Guest guest Posted January 13, 2000 Report Share Posted January 13, 2000 Are you sure it is not allowed in Europe? I have never heard that. In fact, I remember seeing several popular shampoos (Clairol Herbal Essences, Suave, etc.) when I was there two years ago. These all have SLS. Best of Health, Autumn Blum Organix Natural Health www.organix.net > > Message: 17 > Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:38:26 -0500 > From: Nelsie@... > Subject: SLS > > Though SLS (sodium lauryl sulphate) is allowed in topical products in North > America, it is not in Europe. It is allowed here because we either rinse it > off or spit it out (it's in toothpaste). That, and the petrochemicals > allowed, is the reason why I started seriously making my own toiletries and > got the business going. > > There's a lot on SLS, both pro and con, on the Internet if you want to > check it out. > > Shucky 8-) + > --<-<@ Nelsie's Cupboard/Scarborough, Ontario/M1G 1C5/Canada @>->-- > --<-<@ Tel. (416) 431-6063/Fax (416) 431-9213 @>->-- +T+ > --<-<@ URL: http://www.netcom.ca/~nelsie/welcome.html @>->-- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2000 Report Share Posted January 13, 2000 When I read the labels of all my things in my bathroom, I see SLS everywhere!!!! Even in the children shampoo. It is not forbidden here in Switzerland. And since Switzerland has the same laws in cosmetics production like the EU (European Union) I would say it's also allowed in Europe. Best wishes - Franziska Nelsie@... schrieb: > From: Nelsie@... > > Though SLS (sodium lauryl sulphate) is allowed in topical products in > North > America, it is not in Europe. -- Just A Perfect Day - The Soap Factory http://www.perfectday.ch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2000 Report Share Posted January 13, 2000 I do not think that this is a bad product for most people. However, my daughter developed a severe itching problem when she was about 4-5 years old. We noticed it most after using antibiotics, thinking it was yeast. What it really was turned out to be the red dye (FD & C Red#40) in most kids prescriptions, drinks, cereal, etc. in the U.S. However, after eliminating colors, fragrances, going to natural shoes (cotton or leather - not plastic or vinyl) and more natural cleansers (I thought), she still had some problems. Then I found out about SLS, because her scalp was always itchy. We changed shampoos, and that helped everything. I think some of it she has outgrown (she's now 13), but why put up with anything that you don't have to, if there is a good alternative? We are soaked in unnecessary chemicals in the U.S., for the convenience and profit of big manufacturers. They don't affect most people (not in an immediate sense), but that doesn't mean they are good for you! Especially in the long run! Thankfully, it is much easier to find lots of products without dyes, and without so many unnecessary chemicals. Keep the faith, Bev in Texas bevhammond@... --- Franziska Pedersen <franziska.pedersen@...> wrote: > When I read the labels of all my things in my > bathroom, I see SLS > everywhere!!!! Even in the children shampoo. It is > not forbidden here in > Switzerland. __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2000 Report Share Posted January 14, 2000 > From: B Hammond <bevhammond1@...> Then I found out about SLS, because her > scalp was always itchy. We changed shampoos, and that > helped everything You can't really conclude that. Unless ALL of the shampoos she was using before had the same ingredients, and the shampoo she switched to was exactly the same except for the lack of SLS, THEN you can say that it was caused by SLS. There are many things found in cosmetics that can cause an itchy scalp - she could have just been using a brand that's bad for her. Maybe it was the fragrance or colorant (since she has a colorant allergy anyway). The possibilities are endless, and it's really not correct to point the finger at SLS when you can't really know that for sure. Branwen Ona-Stella Enterprises http://www.ona-stella.