Guest guest Posted July 25, 2009 Report Share Posted July 25, 2009 Hello batman, I wasn't saying that. I was saying that oxygen does not necessarily detroy a virus. But, since you mention it, I suspect that hyberbaric oxygen is NOT effective as a cancer treatment (though I don't know this to be true). Cancer cells can get along just fine in a variety of oxygen conditions. The fact that cancer cells have switched disproportionately toward glycolysis does not mean that oxygen is lethal to them, it simply means that they need less of it. Mike Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 5:06:50 PM, you wrote: b> hi mike b> are you saying hyperbaric oxyen isnt good for cancer treatment? b> regards b> bobby b> b> From: Mike Golden b> Bret Peirce b> Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 11:16 PM b> Subject: Re[2]: [ ] Green tea absorbs better with acid added b> Hello Bret, b> A virus is not an anaerobe. A virus does not have an energy production b> capacity. It uses receptor sites to enter cells. It then uses the b> cell's energy production mechanisms for replication. It has no b> capacity for respiration, anaerobically or aerobically. It is basically b> a piece of information and is not alive. Oxygen is not particularly b> toxic to virus. In fact, hyperbaric oxygen is used to stimulate the b> production of polio virus and coxsackie virus. A lot of the b> information floating around the internet concerning virus, cancer b> cells and oxygen is incorrect. b> -- Best regards, Mike mailto:goldenmike@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.