Fwd: Re: A Radical Proposal

[Guest guest]

I thought it might be constructive to show that Adrienne has made a

similar plea in the past .

It might be noted, in this context, that about half of my postings lately

have never been circulated. If they had, what I had to say might have

been clearer to all.

Back on March 3, 2002, Adrienne wrote the following.

============Start of Quoted Material============

>Arguing and/or name calling will not be tolerated, and I hope this will

>be the end of what had been occurring. This kind of written forum,

>IMO, can sometimes unnecessarily lead to misunderstandings, etc.

>because we don't have the benefit of personally knowing each other, and

>we all come from different walks of life and different educational

>backgrounds. Therefore, we all should give each other the benefit of the

>doubt, and not read into posts, ideas and/or meanings that may not be

>there. I certainly hope that you have not found any of my posts to be

>offensive, as I have not taken any of yours to be such, although I must

>confess that my posts were meant to be challenging in a positive way.

----------Thus far, the Quoted Material----------

As I said before, the names that I have been called here and the

defamatory innuendoes are not acceptable in any cultured society. And

this because I also challenged certain statements in order to clarify

what appeared to be lack of clarity.

Thank you, Adrienne, for pointing this out officially.

---------------------------

IRA L. JACOBSON

---------------------------

mailto:laser@...