support efforts to ensure the safety of America's vaccines and

to educate families and health care providers about vaccine options.

>

>

> 12. Are you satisfied that the federal vaccine approval process

is free of conflicts of interests, transparent and rigorous?

>

> Drug companies responsible for testing drugs prior to FDA

approval have an inherent conflict of interest between their desire

to profit from new treatments and the public's interest in ensuring

safety and efficacy. I will move toward requiring fully independent

testing of drugs, including the testing of drugs compared to existing

alternatives. Information about comparative effectiveness would be

required to be made available to the FDA and to the public.

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ---------------------------------

> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with

Search.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"toward fully funding..." Is this a yes or a no?> > 1. Will you fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? ...I support a steady path toward fully funding the federal share of special education costs and will enforce the right to receive a free and appropriate education in schools that are fully accessible ... I have repeatedly voted to fully fund special education and to make the funding mandatory, and I oppose efforts to roll back key provisions of IDEA. Gee, he's been a Senator for how long, and he doesn't know any ballpark or if he would request an amount? > 3. How much funding will you request to study potential environmental triggers of autism?> > As president, I will issue an all-hands-on deck research challenge and dedicate the needed resources to unravel autism's mysteries and follow wherever the science takes us. Is this a yes or a no to the epidemic question? Sounds to me like he doesn't know.> 4. Do you believe there is an autism epidemic in the United States?> > Autism and autism spectrum disorders affect an astonishing one in 150 children. More children than ever before – a 700 percent increase over the last decade – are being classified as having an autism spectrum disorder. I believe that we must learn more about why the number of children diagnosed with autism and autism spectrum disorders has been growing.He still didn't say what he would do, just what is wrong, he's speaking in regards to many state laws, how will he do what he says he will require, is he going to fully federalize health insurance law? > 5. What will you do to stop health insurers from discriminating against people with autism and their families?> I will require insurers to keep plans open to everyone and charge fair premiums, regardless of preexisting conditions, medical history, and other characteristics. No longer will insurance companies be able to game the system to cover only healthy people. Several states – including New Jersey, New York, and Washington – have led the way on similar community rating and guaranteed issue reforms. In addition, new national standards will ensure that all health insurance policies offer preventive and chronic care with minimal cost-sharing.Okay, he's flat out lying here in regards to what health insurance does/doesn't do. It's the physician who chooses whether or not to prescribe drugs, such as beta blockers. If a patient did not receive a prescription for such a drug, that's a physician-patient issue. I have many problems with health insurance, but them to covering "cheap" drugs isn't one of them. This sounds like total hype to me. His "new diagnostics" of testing which drug is most effective is part of the problem. If drug A works on 80% of the population and I happen to be a 20%, I still need drug B or C. What he is describing is exactly how it is now, but that still has nothing to do with promising new treatments and behavioral therapy being covered. > 6. What will you do to assure that health insurers pay for promising new treatments and behavioral therapy?> > Our health care system is predominantly fee-for-service: providers are paid for each treatment, regardless of its necessity or quality. For example, a hospital that makes a medical error is often paid for the error and then paid again to fix it. Our system should pay for results, rewarding better, more efficient care. > > As part of my proposal to transform our health care system and guarantee quality, affordable health care for every American, Medicare, my new Health Care Markets and other government programs will lead the way by paying higher rates to plans and providers that provide the very best care and penalizing plans that fail to meet critical, quantifiable goals.> > Only a small fraction — likely less than 0.1 percent — of each health care dollar is currently devoted to systematic research and assessment of the comparative effectiveness of various diagnostic and therapeutic options. I will establish a non-profit or public organization – possibly within the Institutes of Medicine – to research the best methods of providing care, drawing upon data from Medicare, Health Care Markets and medical experts from across the nation. It will test devices and drugs head-to-head to see which work best and for whom. This new organization will quickly and widely disseminate its unbiased, scientific findings to physicians and patients.> > Though we have some of the best health care technology in the world, effective new treatments can take years to be widely adopted. For example, until recently, many patients did not receive beta blockers after heart attacks even though they are cheap and highly effective. Similarly, doctors sometimes prescribe name brand drugs despite the availability of equally effective, less expensive generic drugs. As new diagnostics, procedures and drugs are introduced, my new objective medical research organization will help doctors make sense of what works best. Government programs will offer incentives for the use of evidence-based care and treatments.In other words, "no." > 7. Do you think vaccines should be investigated as a possible cause of autism?> > We need to step up our research efforts to find the causes of autism, as well as better treatments. And that research must be transparent, accountable, open to all possibilities and driven by science. > In other words, "nothing." > 8. What will you do to protect Americans, especially young children and pregnant women, from exposure to mercury through vaccines?> > I will take all necessary steps to make sure that vaccines are as safe as possible. We must discontinue the use of potentially dangerous additives, including mercury, in vaccines.> Okay, this sounds like a little bit of a good answer.> 9. What will you do to provide for the lifetime care that 250,000 to 500,000 current children with autism will need in the future?> > Government education services for people with disabilities end at age 21, even though the need does not, especially for many of those with autism. Thus, families are left to care for their adult children with disabilities largely on their own. I will work to develop ongoing adult education and vocational and recreational programs for those with autism. My plans for reforming the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and strengthening federal housing policy will expand the supply of affordable supportive housing for people with disabilities, including adults living with autism. > >Code word "I'll use 'science' for the ongoing CDC studies regurgitating the same flawed study to recreate other flawed figures to reassure the public to keep getting their kids shots and call it science." > 10. Would you support a large-scale federal study of the differences in health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups?> > As president, I will direct my Secretary of Health and Human Services and my Directors of the Centers for Disease Control and National Institutes of Health to follow where science takes us and to determine which studies to undertake based on scientific evidence.>In other words, "Hell no, I ain't about to do anything except keep pushing the same old crap about how the risks of not immunizing are far greater than the risks of chicken pox." > > 11. Would you support a federal right for families and individuals to choose for themselves which vaccines they will use?> > I support efforts to ensure the safety of America's vaccines and to educate families and health care providers about vaccine options.> This "move toward" stuff never sounds promising. > 12. Are you satisfied that the federal vaccine approval process is free of conflicts of interests, transparent and rigorous?> > Drug companies responsible for testing drugs prior to FDA approval have an inherent conflict of interest between their desire to profit from new treatments and the public's interest in ensuring safety and efficacy. I will move toward requiring fully independent testing of drugs, including the testing of drugs compared to existing alternatives. Information about comparative effectiveness would be required to be made available to the FDA and to the public.>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hard to be excited about any of them, frankly, but I can't

assume by these round-about answers what a politician would or would

not do once in office. If any front runner came out too blatantly for

dismantling and reassembling the present vaccine manufacturing game,

very realistic photos of them having sex with an orangutang and three

elves would turn up within a short time. If they were lucky. is

not considered a front runner. When he is, watch for the monkey pix.