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2000 Report Share Posted January 14, 2000 >>Then I found out about SLS, because her >> scalp was always itchy. We changed shampoos, and that >> helped everything >You can't really conclude that. Unless ALL of the shampoos she was using >before had the same ingredients, and the shampoo she switched to was exactly >the same except for the lack of SLS, THEN you can say that it was caused by >SLS. i will totally agree with branwen. i'm incredibly glad you found a shampoo that worked for your daughter, though, because i know first hand what a terribly annoying (and sometimes dangerous) thing it is to have itchy or irritated skin! when i first heard about SLS being a supposed cancer-causing agent, i did some research on it and then concluded that since my skin is so sensitive and i've had recurring bouts with various skin disorders on my scalp it was wiser to try something else. however, everything else i tried shampoo-wise left me horribly itchy and peeling from either not cleaning enough or cleaning too harshly (even plain castile soap), or else left a rash or made my hair fall out from an alternate irritation. some people say that those are an even tradeoff for not getting cancer, but they leave me that much more vulnerable to photosensitivity and skin cancers. i figured that my skin has been dealing with SLS for many years and has grown accustomed to it, and any other surfactant is as bad in its own wonderful way. i stick with sodium lauryl sulfate and avoid sodium laureth sulfate, and test out my own concoctions on my skin. right now i'm working with shampoo bars to see if i can make a formula that doesn't strip my skin. in the meanwhile, i'll opt for quality of life over potential quantity. ~risa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2000 Report Share Posted May 27, 2000 Sorry about the cross post. That message was intended for another list. Jerry & Willis Care about what you put on your skin? All natural herbal soap and aromatherapy bath products at www.heavensoap.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2001 Report Share Posted December 19, 2001 It's sodium lauryl sulfate. And then there is SLES. Here's something that Ellen sent out back in July: Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS) - SLS is used in harsh detergents and wetting agents used in garage floor cleaners, engine degreasers, and auto cleaning products. SLS is well-known in the scientific community as a common skin irritant. It is rapidly absorbed and retained in the eyes, brain, heart, and liver, which may result in harmful long-term effects. SLS could retard healing, cause cataracts in adults, and keep children's eyes from developing properly. This is a very common ingredient in toothpastes and may be linked to one cause of gums receding because of the everyday, prolonged use. Also, commonly found in shampoos and bubble baths, it is absorbed through skin contact and has been shown to be retained for up to 5 days in eye tissue. It is extremely harmful to young children when eyes are developing. Statistics show more and more people having to wear glasses or contacts. Maybe we have a reason why? Sodium Laureth Sulfate (SLES) - SLES is the alcohol form (ethoxylated) of SLS. It is slightly less irritating than SLS, but may cause more drying. Both SLS and SLES may cause potentially carcinogenic formation of nitrates and dioxins to form in shampoos and cleansers by reacting with other product ingredients. Large amounts of nitrates may enter the blood system from just one shampooing. And here's something I recently came across: SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE (SLES). Chemical Name: Sodium Lauryl " Ether " Sulfate An ether chain is added to SLS. Called a premium agent in cleansers and shampoos. In reality, it is very inexpensive, but thickens when salt is added in the formula and produces high levels of foam to give the concentrated illusion it is thick, rich and expensive. Used as a wetting agent in the textile industry. Irritation to scalp and may cause hair loss (). SEE SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE. SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE. We examined an anionic detergent Sodium Lauryl Sulfate, which is commonly found in soaps and shampoos, that showed penetration into the eyes, as well as systemic tissues (brain, heart, liver, etc.). SLS also showed long-term retention in tissues. Because SLS and related substances are widely used in many populations on a daily basis in soaps and shampoos, there is an immediate concern relating to the penetration of these chemicals into the eyes and other tissues. This is especially important in infants, where considerable growth is occurring, because a much greater uptake occurs by tissues of younger eyes, and SLS changes the amounts of some proteins in cells from eye tissues. Tissues of young eyes may be more susceptible to alternation by SLS (Green). Forms nitrates, a possible carcinogen when used in shampoos and cleansers containing nitrogen-based ingredients. These nitrates can enter the bloodstream in large numbers from shampooing, bubble baths, shaving gels, bath and shower gels and facial cleansers. These synthetic substances are used in shampoos for their detergent and foam-building abilities. They can cause eye iritations, skin rashes, hair loss, scalp scurf similar to dandruff