Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 Hi : I did answer your question. You didn't read the answer. It is absolutly repetition of old stuff, but neither or any of her supporters provide anything to the contrary. , when are YOU going to provide evidence that f. buski lives outside the red area of that little map? When are YOU going to provide evidence that f. buski is found in ANY cancer in ANY area of the world, including the red map area? One liners don't provide evidence, they simply display the unyielding lack of evidence of the writer. , where did you get the notion that the AMA says that all heart disease is hereditary? I haven't heard that. The medical profession in general is saying that high fat diets along with a sedentary life style is the cause of heart disease, and that hereditary factors play a role. , your logic about birds only in Alaska is a pittiful excuse for trying to get f. buski out of SE Asia. It is another avoidance of the real issue, something that all supporters are experts at. Neither I, nor anyone else have said that intestinal flukes are regionalized to SE Asia, only that the one that dreams about in regard to cancer is. , present a f. buski outside of the red map area, and/or one associated with cancer, and don't dodge that one. Your little one-liners and warped logic can't produce one. Jay Jay with another astounding disclosure! But, Jay, this is only repetition of old stuff. Like the AMA saying all heart disease is hereditary. Did you think it would surprise me they'd say flukes only exist in China? Next you'd be telling us birds only live in Alaska, or polar bears in Afganistan. And I noticed you didn't answer my question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.