There's the famous talk between Kerry and Bill Clinton before

the last presidential vote. The last undecided state (remind me of

which one) placed the gay marriage issue on the ballot to plant a

polarizing factor between Bush and Kerry. Bill Clinton told Kerry to

give a speech in that state (damn, I'm drawing a blank) saying he--

Kerry-- opposed gay marriage, though he-- Kerry-- did not. Kerry said

thanks but no thanks, that he would speak his mind on it or whatever,

that he supported gay marriage. And Bush got in a second time on the

other guy's principles.

The political game is rigged and filthy right now. is blacked

out in the news for the most part because of his frankness. We're

left to guess what anyone really means, save for when their voting

history, ideology and affilitions are very blatant.

By the by, the FDA does not require that drug A act any differently

on the body than the already-on-the-market-and-already-killing-

grandma drug B in order to approve it, merely that it looks better

than placebo in rigged drug trials. That's what is talking

about.

>

> " toward fully funding... " Is this a yes or a no?

> >

> > 1. Will you fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities

Education

> Act?

> ...I support a steady path toward fully funding the federal

share of

> special education costs and will enforce the right to receive a

free and

> appropriate education in schools that are fully accessible ... I

have

> repeatedly voted to fully fund special education and to make the

funding

> mandatory, and I oppose efforts to roll back key provisions of IDEA.

>

>

> Gee, he's been a Senator for how long, and he doesn't know any

ballpark

> or if he would request an amount?

>

> > 3. How much funding will you request to study potential

> environmental triggers of autism?

> >

> > As president, I will issue an all-hands-on deck research

challenge

> and dedicate the needed resources to unravel autism's mysteries and

> follow wherever the science takes us.

>

>

> Is this a yes or a no to the epidemic question? Sounds to me like

he

> doesn't know.

>

> > 4. Do you believe there is an autism epidemic in the United

States?

> >

> > Autism and autism spectrum disorders affect an astonishing one

in

> 150 children. More children than ever before – a 700 percent

> increase over the last decade – are being classified as having an

> autism spectrum disorder. I believe that we must learn more about

why

> the number of children diagnosed with autism and autism spectrum

> disorders has been growing.

>

> He still didn't say what he would do, just what is wrong, he's

speaking

> in regards to many state laws, how will he do what he says he will

> require, is he going to fully federalize health insurance law?

>

> > 5. What will you do to stop health insurers from discriminating

> against people with autism and their families?

>

> > I will require insurers to keep plans open to everyone and

charge

> fair premiums, regardless of preexisting conditions, medical

history,

> and other characteristics. No longer will insurance companies be

able to

> game the system to cover only healthy people. Several states –

> including New Jersey, New York, and Washington – have led the way on

> similar community rating and guaranteed issue reforms. In addition,

new

> national standards will ensure that all health insurance policies

offer

> preventive and chronic care with minimal cost-sharing.

>

>

> Okay, he's flat out lying here in regards to what health insurance

> does/doesn't do. It's the physician who chooses whether or not to

> prescribe drugs, such as beta blockers. If a patient did not

receive a

> prescription for such a drug, that's a physician-patient issue. I

have

> many problems with health insurance, but them to covering " cheap "

drugs

> isn't one of them. This sounds like total hype to me. His " new

> diagnostics " of testing which drug is most effective is part of the

> problem. If drug A works on 80% of the population and I happen to

be a

> 20%, I still need drug B or C. What he is describing is exactly how

it

> is now, but that still has nothing to do with promising new

treatments

> and behavioral therapy being covered.

>

> > 6. What will you do to assure that health insurers pay for

promising

> new treatments and behavioral therapy?

> >

> > Our health care system is predominantly fee-for-service:

providers

> are paid for each treatment, regardless of its necessity or

quality.

> For example, a hospital that makes a medical error is often paid

for the

> error and then paid again to fix it. Our system should pay for

results,

> rewarding better, more efficient care.

> >

> > As part of my proposal to transform our health care system and

> guarantee quality, affordable health care for every American,

Medicare,

> my new Health Care Markets and other government programs will lead

the

> way by paying higher rates to plans and providers that provide the

very

> best care and penalizing plans that fail to meet critical,

quantifiable

> goals.

> >

> > Only a small fraction — likely less than 0.1 percent — of

> each health care dollar is currently devoted to systematic research

and

> assessment of the comparative effectiveness of various diagnostic

and

> therapeutic options. I will establish a non-profit or public

> organization – possibly within the Institutes of Medicine – to

> research the best methods of providing care, drawing upon data from

> Medicare, Health Care Markets and medical experts from across the

> nation. It will test devices and drugs head-to-head to see which

work

> best and for whom. This new organization will quickly and widely

> disseminate its unbiased, scientific findings to physicians and

> patients.

> >

> > Though we have some of the best health care technology in the

world,

> effective new treatments can take years to be widely adopted. For

> example, until recently, many patients did not receive beta blockers

> after heart attacks even though they are cheap and highly

effective.

> Similarly, doctors sometimes prescribe name brand drugs despite the

> availability of equally effective, less expensive generic drugs.

As new

> diagnostics, procedures and drugs are introduced, my new objective

> medical research organization will help doctors make sense of what

works

> best. Government programs will offer incentives for the use of

> evidence-based care and treatments.

>

>

>

> In other words, " no. "

>

> > 7. Do you think vaccines should be investigated as a possible

cause

> of autism?

> >

> > We need to step up our research efforts to find the causes of

> autism, as well as better treatments. And that research must be

> transparent, accountable, open to all possibilities and driven by

> science.

> >

>

>

> In other words, " nothing. "

>

> > 8. What will you do to protect Americans, especially young

children

> and pregnant women, from exposure to mercury through vaccines?

> >

> > I will take all necessary steps to make sure that vaccines are

as

> safe as possible. We must discontinue the use of potentially

dangerous

> additives, including mercury, in vaccines.

> >

>

> Okay, this sounds like a little bit of a good answer.

>

> > 9. What will you do to provide for the lifetime care that

250,000 to

> 500,000 current children with autism will need in the future?

