Re: AMA crony Barrett

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 5/13/2002 4:54:22 PM Pacific Standard Time,

jrupprun@... writes:

Jay,

You quoted extensively from Barrett, so you might be interested

to know that he lost the suit and was reprimanded by the judge for

bringing it in the first place.

:

When you can't dispute the message, you kill the messenger. That is what the

Greeks of old did, and that's what the Bolin followers do. Barrett has some

excellent and true information regarding Hulda .

You very seriously misrepresented Barrett's law suit as being a suit brought

by the AMA with the implication that she was being sued due to her " medical "

practices. Even that isn't true. She is being sued for defamation and

libel.

The suit that Barrett (and 2 others) brought against (and others) has

not been dismissed.

No where have you presented factual information to support your statement

" ... they (i.e., AMA) are NOT interested in human health. To the contrary,

they want people to be sick. "

I'm curious about those who hate MD's and the medical profession regarding

what to do in an emergency. Do they carry special cards/bracelets that read

to the effect " In case of emergency don't take me to a hospital, instead send

me to the closest naturopath? " In the absence of that kind of message and

these kind of folks wake up in an emergency room, what will their reaction

be? I don't take their hatred of the AMA very seriously.

Jay

by the way:

http://www.toolsforhealing.com/Health/Health_News/Judges_view_of_QuackBusters.

htm

doesn't load. don't suppose that it had to be removed, do you?

[Guest guest]

,

Could you please provide proof for that statement? A weblink,

website, etc. Thank you for that info but I'd like to see the

reprimand first hand.

Where did you get the results of the case?

Barry.

> Jay,

>

> You quoted extensively from Barrett, so you might be

interested

> to know that he lost the suit and was reprimanded by the judge for

> bringing it in the first place.