Transcript Of Polings on Larry King Contradicts Vaccine Apologists

[Guest guest]

At the link are both some excerpts of the show, where the attorney

says the Polings DID present evidence of an autism-vaccine link, and

the full transcript in downloadable MS Word format.

http://www.autismfathers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=29

A Lawyer's take:

THE POLINGS DID PRESENT " EVIDENCE "

The Polings presented evidence of a link by way of affidavits (written

testimony) and medical documents. They just didn't repeat that

testimony live, during a court hearing. There is no legal

distinction. Both documentary evidence and spoken evidence are

evidence. As an attorney who has tried cases in court, I can tell you

there is NO legal difference. This whole line of argument by the

vaccine apologists is complete B.S. The don't know law.

CONCEDING POLING'S CASE PREVENTED A PRECEDENT

The Poling's case WAS set to be a test case for the other 5000 pending

cases. Since the government settled it, the Poling's case is no longer

a test case for the other 5000. The reason why the government decided

to concede the Polings case before it went to hearing is obvious: the

government knew it would lose, and did not want the Poling's case to

establish an autism-vaccine link that would be legally binding in some

of the other 5000 cases. The vaccine apologists are angry because the

Poling's case HAS become binding precedent in another court, the court

of public opinion -- which is out of their control.