> >

> > Government education services for people with disabilities end

at

> age 21, even though the need does not, especially for many of those

with

> autism. Thus, families are left to care for their adult children

with

> disabilities largely on their own. I will work to develop ongoing

adult

> education and vocational and recreational programs for those with

> autism. My plans for reforming the U.S. Department of Housing and

Urban

> Development and strengthening federal housing policy will expand the

> supply of affordable supportive housing for people with

disabilities,

> including adults living with autism.

> >

> >

>

> Code word " I'll use 'science' for the ongoing CDC studies

regurgitating

> the same flawed study to recreate other flawed figures to reassure

the

> public to keep getting their kids shots and call it science. "

>

> > 10. Would you support a large-scale federal study of the

differences

> in health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups?

> >

> > As president, I will direct my Secretary of Health and Human

> Services and my Directors of the Centers for Disease Control and

> National Institutes of Health to follow where science takes us and

to

> determine which studies to undertake based on scientific evidence.

> >

>

> In other words, " Hell no, I ain't about to do anything except keep

> pushing the same old crap about how the risks of not immunizing

are far

> greater than the risks of chicken pox. "

> >

> > 11. Would you support a federal right for families and

individuals

> to choose for themselves which vaccines they will use?

> >

> > I support efforts to ensure the safety of America's vaccines and

> to educate families and health care providers about vaccine options.

> >

>

> This " move toward " stuff never sounds promising.

>

> > 12. Are you satisfied that the federal vaccine approval process

is

> free of conflicts of interests, transparent and rigorous?

> >

> > Drug companies responsible for testing drugs prior to FDA

approval

> have an inherent conflict of interest between their desire to profit

> from new treatments and the public's interest in ensuring safety and

> efficacy. I will move toward requiring fully independent testing of

> drugs, including the testing of drugs compared to existing

alternatives.

> Information about comparative effectiveness would be required to be

made

> available to the FDA and to the public.

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand this thing about pre-existing conditions for

autism (see # 5). The candidates don't seem to know that autism is

not funded because it is historically not considered a medical

condition which is why we have to hide behind other diagnoses for

medical treatments. Also the behavioral treatments are hidden under

neuro-developmental delay which is why they stop paying after age 7

because by then you are supposed to catch up and not need any

services.

I don't think these candidates even know what the issues are (or the

people who are writing these answers for them).

How are you supposed to help fight this thing if you don't even know

what it is and what problems we are facing? Have they ever sat down

and even spoken with an ASD family? Its like Mitt Romney telling that

guy in the wheelchair that he does not support the medical use of

marijuana. Does he even know the kind of debilitating pain one can

suffer from an illness like that? Do any of them know that kids with

ASD headbang because there is intense nerve pain and its tied to

abdominal gut pain and they cannot tell anyone because they are non-

verbal?

You don't need to go anywhere, this isn't Startrek where the answers

are in another galaxy. Its right here in front of your nose, you just

have to look and ask the people who experience this on a daily basis.

Whether you want to, or whether you just want to hide, is another

matter.

Gayatri

>

> " toward fully funding... " Is this a yes or a no?

> >

> > 1. Will you fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities

Education

> Act?

> ...I support a steady path toward fully funding the federal

share of

> special education costs and will enforce the right to receive a

free and

> appropriate education in schools that are fully accessible ... I

have

> repeatedly voted to fully fund special education and to make the

funding

> mandatory, and I oppose efforts to roll back key provisions of IDEA.

>

>

> Gee, he's been a Senator for how long, and he doesn't know any

ballpark

> or if he would request an amount?

>

> > 3. How much funding will you request to study potential

> environmental triggers of autism?

> >

> > As president, I will issue an all-hands-on deck research

challenge

> and dedicate the needed resources to unravel autism's mysteries and

> follow wherever the science takes us.

>

>

> Is this a yes or a no to the epidemic question? Sounds to me like

he

> doesn't know.

>

> > 4. Do you believe there is an autism epidemic in the United

States?

> >

> > Autism and autism spectrum disorders affect an astonishing one

in

> 150 children. More children than ever before – a 700 percent

> increase over the last decade – are being classified as having an

> autism spectrum disorder. I believe that we must learn more about

why

> the number of children diagnosed with autism and autism spectrum

> disorders has been growing.

>

> He still didn't say what he would do, just what is wrong, he's

speaking

> in regards to many state laws, how will he do what he says he will

> require, is he going to fully federalize health insurance law?

>

> > 5. What will you do to stop health insurers from discriminating

> against people with autism and their families?

>

> > I will require insurers to keep plans open to everyone and

charge

> fair premiums, regardless of preexisting conditions, medical

history,

> and other characteristics. No longer will insurance companies be

able to

> game the system to cover only healthy people. Several states –

> including New Jersey, New York, and Washington – have led the way on

> similar community rating and guaranteed issue reforms. In addition,

new

> national standards will ensure that all health insurance policies

offer

> preventive and chronic care with minimal cost-sharing.

>

>

> Okay, he's flat out lying here in regards to what health insurance

> does/doesn't do. It's the physician who chooses whether or not to

> prescribe drugs, such as beta blockers. If a patient did not

receive a

> prescription for such a drug, that's a physician-patient issue. I

have

> many problems with health insurance, but them to covering " cheap "

drugs

> isn't one of them. This sounds like total hype to me. His " new

> diagnostics " of testing which drug is most effective is part of the

> problem. If drug A works on 80% of the population and I happen to

be a

> 20%, I still need drug B or C. What he is describing is exactly how

it

> is now, but that still has nothing to do with promising new

treatments

> and behavioral therapy being covered.

>

> > 6. What will you do to assure that health insurers pay for

promising

> new treatments and behavioral therapy?

> >

> > Our health care system is predominantly fee-for-service:

providers

> are paid for each treatment, regardless of its necessity or

quality.

> For example, a hospital that makes a medical error is often paid

for the

> error and then paid again to fix it. Our system should pay for

results,

> rewarding better, more efficient care.

> >

> > As part of my proposal to transform our health care system and

> guarantee quality, affordable health care for every American,

Medicare,

> my new Health Care Markets and other government programs will lead

the

> way by paying higher rates to plans and providers that provide the

very

> best care and penalizing plans that fail to meet critical,

quantifiable

> goals.

> >

> > Only a small fraction — likely less than 0.1 percent — of

> each health care dollar is currently devoted to systematic research

and

> assessment of the comparative effectiveness of various diagnostic

and

> therapeutic options. I will establish a non-profit or public

> organization – possibly within the Institutes of Medicine – to

> research the best methods of providing care, drawing upon data from

> Medicare, Health Care Markets and medical experts from across the

> nation. It will test devices and drugs head-to-head to see which

work

> best and for whom. This new organization will quickly and widely

> disseminate its unbiased, scientific findings to physicians and

> patients.

