Re: My theory on the liver flush….I hope all will read a...

[Guest guest]

Hi Barry:

Yes, it could explain the variation in quantity, but not the variation in

content. Content in my flushes have varied drastically in color and density

of the stones, and has also produced globs of green that looked like a small

bright green octopus, strands of green grass looking crud (only once), masses

(and I do mean masses) of wax with the color of lard, but much harder (#15),

and almost black very large stones, as well as an occasional red or white

stone. Also, I'm not a strainer with nets or colanders, or a stirrer while

in those type of containers, so I don't know if I've ever expelled hard

stones that don't float. It has been rare that the bottom of the bowl has

been visible for me and I never looked for them. I didn't even learn that I

should be looking for hard stones until about flush #15. But others on this

list have reported stones that don't float, stones that are rock hard. The

Mark theory doesn't cover variety of any sort. (By the way, don't remember

who reported those hard stones, but thank you many times over.) The

intellect does a lousy job without real application or without the ability to

test. One can come to a conclusion and then provide perfect logic for that

conclusion, and I'm convinced that is what Mark has done. It happens all the

time. For me, the output from flush to flush is just too different in make

up to basically reduce it to " the oil. " By the way, we have reports from 2

eminent labs that both the soft and hard stones are gallstones. To then say

they are not is like arguing as to whether that big round thing you play with

on the playfield is a softball or a baseball, or the thing that the NY

Yankees play with is a hardball or a baseball, they are both baseballs!

As kind of an addendum, don't you think that unless a person catches all

output in a net or colander that they can't even correctly report what they

have passed? I don't know all that I have passed. Do you?

Jay

Barry wrote:

The amounts of balls (stones) produced by liver bile will always vary

because of different bodily conditions, dieting, stress, etc at the

time of any given flush.

[Guest guest]

Jay,

I think quantity and quality can change with each flush. Both is

effected by dieting, flushing, etc,etc. The theory doesn't not

support that thought. It depends on how you read it.

Just like what you say about it being the 'oil'. Oil helps to produce

the bile action in larger amounts coming from the liver. We know the

stones (soft liver balls of bile) are not oil but we also advance the

statement to say it is not gallstones neither. Liver(stones) can not

be gallbladder(stones) also. They are two stones. Bile is in many

forms. Gallstones, liverstones, bile balls, sludge, grain, etc.

The flush method will eliminate all and the results are different

because of it. Mark's theory suggests that the flush method forms

balls from the bile that is expelled by the method itself weither you

have gallstones or not. Thus the thousands of bile balls resulting.

You may be getting everything out with those bile globs as well. Some

do, some don't.

Anyway, your many varity of stones or types of bile is definitely

something to study. How much are from the liver, gallbladder,

intestine, colon. Whatever the case, I hope you are reaching the

results you are looking for weither it's to stop colic pain, loose

weight, live healthier, clean the liver, stop allergies, etc. We all

come into this method looking for different things. Good luck with

your search for your own health and happiness. Works for some but not

everyone's problem.

Barry.

>

> The amounts of balls (stones) produced by liver bile will always

vary

> because of different bodily conditions, dieting, stress, etc at the

> time of any given flush.

>

>

>