Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: New sufferer

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Basicly, you should be able to eat anything that does not have oil and

fat. You don't want to eat anything that you are allergic to, as well,

high allergen foods include wheat, corn, peanuts, strawberries, etc.,

your body will tell you if you are allergic. BUT by avoiding these

things you are not triggering the flow of bile that is so important to

cleansing the liver and just contributes to the formation of more stones,

so that is why so many decide to either have their gall bladders

removed, or to do the flush (like myself) or both. As time goes on,

you will find that eating just about anything triggers trouble as your

bile ducts and gall bladder get more and more congested. If you

aren't ready to do the full flush, you may want to at least keep the

liver moving bile in the morning first thing, by drinking a cup of chamomile

tea with juice of 1/2 to 1 lemon and a tablespoon of flax seed oil, then

wait at least 20 minutes before eating.

This may trigger a little bit of discomfort, but shouldn't cause as

much as you are describing. This will at least keep the bile moving

a bit at a time when you are up and about. Doing this daily will

slowly clean a little bit from your gall bladder, but the flush is the

" real deal " . I'm sure you'll get a lot of help on this list. I did :-)

L. Meydrech, CN

" A cheerful heart is good medicine... " Prov. 17:22a

http://nutritionist.tripod.com/gallbladder.html ~ My Flushes

http://nutritionist.tripod.com ~ Journey to Health

I've been here reading for about 15 months now. I came down with gallstone in

December of 2000. I purchased and ate about 1 kilo of cooked shrimp and a bottle

of wine. Early that next morning I woke up with the worst pain I have ever felt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thank you for the wonderful information.

What do you all think about using " Actigall " to dissolve them? I was reading

about that on Webmd.com last night, and there is also the thing where they use

ultrasound to pulverize the stones. Is that any good?

----- Original Message -----

From: L. Meydrech

gallstones

Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 3:04 PM

Subject: Re: New sufferer

Basicly, you should be able to eat anything that does not have oil and

fat. You don't want to eat anything that you are allergic to, as well,

high allergen foods include wheat, corn, peanuts, strawberries, etc.,

Life is like a doughnut

Either you are in the dough

or you are in the hole!

To get out of the hole click below

http://www.prepaidlegal.com/go/cgb

http://card.netscape.com/douneedemploy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Allo,

To which flush are you referring ? I've seen reports here from people who

said they flushed, and then became extremely ill They then had to go to the

emergency room where they assumed room temperature.

----- Original Message -----

From: L. Meydrech

gallstones

Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 3:04 PM

Subject: Re: New sufferer

Basicly, you should be able to eat anything that does not have oil and

fat. You don't want to eat anything that you are allergic to, as well,

high allergen foods include wheat, corn, peanuts, strawberries, etc.,

your body will tell you if you are allergic. BUT by avoiding these

things you are not triggering the flow of bile that is so important to

cleansing the liver and just contributes to the formation of more stones,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I did the one that is like Hulda s, have known about the flush

for 15+ years, and add different things I learn, it's at my web site in

the link in my signature lines that says " gallbladder " at the end. Have

you had an ultrasound to see how large your stones are??

L. Meydrech, CN

http://nutritionist.tripod.com/gallbladder.html ~ My Flushes

http://nutritionist.tripod.com ~ Journey to Health & Auctions

" A cheerful heart is good medicine " Prov. 17:22a

----- Original Message -----

From: Gault

gallstones

Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 5:49 PM

Subject: Re: New sufferer

Allo,

To which flush are you referring ? I've seen reports here from people

who said they flushed, and then became extremely ill They then had to go to the

emergency room where they assumed room temperature.

----- Original Message -----

From: L. Meydrech

gallstones

Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 3:04 PM

Subject: Re: New sufferer

Basicly, you should be able to eat anything that does not have oil and

fat. You don't want to eat anything that you are allergic to, as well,

high allergen foods include wheat, corn, peanuts, strawberries, etc.,

your body will tell you if you are allergic. BUT by avoiding these

things you are not triggering the flow of bile that is so important to

cleansing the liver and just contributes to the formation of more stones,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi ,

Maybe I can answer a few questions for you. First of all, have you

tried a liver/gallbladder cleanse? How many? What does your

ultrasound show? How many stones? What sizes are they?

It's hard to advise any kind of information without knowing more

about what your particular condition is.

Actigall ; This is a medication that is only helpful in reducing

cholesterol stones over several months to up to a year. It is an

expensive medication and stones will return later if you are not on a

strict diet, thinning and conditioning your bile to also avoid futher

formation of stones. Calcium (hard) stones are not effected by

Actigall. Diarrhea may accompany the medication.