> >

> > Though we have some of the best health care technology in the

world,

> effective new treatments can take years to be widely adopted. For

> example, until recently, many patients did not receive beta blockers

> after heart attacks even though they are cheap and highly

effective.

> Similarly, doctors sometimes prescribe name brand drugs despite the

> availability of equally effective, less expensive generic drugs.

As new

> diagnostics, procedures and drugs are introduced, my new objective

> medical research organization will help doctors make sense of what

works

> best. Government programs will offer incentives for the use of

> evidence-based care and treatments.

>

>

>

> In other words, " no. "

>

> > 7. Do you think vaccines should be investigated as a possible

cause

> of autism?

> >

> > We need to step up our research efforts to find the causes of

> autism, as well as better treatments. And that research must be

> transparent, accountable, open to all possibilities and driven by

> science.

> >

>

>

> In other words, " nothing. "

>

> > 8. What will you do to protect Americans, especially young

children

> and pregnant women, from exposure to mercury through vaccines?

> >

> > I will take all necessary steps to make sure that vaccines are

as

> safe as possible. We must discontinue the use of potentially

dangerous

> additives, including mercury, in vaccines.

> >

>

> Okay, this sounds like a little bit of a good answer.

>

> > 9. What will you do to provide for the lifetime care that

250,000 to

> 500,000 current children with autism will need in the future?

> >

> > Government education services for people with disabilities end

at

> age 21, even though the need does not, especially for many of those

with

> autism. Thus, families are left to care for their adult children

with

> disabilities largely on their own. I will work to develop ongoing

adult

> education and vocational and recreational programs for those with

> autism. My plans for reforming the U.S. Department of Housing and

Urban

> Development and strengthening federal housing policy will expand the

> supply of affordable supportive housing for people with

disabilities,

> including adults living with autism.

> >

> >

>

> Code word " I'll use 'science' for the ongoing CDC studies

regurgitating

> the same flawed study to recreate other flawed figures to reassure

the

> public to keep getting their kids shots and call it science. "

>

> > 10. Would you support a large-scale federal study of the

differences

> in health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups?

> >

> > As president, I will direct my Secretary of Health and Human

> Services and my Directors of the Centers for Disease Control and

> National Institutes of Health to follow where science takes us and

to

> determine which studies to undertake based on scientific evidence.

> >

>

> In other words, " Hell no, I ain't about to do anything except keep

> pushing the same old crap about how the risks of not immunizing

are far

> greater than the risks of chicken pox. "

> >

> > 11. Would you support a federal right for families and

individuals

> to choose for themselves which vaccines they will use?

> >

> > I support efforts to ensure the safety of America's vaccines and

> to educate families and health care providers about vaccine options.

> >

>

> This " move toward " stuff never sounds promising.

>

> > 12. Are you satisfied that the federal vaccine approval process

is

> free of conflicts of interests, transparent and rigorous?

> >

> > Drug companies responsible for testing drugs prior to FDA

approval

> have an inherent conflict of interest between their desire to profit

> from new treatments and the public's interest in ensuring safety and

> efficacy. I will move toward requiring fully independent testing of

> drugs, including the testing of drugs compared to existing

alternatives.

> Information about comparative effectiveness would be required to be

made

> available to the FDA and to the public.

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are absolutely correct. I think what it means is that we have a

lot of work to do because if we don't do it no one else will.

> >

> > " toward fully funding... " Is this a yes or a no?

> > >

> > > 1. Will you fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities

> Education

> > Act?

> > ...I support a steady path toward fully funding the federal

> share of

> > special education costs and will enforce the right to receive a

> free and

> > appropriate education in schools that are fully accessible ...

I

> have

> > repeatedly voted to fully fund special education and to make the

> funding

> > mandatory, and I oppose efforts to roll back key provisions of

IDEA.

> >

> >

> > Gee, he's been a Senator for how long, and he doesn't know any

> ballpark

> > or if he would request an amount?

> >

> > > 3. How much funding will you request to study potential

> > environmental triggers of autism?

> > >

> > > As president, I will issue an all-hands-on deck research

> challenge

> > and dedicate the needed resources to unravel autism's mysteries

and

> > follow wherever the science takes us.

> >

> >

> > Is this a yes or a no to the epidemic question? Sounds to me

like

> he

> > doesn't know.

> >

> > > 4. Do you believe there is an autism epidemic in the United

> States?

> > >

> > > Autism and autism spectrum disorders affect an astonishing

one

> in

> > 150 children. More children than ever before – a 700 percent

> > increase over the last decade – are being classified as having an

> > autism spectrum disorder. I believe that we must learn more

about

> why

> > the number of children diagnosed with autism and autism spectrum

> > disorders has been growing.

> >

> > He still didn't say what he would do, just what is wrong, he's

> speaking

> > in regards to many state laws, how will he do what he says he

will

> > require, is he going to fully federalize health insurance law?

> >

> > > 5. What will you do to stop health insurers from

discriminating

> > against people with autism and their families?

> >

> > > I will require insurers to keep plans open to everyone and

> charge

> > fair premiums, regardless of preexisting conditions, medical

> history,

> > and other characteristics. No longer will insurance companies be

> able to

> > game the system to cover only healthy people. Several states –

> > including New Jersey, New York, and Washington – have led the

way on

> > similar community rating and guaranteed issue reforms. In

addition,

> new

> > national standards will ensure that all health insurance

policies

> offer

> > preventive and chronic care with minimal cost-sharing.

> >

> >

> > Okay, he's flat out lying here in regards to what health

insurance

> > does/doesn't do. It's the physician who chooses whether or not to

> > prescribe drugs, such as beta blockers. If a patient did not

> receive a

> > prescription for such a drug, that's a physician-patient issue.

I

> have

> > many problems with health insurance, but them to

covering " cheap "

> drugs

> > isn't one of them. This sounds like total hype to me. His " new

> > diagnostics " of testing which drug is most effective is part of

the

> > problem. If drug A works on 80% of the population and I happen

to

> be a

> > 20%, I still need drug B or C. What he is describing is exactly

how

> it

> > is now, but that still has nothing to do with promising new

> treatments

> > and behavioral therapy being covered.

> >

> > > 6. What will you do to assure that health insurers pay for

> promising

> > new treatments and behavioral therapy?