and allergic reactions. They are frequently disguised in pseudo-natural cosmetics with the parenthetic explanation " comes from coconut. " Let's save the coconut from defamation of character and NOT USE products with sodium lauryl sulfate, etc! (Hampton). Dr. H. Fine, the chemist who uncovered NDELA contamination in cosmetics, estimates that a person would be applying 50 to 100 micrograms of Nitrosamine to the skin each time he or she used a nitrosamine contaminated cosmetic. By comparison, a person consuming sodium nitrite preserved bacon is exposed to less than 1 microgram of Nitrosamine (Hampton). BIBLIOGRAPHY Begoin, a Blue Eyeshadow Should Still be Legal, (Beginning Press, 1988) Brumberg, Elaine Take Care of Your Skin (Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., 1989) Chase, Deborah The New Medically-Based No-Nonsense Beauty Book, (Henry Holt and Co., 1989) Environmental Protection Agency 20 Most Common Chemicals Found in 31 Fragrance Products. 1991 Friend, Tim USA Today, 4/10/90 Green, Dr. Detergent Penetration Into Young and Adult Eyes (Dept. of Opthamology, Medical College of GA, Augusta, GA) Hampton, Aubrey Dictionary of Cosmetic Ingredients (Organics Press) Metarasso, Dr. Seth L. " Faking It " - (Muscle & Fitness, November 1990) Novick, Dr. Lee Super Skin, (ston, N. Potter, Inc. Publishers,1988) Strega, " Sweet Nerve Gas " - Shared Vision Magazine. December 1993 Valmy, & Vons Ulrich, Elise " Mid-Air Skin Care " ( Entrepreneurial Woman, July/August 1990 ) Winter, Ruth A Consumer's Dictionary of Cosmetic Ingredients, (Crown Publishers, Inc. 1989) , Camille S. Shampoo Report, (Images International, Inc. 1989) In a message dated 12/19/2001 7:56:43 PM Central Standard Time, tgdamron@... writes: > what is SLS? > The Four Stages Of Life 1. You believe in Santa Claus 2. You don't believe in Santa Claus 3. You are Santa Claus 4. You look like Santa Claus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2002 Report Share Posted January 1, 2002 My husband swears that since I have switched him from Irish Spring to a non-SLS soap that his athlete's foot is going away. Does anyone have info on SMS? Laurie>oh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2002 Report Share Posted January 30, 2002 >Subject: Fw: Check your hair shampoo >is this >another marketing scheme to get people to buy Vidal Sasson? To those who >make shampoo, is there any truth in this story? >>Sodium Laureth Sulphate Urban legend - check it out on Swopes. SLS CAN be irritating and drying to your skin when used in high concentrations but, especially in rinse-off products (as shampoos), isn't going to hurt you - unless you get it in your eyes or something (and it is used in rather low concentrations in body care products). I can't use it in anything as a facial or body cleanser because I have extra sensitive skin and it causes my skin to dry out and flake. Many people have no trouble with it. Tonya K. -- Tonya R. Ketchum - tyrtate@... Granny Rose Botanicals http://www.grannyrosebotanicals.com __________________________________________________________________ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2005 Report Share Posted February 23, 2005 Toni wrote: Good Morning all, (I just love how my email picks up the color). This was posted by someone on the raw foods group. With her permission I am posting here and wondering what you all think. The last link suggests maybe this is an urban legend. My inquiring mind wants to know:) Have a beautiful day all Tone Sodium Lauryl Sulfate and Sodium Laureth Sulfate This inexpensive detergent is commonly used in cosmetic cleansers, hair shampoos, bath and shower gels, bubble baths, etc. - It is probably the most dangerous ingredient used in skin and hair-care products. In the cleaning industry SLS is used in garage floor cleaners, engine degreasers, car-wash soaps, etc. It is very corrosive and readily attacks greasy surfaces. Sodium lauryl sulfate is used throughout the world for clinical testing as a primary skin irritant. Laboratories use it to irritate skin on test animals and humans so that they may then test healing agents to see how effective they are on the irritated skin. A recent study at the University of Georgia Medical College, indicated that SLS penetrated Into the eyes as well as brain, heart, liver, etc., and showed long-term retention in the tissues. The study also indicated that SLS penetrated young children's eyes from developing properly and caused cataracts to develop In adults. May cause hair loss by attacking the follicle. Classified as a drug in bubble baths because It eats away skin protection and causes rashes and infection to occur. Is potentially harmful to skin and hair. Cleans by corrosion. Dries skin by