Guest guest Posted April 2, 2002 Report Share Posted April 2, 2002 In a message dated 4/2/02 10:26:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, claudiameydrech@... writes: > Thanks for your explanation...yes, I know, I believe that most of what > we pass is cholesterol, and that true stones would be hard w/ calcium. > Most sources I've read refer to both cholesterol and calcium as " stones " . Since both excess cholesterol and excess calcium can cause problems, I think that whatever comes out is a step in the right direction. just my .02 rachel~ " Whether you think you can or think you can't, you're right " - Henry Ford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2002 Report Share Posted April 2, 2002 In a message dated 4/2/02 11:03:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, barry91162@... writes: > Whatever the case, flushing will clean out toxins, gunk, sludge, > sandy 'pre-forming' stones, liver globs of stagnant bile, hard > gallstones, intestinal sludge and parasites, colon toxins and > stagnant waste from the entire digestive system. And to me, personally, that's the important thing. I'm not so concerned with classifications of stones as I am with how my health is affected by the flushing. Respecting the choice of those who desire to hash this all out... rachel~ " Whether you think you can or think you can't, you're right " - Henry Ford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2002 Report Share Posted April 3, 2002 & , Yes you are right on both counts. But some clarification is needed here. Most gallstones (90%) that are hard because of a crusty shell of cholesterol or hard throughout are made of cholesterol. Calcium stones are very rare and make up a very small number of hard gallstones. The soft pea green liver stones are globs of cholesterol which has not been fully extracted of water (as it would in the gb therefore making it become hard) and is a combination of water, the ingredience of bile and the combination of oil mixed in the internal labratory of the body. The fasting (or not even fasting) during a flush will help the absorbtion of water out of the bile ingredience and form globs as it passes through the intestine and colon areas. Knowing the difference will help to understand the eliminations of either gallstones vs. liver bile extracted of water and combined with flushing. Whatever the case, flushing will clean out toxins, gunk, sludge, sandy 'pre-forming' stones, liver globs of stagnant bile, hard gallstones, intestinal sludge and parasites, colon toxins and stagnant waste from the entire digestive system. Also, the extra oil within the body will help to make many of your bodily systems to function better. Feeling better and having healthier insides is a great benefit of cleansing your digestive system. Be Healthy. Barry. > In a message dated 4/2/02 10:26:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, > claudiameydrech@c... writes: > > > > Thanks for your explanation...yes, I know, I believe that most of what > > we pass is cholesterol, and that true stones would be hard w/ calcium. > > > > Most sources I've read refer to both cholesterol and calcium as " stones " . > Since both excess cholesterol and excess calcium can cause problems, I think > that whatever comes out is a step in the right direction. > > just my .02 > > rachel~ > > " Whether you think you can or think you can't, you're right " - Henry Ford > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2002 Report Share Posted April 3, 2002 Are those dark green stones I get (I can take them apart) just globs of stagnant bile? ----- Original Message ----- From: <Rachd1961@...> <gallstones > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:11 PM Subject: Re: Re: stone types > In a message dated 4/2/02 11:03:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, > barry91162@... writes: > > > > Whatever the case, flushing will clean out toxins, gunk, sludge, > > sandy 'pre-forming' stones, liver globs of stagnant bile, hard > > gallstones, intestinal sludge and parasites, colon toxins and > > stagnant waste from the entire digestive system. > > And to me, personally, that's the important thing. I'm not so concerned > with classifications of stones as I am with how my health is affected by the > flushing. > > Respecting the choice of those who desire to hash this all out... > > rachel~ > > " Whether you think you can or think you can't, you're right " - Henry Ford > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2002 Report Share Posted April 4, 2002 , Stones ARE globs of stagnant bile that is forming into hard stones if left too long in the body. Stones come from your bile. Cholesterol is found in your bile which makes up 90% of stones. Calcium (pigment) stones are more rare. Cholesterol stones can either be soft and pea green throughout. Or, they can have a cholesterol shell which makes them hard-er on the outside. Cholesterol stones can also be 'crusty' throughout. Calcium and/or pigment stones will be as hard as marbles and not really squishable or crusty. Hope this helps in some way. I guess I really don't understand exactly what the question is. Barry. > Are those dark green stones I get (I can take them apart) just globs of > stagnant bile? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <Rachd1961@a...> > <gallstones@y...> > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:11 PM > Subject: Re: Re: stone types > > > > In a message dated 4/2/02 11:03:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, > > barry91162@y... writes: > > > > > > > Whatever the case, flushing will clean out toxins, gunk, sludge, > > > sandy 'pre-forming' stones, liver globs of stagnant bile, hard > > > gallstones, intestinal sludge and parasites, colon toxins and > > > stagnant waste from the entire digestive system. > > > > And to me, personally, that's the important thing. I'm not so concerned > > with classifications of stones as I am with how my health is affected by > the > > flushing. > > > > Respecting the choice of those who desire to hash this all out... > > > > rachel~ > > > > " Whether you think you can or think you can't, you're right " - Henry Ford > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2002 Report Share Posted April 4, 2002 My confusion is: are the *stones* I am getting out just recently formed (due to the flush) globs of bile OR are they *stones* that have accumulated b/c I have been sick with CFS and I have more toxicity than my liver can handle. ----- Original Message ----- From: " barry91162 " <barry91162@...> <gallstones > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:55 PM Subject: Re: stone types > , > > Stones ARE globs of stagnant bile that is forming into hard stones if > left too long in the body. Stones come from your bile. Cholesterol is > found in your bile which makes up 90% of stones. Calcium (pigment) > stones are more rare. > > Cholesterol stones can either be soft and pea green throughout. Or, > they can have a cholesterol shell which makes them hard-er on the > outside. Cholesterol stones can also be 'crusty' throughout. > > Calcium and/or pigment stones will be as hard as marbles and not > really squishable or crusty. > > Hope this helps in some way. I guess I really don't understand > exactly what the question is. > > Barry. > > > > > > Are those dark green stones I get (I can take them apart) just > globs of > > stagnant bile? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <Rachd1961@a...> > > <gallstones@y...> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:11 PM > > Subject: Re: Re: stone types > > > > > > > In a message dated 4/2/02 11:03:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, > > > barry91162@y... writes: > > > > > > > > > > Whatever the case, flushing will clean out toxins, gunk, sludge, > > > > sandy 'pre-forming' stones, liver globs of stagnant bile, hard > > > > gallstones, intestinal sludge and parasites, colon toxins and > > > > stagnant waste from the entire digestive system. > > > > > > And to me, personally, that's the important thing. I'm not so > concerned > > > with classifications of stones as I am with how my health is > affected by > > the > > > flushing. > > > > > > Respecting the choice of those who desire to hash this all out... > > > > > > rachel~ > > > > > > " Whether you think you can or think you can't, you're right " - > Henry Ford > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2002 Report Share Posted April 4, 2002 At 07:51 04.04.2002 -0500, you wrote: >My confusion is: are the *stones* I am getting out just recently formed (due >to the flush) globs of bile OR are they *stones* that have accumulated b/c I >have been sick with CFS and I have more toxicity than my liver can handle. Or you got CFS because you developed stones in the first place, inside your liver and GB, and due to stones, your liver was unable to properly detox blood and whole body, causing toxins to accumulate inside tissues .... Or those stones that you got in the first place have been developed to prevent your bowel reabsorbing strong toxins (mercury, pesticides, lead, ....) that have been too high inside your body ... and your liver may continue producing stones, as that is the only safe way of preventing reabsorption of toxins that have been dumped with bile ... Do we really have to know the answers to all questions? or, cant we just be satisfied with results and keep cleansing .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2002 Report Share Posted April 4, 2002 Barry, I am intrigued by this possibility. Is this something you have read somewhere. I think sometimes it is important to know the possibilities so we can prevent reformation. Dawn > > Or those stones that you got in the first place have been developed to > prevent your bowel reabsorbing strong toxins (mercury, pesticides, lead, > ...) that have been too high inside your body ... and your liver may > continue producing stones, as that is the only safe way of preventing > reabsorption of toxins that have been dumped with bile ... > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2002 Report Share Posted April 4, 2002 Dawn: I think Agnes provided this info. Yes, in my case, it is important to know the cause so I can stop it and get rid of this CFS. I am continually checking something. My amalgams ar eout, cavitations cleaned, toxic teeth out and now I'm working on my sinus. ----- Original Message ----- From: " azdmarie " <nortons@...