> > >

> > > Our health care system is predominantly fee-for-service:

> providers

> > are paid for each treatment, regardless of its necessity or

> quality.

> > For example, a hospital that makes a medical error is often paid

> for the

> > error and then paid again to fix it. Our system should pay for

> results,

> > rewarding better, more efficient care.

> > >

> > > As part of my proposal to transform our health care system

and

> > guarantee quality, affordable health care for every American,

> Medicare,

> > my new Health Care Markets and other government programs will

lead

> the

> > way by paying higher rates to plans and providers that provide

the

> very

> > best care and penalizing plans that fail to meet critical,

> quantifiable

> > goals.

> > >

> > > Only a small fraction — likely less than 0.1 percent — of

> > each health care dollar is currently devoted to systematic

research

> and

> > assessment of the comparative effectiveness of various

diagnostic

> and

> > therapeutic options. I will establish a non-profit or public

> > organization – possibly within the Institutes of Medicine – to

> > research the best methods of providing care, drawing upon data

from

> > Medicare, Health Care Markets and medical experts from across the

> > nation. It will test devices and drugs head-to-head to see

which

> work

> > best and for whom. This new organization will quickly and widely

> > disseminate its unbiased, scientific findings to physicians and

> > patients.

> > >

> > > Though we have some of the best health care technology in

the

> world,

> > effective new treatments can take years to be widely adopted. For

> > example, until recently, many patients did not receive beta

blockers

> > after heart attacks even though they are cheap and highly

> effective.

> > Similarly, doctors sometimes prescribe name brand drugs despite

the

> > availability of equally effective, less expensive generic

drugs.

> As new

> > diagnostics, procedures and drugs are introduced, my new

objective

> > medical research organization will help doctors make sense of

what

> works

> > best. Government programs will offer incentives for the use of

> > evidence-based care and treatments.

> >

> >

> >

> > In other words, " no. "

> >

> > > 7. Do you think vaccines should be investigated as a

possible

> cause

> > of autism?

> > >

> > > We need to step up our research efforts to find the causes of

> > autism, as well as better treatments. And that research must be

> > transparent, accountable, open to all possibilities and driven by

> > science.

> > >

> >

> >

> > In other words, " nothing. "

> >

> > > 8. What will you do to protect Americans, especially young

> children

> > and pregnant women, from exposure to mercury through vaccines?

> > >

> > > I will take all necessary steps to make sure that vaccines

are

> as

> > safe as possible. We must discontinue the use of potentially

> dangerous

> > additives, including mercury, in vaccines.

> > >

> >

> > Okay, this sounds like a little bit of a good answer.

> >

> > > 9. What will you do to provide for the lifetime care that

> 250,000 to

> > 500,000 current children with autism will need in the future?

> > >

> > > Government education services for people with disabilities

end

> at

> > age 21, even though the need does not, especially for many of

those

> with

> > autism. Thus, families are left to care for their adult children

> with

> > disabilities largely on their own. I will work to develop

ongoing

> adult

> > education and vocational and recreational programs for those with

> > autism. My plans for reforming the U.S. Department of Housing

and

> Urban

> > Development and strengthening federal housing policy will expand

the

> > supply of affordable supportive housing for people with

> disabilities,

> > including adults living with autism.

> > >

> > >

> >

> > Code word " I'll use 'science' for the ongoing CDC studies

> regurgitating

> > the same flawed study to recreate other flawed figures to

reassure

> the

> > public to keep getting their kids shots and call it science. "

> >

> > > 10. Would you support a large-scale federal study of the

> differences

> > in health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups?

> > >

> > > As president, I will direct my Secretary of Health and Human

> > Services and my Directors of the Centers for Disease Control and

> > National Institutes of Health to follow where science takes us

and

> to

> > determine which studies to undertake based on scientific

evidence.

> > >

> >

> > In other words, " Hell no, I ain't about to do anything except

keep

> > pushing the same old crap about how the risks of not immunizing

> are far

> > greater than the risks of chicken pox. "

> > >

> > > 11. Would you support a federal right for families and

> individuals

> > to choose for themselves which vaccines they will use?

> > >

> > > I support efforts to ensure the safety of America's vaccines

and

> > to educate families and health care providers about vaccine

options.

> > >

> >

> > This " move toward " stuff never sounds promising.

> >

> > > 12. Are you satisfied that the federal vaccine approval

process

> is

> > free of conflicts of interests, transparent and rigorous?

> > >

> > > Drug companies responsible for testing drugs prior to FDA

> approval

> > have an inherent conflict of interest between their desire to

profit

> > from new treatments and the public's interest in ensuring safety

and

> > efficacy. I will move toward requiring fully independent

testing of

> > drugs, including the testing of drugs compared to existing

> alternatives.

> > Information about comparative effectiveness would be required to

be

> made

> > available to the FDA and to the public.

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check out Ron .

Pamela

" Courage is doing what you're afraid to do. There can be no courage unless

you're scared. "

Eddie Rickenbacker, top US fighter ace, WWI

_____

From: [mailto: ]

On Behalf Of Zurama

Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 8:52 PM

Subject: [ ] Re: Response to A-CHAMP Questionnaire

So who is the best candidate for our kids? They seem to all tells us

what we want to hear. The answers are genetic and very diplomatic, but

who do we trust?

Zurama

>

> A-CHAMP just received responses to our candidates questionnaire from

which are posted below. We have also received responses

from Senator Biden and Senator Obama which you can read at the A-CHAMP

website, www.a-champ.org. Please feel free to distribute to anyone,

anywhere, anyhow.

>

> 1. Will you fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education

Act?

>

> Education is America's sturdiest ladder of opportunity, but for

many of the more than 5 million school-age children with disabilities,

that ladder is missing several rungs. With IDEA, Congress made a

commitment to America's children. Having a disability should not

stand in the way of a child receiving a quality education in the least

restrictive setting. But the federal government has not lived up to

its responsibilities, funding less than half its share.

>

> I support a steady path toward fully funding the federal share of

special education costs and will enforce the right to receive a free

and appropriate education in schools that are fully accessible –

starting with quality early childhood education that is inclusive of

all children, regardless of disability or their learning style, and

continuing with individualized education programs when requested and

classroom materials and technology that are accessible to all

students. Additionally, child care providers need training to help

them recognize when additional services might be needed and where

those community resources are.

>

> I have repeatedly voted to fully fund special education and to

make the funding mandatory, and I oppose efforts to roll back key

provisions of IDEA. It is time that children with disabilities

receive the quality education they deserve.