Lithotripsy ; This is an ultrasonic sound wave stone crushing method

that is very successful for kidney stones and is now sometimes being

offered for gallstones. Candidates for the method would be people

with less than 4 stones in their gb, no stones larger than 2 cm, and

cholesterol based stones. Calcium stones once again are not effected

by the shock wave treatment. It only takes around one hour to break

up the stones, and Actigall is recommended afterwards to further

desolve the small pieces to help them exit through the cystic duct.

A good flush would help get those smaller pieces out faster than

Actigall. The combination of flushing and crushing would be great but

the general medical field does not consider flushing a 'viable' means

of gallstone removal. Also, for Lithotrisy, you need to know what

kind of stones you have, the number and sizes, to be a candidate.

Insurance may not cover the $5,000 procedure. You'd have to ask your

insurance provider if Lithotripsy is even covered. Since, stones

return in 50% of the cases over 1 year, insurance may not consider it

a cost effect way to treat gallstones. Like putting a bandaide on the

problem only to have you return every year to get the treatment.

Hope this helps in some way. Knowing your condition would help those

of us in this group to be able to offer more accurate information

that could help you improve your health.

Good luck. Be Healthy and Happy.

Barry.

> Thank you for the wonderful information.

>

> What do you all think about using " Actigall " to dissolve them? I

was reading about that on Webmd.com last night, and there is also

the thing where they use ultrasound to pulverize the stones. Is that

any good?

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: L. Meydrech

> gallstones@y...

> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 3:04 PM

> Subject: Re: New sufferer

>

>

> Basicly, you should be able to eat anything that does not have

oil and

> fat. You don't want to eat anything that you are allergic to, as

well,

> high allergen foods include wheat, corn, peanuts, strawberries,

etc.,

>

> Life is like a doughnut

> Either you are in the dough

> or you are in the hole!

> To get out of the hole click below

>

> http://www.prepaidlegal.com/go/cgb

>

> http://card.netscape.com/douneedemploy

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Aren't kidney stones calcium-based stones? I read this somewhere. If sound waves

work on kidney stones, shouldn't it work on a calcium stone in the gallbladder

as well?

Just wondering,

liz

" barry91162 " <barry91162@...> wrote:

>Lithotripsy ; This is an ultrasonic sound wave stone crushing method

>that is very successful for kidney stones and is now sometimes being

>offered for gallstones. Candidates for the method would be people

>with less than 4 stones in their gb, no stones larger than 2 cm, and

>cholesterol based stones. Calcium stones once again are not effected

>by the shock wave treatment. It only takes around one hour to break

>up the stones, and Actigall is recommended afterwards to further

>desolve the small pieces to help them exit through the cystic duct.

__________________________________________________________________

Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience

the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape!

http://shopnow.netscape.com/

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at

http://webmail.netscape.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Liz,

I'm not sure if kidney stones are calcium based. Further research

should easily answer that question. Nevertheless, if kidney stones do

have calcium it would be of another type of consistancy than what a

calcium gallstone is made of and also in the manner that it has

formed. For this reason, the calcium gallstone will only bounce

around in the gallbladder during shock wave treatment and the kidney

stone (if it is calcium based as you say) would be of a softer form

of consistancy and could break up inside the kidney organ easier.

Also it would depend on what other ingredients are in the makeup of a

kidney stone. This is also the reason that Lithotripsy is used for

kidney stones but is not always successful for gallstones, even if

they both have some form of calcium in them. Hope this makes sense.

Just a thought.

Barry.

>

> >Lithotripsy ; This is an ultrasonic sound wave stone crushing

method

> >that is very successful for kidney stones and is now sometimes

being

> >offered for gallstones. Candidates for the method would be people

> >with less than 4 stones in their gb, no stones larger than 2 cm,

and

> >cholesterol based stones. Calcium stones once again are not

effected

> >by the shock wave treatment. It only takes around one hour to

break

> >up the stones, and Actigall is recommended afterwards to further

> >desolve the small pieces to help them exit through the cystic

duct.

>

>

>

> __________________________________________________________________

> Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas.

Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape!

http://shopnow.netscape.com/

>

> Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at

http://webmail.netscape.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
Guest guest

Andy,

Welcome to the group. Only a very select few qualify for admittance to

our little world :-).

>

>

> My questions are

> Does this seem like an appropriate cause of treatment?