> <gallstones > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:26 AM Subject: Re: stone types > Barry, I am intrigued by this possibility. Is this something you have > read somewhere. I think sometimes it is important to know the > possibilities so we can prevent reformation. Dawn > > > > > Or those stones that you got in the first place have been developed > to > > prevent your bowel reabsorbing strong toxins (mercury, pesticides, > lead, > > ...) that have been too high inside your body ... and your liver > may > > continue producing stones, as that is the only safe way of > preventing > > reabsorption of toxins that have been dumped with bile ... > > > > > > > Learn more from our experience, more then 200 liver > flush stories: http:///messages/gallstones-testimonials > > Liver Cleanse Recipe: http://www.CureZone.com/cleanse/liver/ > Liver Flush FAQ: http://curezone.com/forums/forum.asp?ForumID=73 > > Images: > http://CureZone.com/image_gallery/cleanse_flush/ > http://CureZone.com/image_gallery/intrahepatic_stones/ > > To unsubscribe, sned blank e-mail to: gallstones-unsubscribe and then reply to confirmation message! > > To Post message: gallstones > Subscribe: gallstones-subscribe > > Web Sites for more information: > http://CureZone.com/gallstones/ > http://www.liverdoctor.com/ > http://www.sensiblehealth.com/ > http://www.cyberpog.com/health/index.htm > http://www.relfe.com/gall_stone_cleanse.html > http://www.cleansingorsurgery.com/ > > Group page: gallstones > > To change your subscription to digest send blank e-mail to: gallstones-digest > To change your subscription to NO-MAIL send blank e-mail to: gallstones-nomail > To change your subscription to NORMAL send blank e-mail to: gallstones-normal > You are receiving this email because you elected to subscribe to the Gallstones group on 's groups. By joining the list you agree to hold yourself FULLY responsible FOR yourself! > Have a nice day ! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2002 Report Share Posted April 4, 2002 In a message dated 4/4/02 10:01:34 PM Eastern Standard Time, barry91162@... writes: > This also > explains why some girl flushed 133 times over 4 1/2 years and is > still flushing out hundreds of stones every two weeks and is asking > when it will end. Just a note. It doesn't, though, explain why some people start seeing a decrease in the number of stones eliminated. That's a glitch in the theory. Not being critical - just making an observation. rachel~ " Live your dreams now. Life is not a dress rehearsal. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2002 Report Share Posted April 4, 2002 In a message dated 4/4/02 10:18:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, barry91162@... writes: > I hope this answers some questions and maybe 'groupmaster' can add > more to his own reply. > Hmmmm....and why the assumption that groupmaster is male, eh? just ribbing ya! rachel~ " Live your dreams now. Life is not a dress rehearsal. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2002 Report Share Posted April 5, 2002 , Good question. Only you can search out the answer to your own health. Your personal experience and knowledge will soon lead you to that answer for you. For me (and I can only speak for my body, experience, and limited knowledge) the soft, pea green throughout stones were coming from my liver and were formed by excellerating the elimination process by flushing. In my opinion, olive oil will not form balls on it's own but if oil is mixed with bile in the internal labratory of the body, globs can form. This internal action cannot scientifically be proven either way. This explains why I have flushed over 2,000 globs (what some people call stones) over 3 months and 8 flushes. This also explains why some girl flushed 133 times over 4 1/2 years and is still flushing out hundreds of stones every two weeks and is asking when it will end. I also believe that if someone doesn't see stones on one or two flush attempts, this does not prove that the oil will not create globs by mixing with bile internally. Some people stop flushing when they don't see results for one flush and it could have only been because the bile consistancy or some other bodily function with the flush wasn't right to produce the results. I'd say if you have soft pea green globs (stones) with no noticable center formed, it is most likly recently formed by the action of flushing. Cleaning out that stagnant bile is still a good idea but to call them stones is not exactly correct in my opinion. To each their own opinion. You need to flush a few times, gather as much information as you can find, and figure out what is best for your body. Good luck with your own personal search for health and happiness. Barry. > > > Are those dark green stones I get (I can take them apart) just > > globs of > > > stagnant bile? > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: <Rachd1961@a...