>

>

> 2. Do you believe that the Combating Autism Act provides enough

money to find the cause, or causes, of autism and effective treatments?

>

> While Congress took an important step last year by dedicating more

than $900 million to address autism over the next five years, more can

and must be done. Resources for research should be a central part of

future autism initiatives.

>

>

> 3. How much funding will you request to study potential

environmental triggers of autism?

>

> As president, I will issue an all-hands-on deck research challenge

and dedicate the needed resources to unravel autism's mysteries and

follow wherever the science takes us.

>

>

> 4. Do you believe there is an autism epidemic in the United States?

>

> Autism and autism spectrum disorders affect an astonishing one in

150 children. More children than ever before – a 700 percent increase

over the last decade – are being classified as having an autism

spectrum disorder. I believe that we must learn more about why the

number of children diagnosed with autism and autism spectrum disorders

has been growing.

>

>

> 5. What will you do to stop health insurers from discriminating

against people with autism and their families?

>

> I will require insurers to keep plans open to everyone and charge

fair premiums, regardless of preexisting conditions, medical history,

and other characteristics. No longer will insurance companies be able

to game the system to cover only healthy people. Several states –

including New Jersey, New York, and Washington – have led the way on

similar community rating and guaranteed issue reforms. In addition,

new national standards will ensure that all health insurance policies

offer preventive and chronic care with minimal cost-sharing.

>

>

> 6. What will you do to assure that health insurers pay for

promising new treatments and behavioral therapy?

>

> Our health care system is predominantly fee-for-service: providers

are paid for each treatment, regardless of its necessity or quality.

For example, a hospital that makes a medical error is often paid for

the error and then paid again to fix it. Our system should pay for

results, rewarding better, more efficient care.

>

> As part of my proposal to transform our health care system and

guarantee quality, affordable health care for every American,

Medicare, my new Health Care Markets and other government programs

will lead the way by paying higher rates to plans and providers that

provide the very best care and penalizing plans that fail to meet

critical, quantifiable goals.

>

> Only a small fraction — likely less than 0.1 percent — of each

health care dollar is currently devoted to systematic research and

assessment of the comparative effectiveness of various diagnostic and

therapeutic options. I will establish a non-profit or public

organization – possibly within the Institutes of Medicine – to

research the best methods of providing care, drawing upon data from

Medicare, Health Care Markets and medical experts from across the

nation. It will test devices and drugs head-to-head to see which work

best and for whom. This new organization will quickly and widely

disseminate its unbiased, scientific findings to physicians and patients.

>

> Though we have some of the best health care technology in the

world, effective new treatments can take years to be widely adopted.

For example, until recently, many patients did not receive beta

blockers after heart attacks even though they are cheap and highly

effective. Similarly, doctors sometimes prescribe name brand drugs

despite the availability of equally effective, less expensive generic

drugs. As new diagnostics, procedures and drugs are introduced, my

new objective medical research organization will help doctors make

sense of what works best. Government programs will offer incentives

for the use of evidence-based care and treatments.

>

>

> 7. Do you think vaccines should be investigated as a possible

cause of autism?

>

> We need to step up our research efforts to find the causes of

autism, as well as better treatments. And that research must be

transparent, accountable, open to all possibilities and driven by

science.

>

>

> 8. What will you do to protect Americans, especially young

children and pregnant women, from exposure to mercury through vaccines?

>

> I will take all necessary steps to make sure that vaccines are as

safe as possible. We must discontinue the use of potentially

dangerous additives, including mercury, in vaccines.

>

>

> 9. What will you do to provide for the lifetime care that 250,000

to 500,000 current children with autism will need in the future?

>

> Government education services for people with disabilities end at

age 21, even though the need does not, especially for many of those

with autism. Thus, families are left to care for their adult children

with disabilities largely on their own. I will work to develop

ongoing adult education and vocational and recreational programs for

those with autism. My plans for reforming the U.S. Department of

Housing and Urban Development and strengthening federal housing policy

will expand the supply of affordable supportive housing for people

with disabilities, including adults living with autism.

>

>

> 10. Would you support a large-scale federal study of the

differences in health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups?

>

> As president, I will direct my Secretary of Health and Human

Services and my Directors of the Centers for Disease Control and

National Institutes of Health to follow where science takes us and to

determine which studies to undertake based on scientific evidence.

>

>

> 11. Would you support a federal right for families and individuals

to choose for themselves which vaccines they will use?

>

> I support efforts to ensure the safety of America's vaccines and

to educate families and health care providers about vaccine options.

>

>

> 12. Are you satisfied that the federal vaccine approval process is

free of conflicts of interests, transparent and rigorous?

>

> Drug companies responsible for testing drugs prior to FDA approval

have an inherent conflict of interest between their desire to profit

from new treatments and the public's interest in ensuring safety and

efficacy. I will move toward requiring fully independent testing of

drugs, including the testing of drugs compared to existing

alternatives. Information about comparative effectiveness would be

required to be made available to the FDA and to the public.

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

> I will take all necessary steps to make sure that vaccines are as safe as

possible. We must

discontinue the use of potentially dangerous additives, including mercury, in

vaccines.

At least says that. My take is that he hasn't been clued in about

autism/mercury yet,

but that of all the candidates he is the one who really understands the damage

corporation

have wreaked on the country.

It's not government power alone that made this mess, it's govt. power joined to

corporate

power that did it. was a great plaintiff's lawyer, and that's just what

we need.

Nell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so on the one hand edwards knows that mercury in vaccinations is dangerous

and on the other you are saying that he hasn't been clued in on the

autism-hg connection yet? that doesn't make sense to me, especially given

the nature of the questions from a-champ.

yes, corporations have wreaked damage, but as you accurately said, gov't is

the enabler. it's really very simple: without the strong arm of the state no

corporation in the world can force you to vaccinate (or do anything else for

that matter). and without special treatment from the gov't (protected

markets, guaranteed markets, legislative riders, etc.) you would be able to

recoup damages for your losses when a company you choose to deal with is

negligent.

i'll be casting my vote for ron paul, who has stated on the record his

opposition to compulsory vaccination (

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/health-freedom/). he's also said that

kids are receiving too many vaccinations. he also truly understands

property rights (not the least of which is your right to self-ownership) as

well as how legislation and regulation often create second-order effects

(like autism).

>

> I will take all necessary steps to make sure that vaccines are as safe

as possible. We must

discontinue the use of potentially dangerous additives, including mercury,

in vaccines.