stripping the protective lipids from the surface so it can't effectively regulate moisture. Another extremely serious problem is the connection of SLS with nitrate contamination. SLS reacts with many types of ingredients used in skin products and forms nitrosomines (nitrates). Nitrates are potential cancer-causing carcinogenics. Because of the alarming penetrating power of SLS, large amounts of these known carcinogens are absorbed through the skin into the body. A variation of SLS is SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE (Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate- SLES). It exhibits many of the same characteristics and is a higher-foaming variation of SLS. A typical MSDS Data sheet on Sodium Lauryl Sulfate: Read about the governments: SLS Alert Study from Norway on dangers of Sodium lauryl sulfate and recurrent aphthous ulcers Short Important Article on Sodium Laurel Sulfate (SLS) For safe, effective products without Sodium Lauryl sulfate, visit www.ineways.com/shelleykramer back to www.healthy-communications.com http://www.snopes.com/toxins/shampoo.htm ================================================== Okay you asked. SLS is toxic. Period. It is a synthetic chemical. It does not occur naturally in nature, contrary to what a lot of companies will tell you. It has to be processed out of coconuts using synthetic chemicals. It will penetrate your skin and can and will cause health problems. Yes, it is used to clean engines and driveways. It will strip the natural oils from your hair and skin. I do not know about the cataracts though. I will not buy a commercially prepared shampoo or conditioner. I will not use SLS in my own soaps either. I prefer not to use anything that may be hazardous to my health. Sometimes this is a really hard thing to achieve. However, I do my best to cut out all synthetics or chemically derived chemicals. I also don't know about the nitrate aspect either so I can't comment on that one. I just know that I will not use any product that has it in it. This is one of the reasons why I make my own soap too. I do not know if this stuff is carcinogenic or not. I really am not interested in testing this theory out. All detergents are synthetic. Synthetic chemicals have not been proven to be safe for anyone. Sometimes I really wonder about Snopes. I am beginning to question how well they do their research. I also am beginning to believe that their interests lie not with our good health but more in line with the FDA, USDA, etc. But that is just my observation. Per the Merck Index: Anionic detergent prepared bhy sulfation of lauryl alcohol, followed by neutralization with sodium carbonate. Here is a brief on how they make lauryl alcohol. Doesn't sound real natural to me. LAURYL ALCOHOL [Dodecyl alcohol] Submitted by S. G. Ford and C. S. Marvel. Checked by C. Whitmore and D. J. Loder. 1. Procedure The central neck of a 5-l. three-necked round-bottomed flask is fitted with a stopper carrying a mercury-sealed mechanical stirrer. One of the side necks is connected by means of a short piece of heavy rubber tubing to a large reflux condenser about 2 m. long, with an inner tube 2.5 cm. in diameter (Note 1). The third neck is fitted with a separatory funnel. In the flask are placed 70 g. (3 moles) of sodium and 200 cc. of dry toluene (Note 2). The flask is heated in an oil bath until the sodium is melted. The stirrer is then started; when the sodium is finely divided, the oil bath is removed and the mixture allowed to cool. Stirring must be continued during the cooling in order to keep the sodium finely divided. When the mixture has cooled to about 60°, there are added from the separatory funnel, first, a solution of 114 g. (0.5 mole) of ethyl laurate (Note 3) in 150 cc. of absolute alcohol (Note 4), then 500 cc. more of alcohol, as rapidly as is possible (Note 5) without loss of material through the condenser. The time required for the addition of the ester solution and the alcohol is less than five minutes, usually two or three minutes. When the reaction has subsided, the flask is heated on a steam bath until the sodium is completely dissolved (Note 6). The mixture is then steam-distilled to remove the toluene and ethyl alcohol. The contents of the flask are transferred to a separatory funnel while still hot and washed three times with 200-cc. portions of hot water to remove the sodium laurate (Note 7). The lauryl alcohol is extracted with ether from the cooled mixture and the washings. The combined ether extracts are washed with water, sodium carbonate solution, and again with water, and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The ether is evaporated and the lauryl alcohol distilled under diminished pressure. The yield is 60–70 g. (65–75 per cent of the theoretical amount) of a product boiling at 143–146°/18 mm. or 198–200°/135 mm. (Note 8). 