> > > > <gallstones@y...> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:11 PM > > > Subject: Re: Re: stone types > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 4/2/02 11:03:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, > > > > barry91162@y... writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whatever the case, flushing will clean out toxins, gunk, sludge, > > > > > sandy 'pre-forming' stones, liver globs of stagnant bile, hard > > > > > gallstones, intestinal sludge and parasites, colon toxins and > > > > > stagnant waste from the entire digestive system. > > > > > > > > And to me, personally, that's the important thing. I'm not so > > concerned > > > > with classifications of stones as I am with how my health is > > affected by > > > the > > > > flushing. > > > > > > > > Respecting the choice of those who desire to hash this all out... > > > > > > > > rachel~ > > > > > > > > " Whether you think you can or think you can't, you're right " - > > Henry Ford > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2002 Report Share Posted April 5, 2002 Dawn, I didn't post that reply. It was written by groupmaster. You'd have to ask him about his reply. I think the theory he is trying to explain is that the liver will extract the toxins from the blood that passes through it. Then the bile will carry the toxins out to the stool for elimination from the body. If the liver is fatty or overworked, stones will form instead of smoothly passing out with bile. If the bile is lacking in an ingredient (water, cholesterol, bile salts, etc) or over loaded with an ingredient then the bile could become stagnant in the liver and more often in the gallbladder where the bile will concentrate due to the gb absorbing the water from the bile as it sits in the gb. Gallstones are formed because of this reason. Liver stones must also form because of bile problems or sluggish or overworked livers. Conditioning the bile is the best way to keep it flowing smoothly. Cleansing the liver will help the production, consistancy, and flow of bile. Dieting will improve the ingredients of the bile itself and also the full function of the liver. These actions will help to avoid the future forming of stones. If you are doing everything you know to prevent future stones forming and they still do then other factors have to be looked at as well. Things like stress, heretitary reasons, rapid weight gain or loss, excersize, etc. I hope this answers some questions and maybe 'groupmaster' can add more to his own reply. Barry. > Barry, I am intrigued by this possibility. Is this something you have > read somewhere. I think sometimes it is important to know the > possibilities so we can prevent reformation. Dawn > > > > > Or those stones that you got in the first place have been developed > to > > prevent your bowel reabsorbing strong toxins (mercury, pesticides, > lead, > > ...) that have been too high inside your body ... and your liver > may > > continue producing stones, as that is the only safe way of > preventing > > reabsorption of toxins that have been dumped with bile ... > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2002 Report Share Posted April 5, 2002 , Thanks for bringing that up. There really isn't a 'glitch' in the theory. It just has to be explained logically from the other side. In other words, the continual globs coming out would explain why the globs are formed with flushing but what about the decreasing of globs and/or the stopping of globs (stones)? I've already explained that one or two results of 'no stones' could be just a different reaction to the flush (all of us flushing has had less results and then more on the next, right?) Some people will stop at that flush and think they are stone free until pain returns a few weeks or months later. But, what about the gradual lesser results of stones? Well, there is an answer (keeping with the theory). As the body is more conditioned with better dieting, the bile consistancy, flow and production will also improve. Bile is always neccessary, as well as olive oil, to form these balls. The internal body is also always needed and testing can never be proven in any labratory. Your body is the labratory. So, if you are changing your bile, the results will definitely be better (better meaning less globs of bile-stones coming out). The body will remove bile in the normal function with stool as it should do. Flushing at that time would only increase the speed of action and also make results more viewable (more viewable mainly because of fasting while flushing). By the way, I agree that olive oil will not coagulate on it's own, or even when mixed with grapefruit, etc. That argument has been exhausted. The question that can never be proven (either way) is what happens when unhealthy bile is mixed with oil? Also when water is extracted rapidly and the intestines and colon process the whole thing. The internal action of the body can never be duplicated in a lab. Therefore, because of my personal opinion, knowledge, and experience, I believe that a lot