Guest guest Posted March 14, 2008 Report Share Posted March 14, 2008 , We were using Theramedix SPS 30, Theramedix PRX, ARG Lumbrokinase, and Candex. First dose was given 3-60 minutes prior to breakfast. (All were one cap except Candex was 2 caps.) Second dose was given 30-60 minutes prior to afternoon snack (and 2 hours after lunch). Dosing was same as AM. He seemed to do okay with SPS 30. I saw some die-off and remedied it easily with charcoal. His BM remained good volume and normal. No behavior negatives, once we added charcoal. With PRX, his BM became smaller in both volume and size. I think it was the beginning of his constipation. No apparent side effects. The second day of Lumbrokinase brought really extreme head pain. It should be noted that my son is one to have head pain. Other kids tend to have rashes or other side effects, but my son has always been a head pain kid. Anyway, this head pain started on our way to school. He was screaming and clawing his carseat. This lasted about 20 minutes. He has never done anything this extreme before. (He is a 95% recovered kid, and most people have no idea he has issues). We first reduced and then stopped Lumbrokinase. Head and tummy pain remained. Then we stopped SPS 30 and PRX. Head and tummy pain are now gone. I think PRX may have been the real problem, causing constipation which lead to the head and tummy pain. We are continuing with Candex, which seems to be okay. My son IS better than he was prior to doing biofilm. We were also newly adding Sporanox at the same time (due to a big yeast problem). I think that Sporanox has really helped him, as probably has the Candex. We are going to restart SPS 30 at a small dose in about a week, so we will see if there are any benefits. On another big list, there seems to be a good number of regression before gains stories. This includes both the NaEDTA users and the non-users. Some moms ARE seeing great gains without regression. I believe that more info is supposed to be publicized at the spring DAN! think tank. Right now, the biofilm protocol is somewhat unclear and secretive. Hopefully that will change soon. The NaEDTA is supposed to remove iron, magnesium, and calcium out of the biofilm, thus helping to more effectively break down the biofilm matrix. There is one mom on another list who is have huge success with the biofilm protocol without using NaEDTA. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: mom114425 > > > > > > I'm interested in finding out Andy's opinion and thoughts about > the > > Biofilm Protocol. We have been using Mucostop, Virastop, and > > Lumbrokinase. As some people know, the Biofilm Protocol is being > done > > without NaEDTA (as well as with, of course). > > > > ===>I didn't know they were doing this protocol w/o EDTA. Just > off the top of my head I would think you watch the Mucostop carefully > as it would maybe increase constipation? > > > > However, these are all just enzymes, although Virastop is > powerful. Watch for sudden onset viruses to be released, that's what > we saw here as well as a TON of yeast, but we got improvements also. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.