Guest guest Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 This is one of those posts that we all need to be aware of as it affects all of us. Haddaway <iamdunroamin@...> wrote: Subject: terminator seedsWhile not all of us live in Canada, this is soimportant to us all... so read up and be aware, act ifyou are in canada. I can going to raise a fuss eventho I am in the USA.Thanks for listening > Dear News Update Subscribers,> > The ETC Group (Action Group on Erosion, Technology> and Concentration) > headquartered in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada issued a> press release (posted> below) on Monday. They received a confidential memo> that reveals that at a> United Nations meeting this week in Bangkok, the> Canadian government will> attempt to overturn an international moratorium on> Terminator seed> technology.> > The Campaign has launched an ACTION ALERT in> response:> http://www.thecampaign.org/alert_terminator.php> > Terminator seeds are genetically engineered to be> sterile and thereby> prevent farmers from saving seed. This is an> extremely risky and> controversial technology. Some scientists worry> about what could happen if> the terminator is unleashed on the environment. They> fear that terminator> technology could migrate from one farm to another,> or from a farm to wild> plants.> > And activists in developing nations are concerned> that the technology would> put too much power in the hands of a few> international agribusinesses.> > The Campaign has set up an ACTION ALERT that allows> you to send an instant> e-mail to the following Canadian officials:> 1) Prime Minister > 2) Hon. Andy , Minister of Agriculture and> Agri-Food> 3) F.B. Fadden, President, Canadian Food Inspection> Agency> > Visit the following web address to TAKE ACTION NOW:> http://www.thecampaign.org/alert_terminator.php> > Thanks for taking the time to contact these Canadian> government officials.> > Craig Winters> President> The Campaign> PO Box 55699> Seattle, WA 98155> Tel: 425-771-4049> E-mail: mailto:label@...> Web Site: http://www.thecampaign.org > >***************************************************************> > > Date: February 7, 2005> > ETC Group> News Release> 7 February 2005> www.etcgroup.org> > Canadian Government to Unleash Terminator Bombshell> at UN Meeting: All-out> push for commercialisation of Sterile Seed> Technology> > A confidential document leaked today to ETC Group> reveals that the Canadian> government, at a United Nations meeting in Bangkok> (Feb 7-11), will attempt> to overturn an international moratorium on genetic> seed sterilisation> technology (known universally as Terminator). Even> worse, the Canadian> government has instructed its negotiators to "block> consensus" on any other> option. > > "Canada is about to launch a devastating kick in the> stomach to the world's> most vulnerable farmers - the 1.4 billion people who> depend on farm saved> seed," said ETC Group Executive Director Pat Mooney> speaking from Ottawa.> "The Canadian government is doing the dirty work for> the multinational gene> giants and the US government. Even Monsanto wasn't> prepared to be this> upfront and nasty. Canada is betraying Farmers'> Rights and food sovereignty> everywhere." > > Terminator technology was first developed by the US> government and the seed> industry to prevent farmers from re-planting saved> seed and is considered> the most controversial and immoral agricultural> application of genetic> engineering so far. When first made public in 1998,> "suicide seeds"> triggered an avalanche of public opposition, forcing> Monsanto to abandon the> technology and prompting the UN Convention on> Biological Diversity (CBD) to> impose a de facto moratorium on its further> development. According to the> leaked instructions to Canadian negotiators at> SBSTTA 10 (a scientific> advisory body to the CBD), Canada will insist on> Wednesday (9 Feb.) that> governments accept the field testing and> commercialization of Terminator> varieties (referred to as GURTS -- Genetic Use> Restriction Technologies).> Canada will also attack an official UN report,> prepared by an international> expert group, which is critical of the potential> impacts of Terminator seeds> on small farmers and Indigenous Peoples. In stark> contrast to Canada's> position, the expert report recommends that> governments seek prohibitions on> the technology. > > In Bangkok, civil society and Indigenous Peoples are> calling on the Canadian> government to abandon its endorsement of Terminator> and to join with other> governments to prohibit the technology once and for> all. Many African and> Asian governments have called for Terminator to be> banned and the European> Union has also been supportive of the existing> moratorium. > > "It is outrageous that Canada is backing an> anti-farmer technology and> shameful that it will 'block consensus' on any other> outcome. Governments> from around the world must not accept this bullying> tactic," says ETC> Group's Hope Shand from the negotiations in Bangkok.> "If Canada blocks> decision-making on this issue, the moratorium will> be in jeopardy and> terminator seeds will be commercialized ending up in> the fields of small> farmers." > > The full leaked text of the Canadian government's> instructions to its> negotiators on Terminator/GURTS follows. > > Hope Shand and Jim of ETC Group can be> contacted at SBSTTA> negotiations in Bangkok on cell phone +44 (0) 7752> 106806 or by email> jim@... or hope@... > Pat Mooney (in Ottawa) +1 (613) 241-2267> etc@... > Kathy Jo Wetter (USA) +1 (919) 960-5223 email> kjo@... > > > The Head of the Canadian Delegation in Bangkok is> McLean, Environment> Canada > email .Mclean@... tel +1 (819) 997-1303 > > ***> > "Advice on the report of the Ad Hoc Technical Expert> Group on Genetic Use> Restriction Technologies (GURTS); > > Canada has major reservations regarding the> recommendations in the AHTEG> report. Canada notes that the experts were unable to> reach consensus and> that while this is recognized in para. 15 of the> report, this should have> been made clear in the recommendation section of the> report. Unfortunately,> the report leaves the impression that consensus was> achieved on all of the> recommendations when this was clearly not case and> in particular in terms of> recommendation ( which reads as follows, "In view> of the current lack of> data, recommends that Parties and other Governments> consider the development> of regulatory frameworks not to approve GURTs for> field-testing and> commercial use." > > Canada will suggest that the document clearly> indicate in the Annex that> there is no consensus on for the recommendations.> Alternatively, the AHTEG> report can be referred to as the "Chairs' report".> Canada also believes that> the AHTEG report contains scientific inaccuracies> and a lack of balance in> terms of reflecting both potential positive and> negative impacts of this> technology, and these issues should be addressed> before the report is> further distributed. We believe that it would be> beneficial for Parties and> other governments to submit comments to the> Executive Secretary/CHM to> represent national views to improve the accuracy of> the document, and that> these be made available to both the 8j working group> and COP. > > Additionally, Canada will propose that SBSTTA adopt> a recommendation for> decision at COP8 based on the revised wording of> recommendation "b" below> and will propose this recommendation be incorporated> for consideration at> the 8j meeting: > > NEW WORDING for recommendation of AHTEG report> ( In view of the current lack of data, recommend> that Parties and other> Governments consider the development of domestic> regulatory frameworks TO> ALLOW FOR THE EVALUATION OF NOVEL VARIETIES,> INCLUDING THOSE WITH GURTS, FOR> FIELD TESTING AND COMMERCIAL USE BASED ON> APPROPRIATE SCIENCE-BASED> ENVIRONMENTAL RISK/SAFETY ASSESSMENTS. > > In Canada's opinion the revised wording we are> suggesting, strengthens the> recommendation and provides for a strong scientific> assessment of risk. > > If we are unsuccessful in obtaining these additions> (indication that> recommendations in the AHTEG report were not based> on consensus OR agreement> to have national views submitted) AND changes to> recommendation "B" --or any> other outcome which clearly addresses our concern> over a defacto moratorium> on GURTS-- Canada is prepared to block consensus on> this issue." > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------->__________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.