what people call 'stones' are really globs of bile mixed with oil and processed by a flush. These are the types of stones that are pea green throughout, soft throughout, and have no evidence of center. These are the majority of 'stones' that I have eliminated from my body in the hundreds. Mind, I have also eliminated a crusty stone and small black pigment stones as well. But the majority 'stone' was the topic of discussion at the start of this thread. Also, it was great to get this 'unhealthy' bile out with the oil during a flush. You never know if those liver globs will later form into hard stones or if they really will make it out of the body on it's own. Dieting, excersize, etc. correctly will allow that bile to exit perfectly well on it's own. Hope this makes sense. Sometimes my opinion doesn't. :-) And of course, sometimes people don't agree with my opinion which is what makes my opinion mine and theirs theirs. Just a thought that is really not to be meant as a theory or a debate. My personal experience, study, and knowledge is only my own and is in no way meant to sway anyone away from theirs. Barry. > In a message dated 4/4/02 10:01:34 PM Eastern Standard Time, > barry91162@y... writes: > > > > This also > > explains why some girl flushed 133 times over 4 1/2 years and is > > still flushing out hundreds of stones every two weeks and is asking > > when it will end. > > Just a note. It doesn't, though, explain why some people start seeing a > decrease in the number of stones eliminated. That's a glitch in the > theory. Not being critical - just making an observation. > rachel~ > " Live your dreams now. Life is not a dress rehearsal. " > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2002 Report Share Posted April 5, 2002 Aren't all 'masters' male? hehe Well, in some S & M circles, masters are women. In cyberspace anything could happen. :-) > In a message dated 4/4/02 10:18:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, > barry91162@y... writes: > > > > I hope this answers some questions and maybe 'groupmaster' can add > > more to his own reply. > > > > Hmmmm....and why the assumption that groupmaster is male, eh? > > just ribbing ya! > rachel~ > " Live your dreams now. Life is not a dress rehearsal. " > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 7, 2002 Report Share Posted April 7, 2002 In a message dated 4/7/02 8:31:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, barry91162@... writes: > I thought I answered the 'lesser stones while flushing theory' but > I'll try again to support the theory one more time. > Yes, Barry. You have explained the theory - I just see it differently. I respect your right to your opinion and I value your perspective on things. We just have different thoughts on it - that's all. Thanks for taking the time, though, to re-explain your theory. Just because I see it differently doesn't mean that I'm right and you're wrong. I wouldn't begin to pretend that I know more than anyone else out here about the inner workings of the body! in health, rachel " Live your dreams now. Life is not a dress rehearsal. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 8, 2002 Report Share Posted April 8, 2002 Hi , I thought I answered the 'lesser stones while flushing theory' but I'll try again to support the theory one more time. As you continue to flush every two weeks, as you continue to change by eliminating or adding better dieting methods, as your body cleanses, as the bile production, consistancy, flow changes, so will the results. So, while you are regularly flushing, the body will change and the combination of the re-conditioning bile with the oil will change the results. Less globs, or what we call stones. Also, many factors come into play here individually. Some people flush forever and still see the same globs, or more. Does that mean the body is producing more for them? Some people see slightly less stones each time. Some people stop for a few weeks or months and resume only to find they are back to hundreds of globs again. Some people mix the potions different while experimenting with the method. Many things will change the results. Even heretitary changes, stress changes, weight changes, etc. I have personally stayed about the same in the amount of stones I am getting out per flush. My bile is around the same. The theory cannot be proven or disproven because the internal labratory of the human body cannot be tested by these results. Bile is needed to make stones or globs. Olive oil alone will not coagulate within the body. This has been proven to some degree. What hasn't, and can't be proven (even results that change cannot be used to prove this) is if healthy or unhealthy bile, if mixed with oil, in a fasting body or non fasting body, at internal body temps and intestinal processing, will in fact produce a glob form simular to a stone. The 'real' stone we know is a hard, marble object with a cholesterol or calcium base. The globs of throughout soft pea green material with no center base coming out in the hundreds and thousands in the person that is constantly flushing should not be