Guest guest Posted January 8, 2008 Report Share Posted January 8, 2008 Why is it that Andy refers to his chelation protocol as appropriate and other chelation methods as inappropriate? Well, first of all it is because his protocol was designed to take metals out of the human body in the safest way possible, considering the make up of the body and the behavior of chelators in the body. And also because adults report over, and over, and over, and over again about how awful the inappropriate chelation methods were for them and how they get better quickly and easily on Andy's protocol. In autism mercury you have a shortage of those adult reports. Here is one that came in today. Usually the inappropriate methods are combined - in this case DMPS and EDTA by IV, plus high dose oral DMSA: frequent-dose-chelation/message/21691 and usually the real report is one line in a long post, that someone could miss if they weren't following closely: " i chelated, as recommended by my doctor, with the iV edta and dmps a couple times... not much of a problem just some fatigue.. then, on the third chelation, out of nowhere.... WHAMO!, i had the worst side effects. i thought i was going to die. literally. i couldn't stand up or think. very nauseated. soo dizzy. i even programed 911 into my cell phone because i worried i wouldn't be able to dial fast enough if i was going down. this reaction was when i added in the recommended oral dmsa (100mg) the day after chelation. " I pass on these messages when I have the chance because I am concerned about parents who are getting mixed messages from doctors and experts and because of those poor young kids who can't verbalize what is happening to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.