Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 " My theory on the liver flush….I hope all will read and comment. " What it sounds like to me, is a person who has done one flush and now has all of the answers. It also sounds as if Mark made his conclusion and then went through untestable, extensive, and highly subjective " logic " to support that conclusion. In reading his logic I can then assume that each and every flush will produce the same results, except when no results are produced (for which he has an answer also). In 16 flushes it has been rare for any of the output to be the same or even similar. Some produced next to nothing, then what followed that was 6# of wax! Where did that come from? Then the last one, produced much darker and much larger stones. Stones are not the same size from flush to flush, nor a the colors the same either. I agree with another person's comment that the gallbladder and tubing is highly elastic and can stretch to expel things much larger than its normal size. Also, in most of mine I have felt the release or flow of whatever is moving out, right under my breast bone. It's as if a faucet has just been turned on. Sometimes it's uncomfortable, sometimes not. By Mark's logic, the same input should produce the same output, and that just isn't the case. Jay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 I kinda feel like I started controversy some weeks back when I asked a question about whether studies had been done to determine whether or not there was a bit of parasite or bacteria in the middle of each stone...all kinds of varying ideas have been posted since. I guess it's good as long as it stays friendly...I like hearing different ideas and opinions >> " My theory on the liver flush….I hope all will read and comment. " >What it sounds like to me, is a person who has done one flush I agree here also. I have done the flush many times with good and lasting results in the past...was never told to do it more than once or twice a year back then (10 years ago). This last time I waited 5 years before doing the flush, and though I felt good after doing it from the oils, cleaning out the colon and intestines with the epsoms, and getting bile moving with apple juice/beet juice, it has stirred things up and know I need to do it again...and will do so until it becomes apparent that it may no longer be a solution for me. I am all for doing this cleanse, and believe, no matter what, that it is doing good things for the body. L. Meydrech eBay ID: claudias_corner_auctions Visit my current auctions: http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/claudias_corner_auctions/ http://nutritionist.tripod.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2002 Report Share Posted May 16, 2002 Jay, If I can, I'll just mention a few things about 'Marks Theory'. Since Agnes sent this post over from her curezone forum it is unlikely he will read your reply and comment because the group and the curezone forum are not linked together. You can reply to Mark at curezone but he isn't a member of this group. I've done 8 flushes and eliminated over 2,000 of those soft bile balls. I believe his theory to be correct as far as the difference of bile balls and hard gallstones. It took me a lot longer to reach the same conclusions that he has. Maybe he's smarter than me? Or wrong? Whatever the case, there is a reason to his logic about the amount produced by the flush. The amounts of balls (stones) produced by liver bile will always vary because of different bodily conditions, dieting, stress, etc at the time of any given flush. As you improve dieting, continue to flush, etc your body will change and the results will too. He doesn't mean that if you drink an exact amount of oil that the liver will always produce the exact amount of bile and balls. You have to look at it in a more open minded way to understand that the body is making the bile balls and not the amount of oil, etc. I hope this helps to understand the theory. If it doesn't, well, good luck with your theory as well. :-) Be happy and healthy. Barry. > " My theory on the liver flush….I hope all will read and comment. " > > What it sounds like to me, is a person who has done one flush and now has all > of the answers. It also sounds as if Mark made his conclusion and then went > through untestable, extensive, and highly subjective " logic " to support that > conclusion. > > In reading his logic I can then assume that each and every flush will produce > the same results, except when no results are produced (for which he has an > answer also). In 16 flushes it has been rare for any of the output to be the > same or even similar. Some produced next to nothing, then what followed that > was 6# of wax! Where did that come from? Then the last one, produced much > darker and much larger stones. Stones are not the same size from flush to > flush, nor a the colors the same either. I agree with another person's > comment that the gallbladder and tubing is highly elastic and can stretch to > expel things much larger than its normal size. Also, in most of mine I have > felt the release or flow of whatever is moving out, right under my breast > bone. It's as if a faucet has just been turned on. Sometimes it's > uncomfortable, sometimes not. > > By Mark's logic, the same input should produce the same output, and that just > isn't the case. > > Jay > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.