viewed as a gallstone in my opinion. It is good to cleanse this way but the sad part of the method would be that someone doesn't understand what it is they are really eliminating from their bodies. Hence, the 133 flushes over 4 1/2 years, every two weeks, and still getting hundreds of globs out on each flush. A question mark comes up here. Either, that body is creating these thousands of globs on it's own (which if it did, the liver would have exploded years before the flushes began) or that body is in some way excellerating the normal function of the body and creating the globs with the bile-oil mix within the internal labratory of the body. No way to prove, so no proof is available. Personal experience can go either way, can change depending on too many factors to be used as evidence to support either side. It is good to cleanse for sure, but sometimes too much is enough. The body will probably work fine on it's own if you have flushed hundreds of times and getting the same number of globs out. Let the body do it's own God-given actions. Conclusion? Personal opinion and choice. Good luck. You decide. It is your body after all. :-) Barry. > In a message dated 4/4/02 10:46:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, > barry91162@y... writes: > > > > Well, there is > > an answer (keeping with the theory). As the body is more conditioned > > with better dieting, the bile consistancy, flow and production will > > also improve. Bile is always neccessary, as well as olive oil, to > > form these balls. The internal body is also always needed and testing > > can never be proven in any labratory. Your body is the labratory. So, > > if you are changing your bile, the results will definitely be better > > (better meaning less globs of bile-stones coming out). The body will > > remove bile in the normal function with stool as it should do. > > Flushing at that time would only increase the speed of action and > > also make results more viewable (more viewable mainly because of > > fasting while flushing). > > > > Well, then to further dig into this theory, let's enter a case like mine into > it. I've done fairly consistent flushing for a few months and have seen a > decrease in the amount of stones/chaff/sludge, but have not dramatically > changed my diet, i.e., still consuming fats. The only thing I've really > changed is that I've been flushing. So according to the theory, I should > still be seeing stones/globs/chaff/sludge/sand, but it has gradually > decreased. > > On another note, though, I don't think that my gb attacks were necessarily > induced by fat. I know that flies in the face of typical experiences, but > the most recent attack (I still get about one a month) happened about half an > hour after eating chicken stirfry. No high amount of fat in that. It does, > however, have the combination that Agnes has previously written about, which > is protein and grain. So that brings us to the idea that GB attacks are not > necessarily brought about just by fat, but by anything that the body has > difficulty digesting. > > So, back to the theory. I understand what you're trying to say and while I > completely respect your right to your perspective and opinion about it - I > respectfully disagree with it. I know, though, that you aren't posting it in > order to create debates, so let it be known that I'm totally okay with two > people coexisting on the same list with differing opinions. <big grin>. > > > I totally support your search for health and any conclusions you arrive at in > the process. > in health, > rachel~ > " Live your dreams now. Life is not a dress rehearsal. " > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 8, 2002 Report Share Posted April 8, 2002 Hi Rach, You know I agree with you as well. We sometimes agree to dissagree. Everyone has to make their own individual choices that will work best for them. If one of us happens to be wrong in this whole theory thing (and only one can be right) it really doesn't matter. What matters is that you do what makes you happy. Do what works for you and not what may or may not work for someone else. We are all on this road together to search for health, happiness, and maybe even a few more years out of this crazy thing called life. :-) Barry. > In a message dated 4/7/02 8:31:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, > barry91162@y... writes: > > > > I thought I answered the 'lesser stones while flushing theory' but > > I'll try again to support the theory one more time. > > > > Yes, Barry. You have explained the theory - I just see it differently. I > respect your right to your opinion and I value your perspective on things. > We just have different thoughts on it - that's all. > > Thanks for taking the time, though, to re-explain your theory. Just because > I see it differently doesn't mean that I'm right and you're wrong. I > wouldn't begin to pretend that I know more than anyone else out here about > the inner workings of the body! > > in health, > rachel > " Live your dreams now. Life is not a dress rehearsal. " > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.