If you've read the recent posts, you will see that there is a LOT of

sentiment AGAINST botox. From what you said, your consultant seems to

favor dilation over surgery. You might ask why. There are advocates of

both positions here.

> What can i expect over the coming years (is this a progressive

> disease)?

It is a progressive disease. I was told that I would eventually have

to have a tube inserted in my throat. But the treatments provide

significant improvement for most people for several decades.

> Have people found that certain foods/liquids or changes in

lifestyle

> have helped the symptoms?

There are certain foods that are difficult to eat (for me, fibrous

things like beef, broccoli, oranges, and potatoes), and many people

blame certain foods for causing chest pains (we usually call them

'spasms'). I also have trouble drinking beer. As with just about any

disease, stress makes the symptoms worse. I don't know if anyone here

has tried meditation or bio-feedback to lessen the sympoms.

> How major are the surgery options that are avaiable?

The surgery (Heller myotomy) isn't all that bad, especially if your

surgeon is trained in laparoscopic techniques. It's a procedure that

has been in use for almost a century, and the risks are low. The pain

was much less than I expected. Typically, people are in the hospital

for 2 days. The time until resumption of nornal eating (at least as

normal as it will ever be) varies from a few days to a few weeks.

Jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Andy,

Welcome.I was diagnosed in 1988 with " A " .I have never had botox so I

can't comment much on it.I have had ballon dilations which only helped

a short time.I just learned to deal with it until last year when I

started having problems with liquids.I had Heller's myotomy done in dec

04.No better after that I had a dilation done 3wks after surgery. Still

no improvement.So April 26th I am sceduled for esophagectomy.Please

don't let my story scare you but I just want to stress to other " A "

suffers not to wait to long for treatment like I did.Due to my own

ignorance. Thinking surgery was the last resort for this condition

my " E " is so enlarged that the myotomy didn't work.I have learned so

much from this and wish I would have known about it yrs ago.You will

see that it is full of caring people that know what you are dealing

with.My best excuse for leaving table is all the water I drink to get

my food down.

Sherry from Ohio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Sherry:

Thanks for your articulate post this evening. Your story helps me to know that

I am on the

right course getting the treatment earlier in the process. I saw a specialist

at Cedars today

and am meeting with a surgeon in two weeks. The dr said I am early in the

progression --

so I will take your advice!

Thanks again

Peggy

>

> Hi Andy,

> Welcome.I was diagnosed in 1988 with " A " .I have never had botox so I

> can't comment much on it.I have had ballon dilations which only helped

> a short time.I just learned to deal with it until last year when I

> started having problems with liquids.I had Heller's myotomy done in dec

> 04.No better after that I had a dilation done 3wks after surgery. Still

> no improvement.So April 26th I am sceduled for esophagectomy.Please

> don't let my story scare you but I just want to stress to other " A "

> suffers not to wait to long for treatment like I did.Due to my own

> ignorance. Thinking surgery was the last resort for this condition

> my " E " is so enlarged that the myotomy didn't work.I have learned so

> much from this and wish I would have known about it yrs ago.You will

> see that it is full of caring people that know what you are dealing

> with.My best excuse for leaving table is all the water I drink to get

> my food down.

> Sherry from Ohio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Andy,

Welcome to the group. I don't know if you can download these attachments - I

hope so - they will give you some of the information you need.

Good wishes

Joan

New Sufferer

>

>

> Hi all

>

> Hope someone here might be able to help; My name is Andy and i am a

> 27 year old male from the UK and have recently been diagnosed with

> Achalasia. I have had endless tests over the past year (several of

> which seemed to be exactly the same???); I have also recently had

> Botox injections into the muscle (that did not go well as i ended up

> spending 3 nights in hospital with chest pains!) this did not help

> the situation at all. I have now lost 60lbs in the last 6 months

> (though this was not all bad) and am a little concerned to say the

> least. My consultant does not really appear to know a great deal

> about the problem but has mentioned that the next step would be a

> balloon dilation then followed by open chest surgery if that failed.

>

> My questions are

> Does this seem like an appropriate cause of treatment?

> What can i expect over the coming years (is this a progressive

> disease)?

> Have people found that certain foods/liquids or changes in lifestyle

> have helped the symptoms?

> How major are the surgery options that are avaiable?

>

> Any help that anyone out there could provide would be very much

> appreciated. Also has anyone come up with any good excuses for

> having to repeatedly leave the table when attempting to eat out?

>

> Thanks in Advance

> Andy

> Gloucestershire

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...