2. Notes 1. The reaction is very vigorous and, unless the condenser has a wide bore, finely divided sodium may be forced out the top and bad fires may result. The inner tube of the condenser may advantageously be made of brass or copper. 2. The toluene is dried by distillation; the first 10 per cent is discarded and the remainder is stored over sodium until used. 3. The ethyl laurate used was prepared by the alcoholysis of cocoanut oil and fractionation of the resulting esters. The material boiled at 127–132°/5 mm. See Org. Syn. 20, 69, and Organic Chemical Reagents III, Univ. Illinois Bull. 19 (6) 62 (1921). 4. The grade of absolute alcohol used in the reduction is very important. Alcohol dried with magnesium methoxide (Org. Syn. Coll. Vol. I, 1941, 249) was used in this preparation. Alcohol dried over lime gives very low yields. 5. The best yields are obtained when the reductions are carried out rapidly. If the reaction seems to be about to get out of control, the stirrer is stopped and the mixture is cooled with an ice pack. 6. When several reductions are being made, time is saved by transferring the mixture at this point to another flask, thus having the original apparatus ready for another reduction. 7. Unless the sodium laurate is carefully removed, it causes trouble some emulsions. 8. Ethyl undecylenate has been reduced to undecylenyl alcohol (b.p. 123–125°/6 mm.) in 70 per cent yields; ethyl myristate to myristyl alcohol (b.p. 170–173°/20 mm.; m.p. 39–39.5°) in 70–80 per cent yields; ethyl palmitate to cetyl alcohol (b.p. 178–182°/12 mm.; m.p. 48.5–49.5°) in 70–78 per cent yields by this same procedure. 3. Discussion Lauryl alcohol has been prepared by the reduction of the aldehyde;1 by the reduction of esters of lauric acid with sodium and absolute alcohol2 or with sodium, liquid ammonia and absolute alcohol,3 or catalytically;4 and by the reduction of lauramide with sodium and amyl alcohol.5 The method in the above procedure is essentially that described by Levene and .2 This preparation is referenced from: Org. Syn. Coll. Vol. 2, 246 Org. Syn. Coll. Vol. 2, 468 -- Peace, love and light, Don "Quai" Eitner "Spirit sleeps in the mineral, breathes in the vegetable, dreams in the animal and wakes in man." In compliance with the highest standards of Universal Law, this email has been thoroughly disinfected and purified in the solar flares of the sun. Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.306 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2005 Report Share Posted February 23, 2005 I also make my own soaps and lotions.. have not gotten to the shampoo making yet... but I do not use SLS in my soaps... i do use SLSA in my bath bombs tho and it is supposed to be much more mild then SLS.... I also understand that the cancer causing is not really the SLS but the combo on ingredients that are used in making the commerical shampoos today.... i can not find the article i once had explaining this.... and what that other ingredient was....I was also told of Sodium Coco Sulfate which is a naturally derived alternative to Sodium Lauryl Sulfate.. http://www.chemistrystore.com/sodiumcocosulfate.htm Lynn there are alot of good anti-perspirants out there that you can make your own self... pearlmoon@... wrote: Don You say you make your own soap? Would you mind posting your recipe for it? I have a couple recipes for natural soaps but one more can't hurt. I'd be grateful. I want to get into making most of my own personal products instead of going to the store for them. I have recipes for shampoo, deodorant, powder, tooth cleansers, and even perfume. I have not started to make soap yet. The only thing I can't seem to do without is the antiperspirant. I know it's not that good for me but I just can't stand the feeling of sweaty underarms. lol Between making most of my own products and eating simi-raw and my juice cleanses I'm starting to feel a bit better. It took some time. I have even lost a few pounds. Which is good for me because of my back problems it's hard for me to do hard exercise. I walk as much as I can. Sometimes though, the pain overcomes me and I have to stop. But so far so good. So, when you have some time if you could post that it would be a big help. Thanks Don. Many Blessings Lynn I will not buy a commercially prepared shampoo or conditioner. I will not use SLS in my own soaps either. I prefer not to use anything that may be hazardous to my health. Sometimes this is a really hard thing to achieve. However, I do my best to cut out all synthetics or chemically derived chemicals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.