At least says that. My take is that he hasn't been clued in about

autism/mercury yet,

but that of all the candidates he is the one who really understands the

damage corporation

have wreaked on the country.

It's not government power alone that made this mess, it's govt. power joined

to corporate

power that did it. was a great plaintiff's lawyer, and that's just

what we need.

Nell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is my take on ....

My son is 11 and I think knows exactly what is going on

with autism- as we parents wait for special master Hasting to rule

whether we will be compensate through the vaccine fund or not - One of

the lawyer who is on the panel who is on our side of that consul was

traveling and supporting in the last election. I beleive big

bussiness is very afraid of Ewards. I don't think it would be wise for

any candidate to say out loud they are going to move forwards on the

Thimersol issue until electe. My 2 cents Ann

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" I don't think these candidates even know what the

issues are (or the

people who are writing these answers for them). "

That sums up the current race better than anything you

could write with twice the words.

Dan Burton said once that if autsim hasn't personally

affected your family you do not have a clue. Why

don't we try and get him to run?

________________________________________________________________________________\

____

Looking for last minute shopping deals?

Find them fast with Search.

http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but many insurance companies require you try the low cost and

move up the drug class toward the highest drug before they'll approve.

I'm all for generics and going with commonsense pricing, but at the

end of the day I think it should be left up to the doctor & client.

Personally, I think all the candidates are disappointment. I come

closest to but disagree with him on a big viewpoint, so I'm

feeling rather negative about them all.

Debi

> By the by, the FDA does not require that drug A act any differently

> on the body than the already-on-the-market-and-already-killing-

> grandma drug B in order to approve it, merely that it looks better

> than placebo in rigged drug trials. That's what is talking

> about.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am so happy came in second last night. My 2 cents Ann

>

> This is my take on ....

> My son is 11 and I think knows exactly what is going on

> with autism- as we parents wait for special master Hasting to rule

> whether we will be compensate through the vaccine fund or not - One

of

> the lawyer who is on the panel who is on our side of that consul was

> traveling and supporting in the last election. I beleive

big

> bussiness is very afraid of Ewards. I don't think it would be wise

for

> any candidate to say out loud they are going to move forwards on the

> Thimersol issue until electe. My 2 cents Ann

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> and without special treatment from the gov't (protected

> markets, guaranteed markets, legislative riders, etc.) you would be able to

> recoup damages for your losses when a company you choose to deal with is

> negligent.

But the reason corporations get special treatment from the govt. is that they

donate

money to politicians, who then owe them. The govt. doesn't pass out special

favors just for

fun.

is the only candidate who doesn't talk to lobbyists. He doesn't owe big

pharma.

>

> i'll be casting my vote for ron paul, who has stated on the record his

> opposition to compulsory vaccination

Ron wants to get rid of the FDA and other govt. regulatory agencies. While

I

completely agree that the FDA and the CDC are broken, I don't think getting rid

of any

regulation of corporations is a credible idea. You see what happens when

regulation is lax?

We get thimerosal in vaxes and lead in our toys. What do you think is going to

happen if

there is NO regulation? Think corporations will clean up out of the goodness of

their

hearts?

Nell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> This is what worries me, he is still for a national health care reform

thingy. And I think

that naturally leads to parents' losing control of the right to NOT vax.

Well, here in France where of course health care is nationalized, you can get a

homeopath

to give a vax exemption. I had no problem handing in the old and insufficient

vax records

to the village school, no one has said a peep. One mother I've spoken to told me

she told

the school her kid wasn't getting any vaxes and to bugger off. She also never

heard a peep

about it. That's been my experience in the States too.

Nationalized medicine in France simply means that the govt. pays for a basic

level of care.

You can go to whatever doctor you want, you can buy extra insurance if you want.

I haven't

been inside the system enough to say firsthand, but if you're worried about

controls made

from on high, it looks a whole lot better than HMO medicine, because treatment

decisions

are made by the doctors, not by the state.

> And I don't want the vaxes regardless of what they do to them.

Agreed.

After thinking about it, I don't think any of the candidates are going to talk

honestly about

vaccines until after the election. We're a small sliver of the electorate, and

coming out in

favor of loosening vax regulations or going after big pharma for the damage

they've

caused would be opening themselves to a tidal wave of criticism. Our votes

wouldn't be

anywhere near enough to compensate.

Nell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i am 100% completely ok with no FDA and CDC. more regulation on top of

already bad regulation is not an improvement. and really, what " broken "

government agencies have ever been " fixed " for the better?

i doubt many on this list want more gov't regulation of these biomedical

therapies we are pursuing. i know i sure don't. i am extremely thankful

that i can freely go to the DAN! doc of my choosing and buy supplements and

chelate without having to get approval by some bureaucrat (which is the

direction universal health care will take us incidentally).

and for the record, i absolutely don't think corporations will " clean up out

of the goodness of their hearts " . if there are no market distortions then

they will do it because of market pressures. that's how free markets work.

right now the CDC has essentially sanctioned thimerosal (and the FDA

grandfathered thimerosal). they also mandate a vaccination schedule. you

also cannot directly sue a vaccine manufacturer if you or your child is

adversely affected. etc. these are market distortions caused directly by

the government and not due to a lack of regulation. without them the

situation would likely have been very different.

as for lead in toys, it seems to me that companies like Mattel were pretty

responsible overall (as opposed to, say, uh Eli Lilly). while i obviously

don't know the actual numbers i'd bet dollars-to-dough nuts that there were

very few injured kids from the whole lead paint episode. note the time

duration as well. in the highly-regulated vaccine market we've had

thimerosal for 60+ years and it's still being used. see, Mattel is worried

about lawsuits and future sales so they have to clean things up if they want

to stay in business. Vaccine manufacturers don't because the government

guarantees their markets. What incentive do they have? Their product will

be purchased regardless. I believe even the money paid into VAERS isn't

paid by them but rather insurance and taxes/fees on the shots. how's that

for irony?

and that's not to say that all corporations are wonderful, lovely,

responsible, etc. but without the backing of the state i can choose which

ones to deal with. on the other hand i cannot, for the most part, choose

which laws to obey (like the government does).

i'll keep standing by Dr. .

---------------------------------------------------

Ron wants to get rid of the FDA and other govt. regulatory agencies.

While I

completely agree that the FDA and the CDC are broken, I don't think getting

rid of any

regulation of corporations is a credible idea. You see what happens when

regulation is lax?

We get thimerosal in vaxes and lead in our toys. What do you think is going

to happen if

there is NO regulation? Think corporations will clean up out of the goodness

of their

hearts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be curious to see other candidates answers to these questions

especially Ron (my favorite) who has always given very honest

answers. Since Ron is a doctor (obstectrics) I am sure he would

know a bit more on this topic. I do know that he opposes giving so

many vaccines and that they should not be mandated.

Tina

>

> A-CHAMP just received responses to our candidates questionnaire

from which are posted below. We have also received

responses from Senator Biden and Senator Obama which you can read at

the A-CHAMP website, www.a-champ.org. Please feel free to distribute

to anyone, anywhere, anyhow.

>

> 1. Will you fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities

Education Act?

>

> Education is America's sturdiest ladder of opportunity, but for

many of the more than 5 million school-age children with

disabilities, that ladder is missing several rungs. With IDEA,

Congress made a commitment to America's children. Having a

disability should not stand in the way of a child receiving a quality

education in the least restrictive setting. But the federal

government has not lived up to its responsibilities, funding less

than half its share.

>

> I support a steady path toward fully funding the federal share of

special education costs and will enforce the right to receive a free

and appropriate education in schools that are fully accessible –

starting with quality early childhood education that is inclusive of

all children, regardless of disability or their learning style, and

continuing with individualized education programs when requested and

classroom materials and technology that are accessible to all

students. Additionally, child care providers need training to help

them recognize when additional services might be needed and where

those community resources are.

>

> I have repeatedly voted to fully fund special education and to

make the funding mandatory, and I oppose efforts to roll back key

provisions of IDEA. It is time that children with disabilities

receive the quality education they deserve.

>

>

> 2. Do you believe that the Combating Autism Act provides enough

money to find the cause, or causes, of autism and effective

treatments?

>

> While Congress took an important step last year by dedicating

more than $900 million to address autism over the next five years,

more can and must be done. Resources for research should be a

central part of future autism initiatives.

>

>

> 3. How much funding will you request to study potential

environmental triggers of autism?

>

> As president, I will issue an all-hands-on deck research

challenge and dedicate the needed resources to unravel autism's

mysteries and follow wherever the science takes us.

>

>

> 4. Do you believe there is an autism epidemic in the United

States?

>

> Autism and autism spectrum disorders affect an astonishing one in

150 children. More children than ever before – a 700 percent

increase over the last decade – are being classified as having an

autism spectrum disorder. I believe that we must learn more about why

the number of children diagnosed with autism and autism spectrum

disorders has been growing.

>

>

> 5. What will you do to stop health insurers from discriminating

against people with autism and their families?

>

> I will require insurers to keep plans open to everyone and charge

fair premiums, regardless of preexisting conditions, medical history,

and other characteristics. No longer will insurance companies be able

to game the system to cover only healthy people. Several states –

including New Jersey, New York, and Washington – have led the way on

similar community rating and guaranteed issue reforms. In addition,

new national standards will ensure that all health insurance policies

offer preventive and chronic care with minimal cost-sharing.

>

>

> 6. What will you do to assure that health insurers pay for

promising new treatments and behavioral therapy?

>

> Our health care system is predominantly fee-for-service:

providers are paid for each treatment, regardless of its necessity or

quality. For example, a hospital that makes a medical error is often

paid for the error and then paid again to fix it. Our system should

pay for results, rewarding better, more efficient care.

>

> As part of my proposal to transform our health care system and

guarantee quality, affordable health care for every American,

Medicare, my new Health Care Markets and other government programs

will lead the way by paying higher rates to plans and providers that

provide the very best care and penalizing plans that fail to meet

critical, quantifiable goals.

>

> Only a small fraction — likely less than 0.1 percent — of each

health care dollar is currently devoted to systematic research and

assessment of the comparative effectiveness of various diagnostic and

therapeutic options. I will establish a non-profit or public

organization – possibly within the Institutes of Medicine – to

research the best methods of providing care, drawing upon data from

Medicare, Health Care Markets and medical experts from across the

nation. It will test devices and drugs head-to-head to see which

work best and for whom. This new organization will quickly and

widely disseminate its unbiased, scientific findings to physicians

and patients.

>

> Though we have some of the best health care technology in the

world, effective new treatments can take years to be widely adopted.

For example, until recently, many patients did not receive beta

blockers after heart attacks even though they are cheap and highly

effective. Similarly, doctors sometimes prescribe name brand drugs

despite the availability of equally effective, less expensive generic

drugs. As new diagnostics, procedures and drugs are introduced, my

new objective medical research organization will help doctors make

sense of what works best. Government programs will offer incentives

for the use of evidence-based care and treatments.

>

>

> 7. Do you think vaccines should be investigated as a possible

cause of autism?

>

> We need to step up our research efforts to find the causes of

autism, as well as better treatments. And that research must be

transparent, accountable, open to all possibilities and driven by

science.

>

>

> 8. What will you do to protect Americans, especially young

children and pregnant women, from exposure to mercury through

vaccines?

>

> I will take all necessary steps to make sure that vaccines are as

safe as possible. We must discontinue the use of potentially

dangerous additives, including mercury, in vaccines.

>

>

> 9. What will you do to provide for the lifetime care that 250,000

to 500,000 current children with autism will need in the future?

>

> Government education services for people with disabilities end at

age 21, even though the need does not, especially for many of those

with autism. Thus, families are left to care for their adult children

with disabilities largely on their own. I will work to develop

ongoing adult education and vocational and recreational programs for

those with autism. My plans for reforming the U.S. Department of

Housing and Urban Development and strengthening federal housing

policy will expand the supply of affordable supportive housing for

people with disabilities, including adults living with autism.

>

>

> 10. Would you support a large-scale federal study of the

differences in health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated

groups?

>

> As president, I will direct my Secretary of Health and Human

Services and my Directors of the Centers for Disease Control and

National Institutes of Health to follow where science takes us and to

determine which studies to undertake based on scientific evidence.

>

>

> 11. Would you support a federal right for families and

individuals to choose for themselves which vaccines they will use?

>

> I support efforts to ensure the safety of America's vaccines and

to educate families and health care providers about vaccine options.

>

>

> 12. Are you satisfied that the federal vaccine approval process

is free of conflicts of interests, transparent and rigorous?

>

> Drug companies responsible for testing drugs prior to FDA

approval have an inherent conflict of interest between their desire

to profit from new treatments and the public's interest in ensuring

safety and efficacy. I will move toward requiring fully independent

testing of drugs, including the testing of drugs compared to existing

alternatives. Information about comparative effectiveness would be

required to be made available to the FDA and to the public.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...