Guest guest Posted July 30, 2009 Report Share Posted July 30, 2009 hi brett i would appreciate his email address,thank you regards bobby From: Bret Peirce One thing is for certain,....the email I just got from Stage IV lung cancer patient loves cesium chloride and her husband is willing to talk to anybody who has something to say about cesium. He has asked me to post his email address for anyone wanting to ask about his protocol and his wife. She was only coughing up blood three months ago,...today she is off pain meds, back to work, instead of lying in a coffin with plastic flowers over her corpse. Miracle? Not really! I just listen to Nobel Prize Winners and so did they! She did cesium, dmso, chlorophyll, juicing, and omega III. I still don't believe it either,...but man what a success story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Thank you Mike: This will be the last posting I make in this thread,...don't want to belabor technicalities,...if a therapy works, that is what is important. Although I disagree with a couple of technicalities, I will say this,... I have watched people die on budwig, vitamin c infusions, Gersons, cesium chloride, dmso, and such,...I have also seen people respond to similar therapies as well, right now cesium and dmso together are providing me with immediate results in most case, especially pain. A little bit of cesium chloride will not affect cancers and may even help cancer grow faster,...too low of dose of cesium has been proven to keep cancer in it's preferred ph range. So, by taking sub therapeutic doses of cesium you do not change the internal environment enough to cause cancer atopsis. This would not indicate that cesium helps cancer grow faster, sub therapeutic doses are ineffective. This was addressed years ago. Brewer's paper scientifically tested all Warburg's theories with spectronomy, flouresncent assays so these theories were infact substantiated scientifically, and once something is substantiated, timing is of little consequence, and I know you know this, Warburg was also substantiated with clinical outcomes and back up testing. Pretty firm results and the data is hard to refute,...and nobody does refute them scientifically. Instead they sound just like you! So, when an article is written, it is not very good reason to invalidate it's contents using time or when it was written. This would mean the Oppenheimers theories were no good. Einstein's theories are old now as well, so are Isaac Newton's...nobody argues this point with their research as the argument of age is devoid of factual back-up. Nobody goes here. The argument that Brewer's paper went nowhere is not a testiment to anything. Much of his findings are echoed today in many different research articles. Even AMA and Pharma sponsored ones. Many papers published today carry forward and apply those very facts that Warburg and Brewer have validated for us already. The relationship between ph and oxygen have been repeatedly echoed in subsequent research. Even the latest PPI study borrows these facts. Many, studies today, even one's published by pharma sponsored studies all indicate that cancers are grown in ischemic environments and acidic environments in vitro. Why? There really should not be any controversy. Koch's papers went nowhere too, many other alternative research studies don't even get published here in the united states and every single alternative practitioner has been censured, harrassed, injunctioned, and attacked with no scientific findings, just inuendo and banter. Does this invalidate their work? Not hardly! .. Their papers have gone nowhere too. This means nothing. German medicine is based upon Koch's research, they didn't care he wrote his articles back before WWII even started! Validity and facts remain such, as facts, and transcend time. Also, You are incorrect about several pump mechanisms as well Sodium is pumped out of cell not into cell. If it were pumped into cells they would lyse. Proton pump is usually applied to orgnanelles, moving H+ from cytomplams to inner membranes. It is ATP active process. True, H+ pump has also been found to exist at the extermal cell membrane and this pumps H+ externally. Lactic acid inside cancer cells usually break down into lactate, (which is burned,) and H+. This H+ is then theorized pumped out through the exchange with potassium via the Na+/K+ ATPase mechanism. It is also established as the primary mechanism for exchanging K+ for H+ and does have regulatory effect upon cancer homeostasis, and is why PPI have shown to cause atopsis in cancer cells by inhibbitting the influx of K+ (a carrier of glucose,) and retention of H+. Cancer cells have narrow ph parameters in both directions, you can try to lower the ph past their tolerances or you can try to raise their ph past their tolerances. I prefer the high ph method, others may want to try low ph method. It depends upon their cancers. Any mechanism that interferes with these pumps will actually have anti cancer effects. Glycosides, PPI's, and the rest all demostrate activity in cell lines. Also the Na+/K+ ATPase mediated pump does not dump lactate. Lactate isn't even an acid. It isn't pumped,... H+ is however. So, it is fact....Cancers have narrow ph parameters and targetting this narrow range can be therapeutic in either direction. This does not invalidate one another's position it supports both positions. Either seek to go lower or higher than it can tolerate. One thing is for certain,....the email I just got from Stage IV lung cancer patient loves cesium chloride and her husband is willing to talk to anybody who has something to say about cesium. He has asked me to post his email address for anyone wanting to ask about his protocol and his wife. She was only coughing up blood three months ago,...today she is off pain meds, back to work, instead of lying in a coffin with plastic flowers over her corpse. Miracle? Not really! I just listen to Nobel Prize Winners and so did they! She did cesium, dmso, chlorophyll, juicing, and omega III. I still don't believe it either,...but man what a success story. Sincerely Bret ps. Chase also has emailed me a clincal testing on his wife, waived hisk/her rights to privacy and want me to shove these clinical studies in people's face who think they have done nothing special with terminal lung cancer. I wish more people would take this stance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 I am new to this site, but am intreguied by what you write. I was diagnosed with stage 3 non-hodgkins follicular lymphoma about a month ago and am totally confused about which way to go. All I know for sure is that I do not want chemo. Can you tell me if you are under a doctor's care for your DMSO/Cesium treatment? I have not been able to find a doctor who wants to do anything except chemo and would like to know how you handled this. Right now, all I am doing is Budwig and Essaic tea. Any insights you can offer would be appreciated. Vicki ....right now cesium and dmso together are providing me with immediate results in most case, especially pain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Love ESSIAC and Budwig. Hope that the ESSIAC comes from original distributer in Canada. Loaded with various polysacharides, (immune system,) oxygen donors and anti oxidants, ie, mineral oxides, chlorophyll, flavenoids, polyphenols, quinones, and dozens of alkaline minerals. The disputes over mechanism can be a distraction and I have already committed not to go on with debate -like discussions for this reason. You don't need to come here a get confused. The important fact is, " Does the therapy work or doesn't it. " period. When researching clinical trials we see high efficacy in certain treatments. Ozone, cesium, IV ascorbates, dmso have case history or actual trials. The very first cesium trial had 100% response rate,...so whether or not you buy into an invitro study here, or animal study there,....the bottom line is that out of 30 patients in the first cesium trial, all 30 patients revearsed their cancers. NOw we can find a cell line study done in petri dish that states sub therapeutic doses of cesium actually spead up cancer,...nonetheless, how does that minimize 100% of anything? Also, NHL,...has a very strong viral association. Just type " non hodgkins lymphoma and viruses, " into your browser. Clear a convincing studies linking this disease to viruses. This disease is known to go into remission by itself sometimes,...sounds just like chronic viral infection just by description. So, protocols that are anti viral, may be benefit to you. I will send you protocol used by orthomolecular doctor out of Santa Fe. Good luck Bret ....right now cesium and dmso together are providing me with immediate results in most case, especially pain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 2009 Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 Who is the original Canada distributor of Essaic? Vicki Love ESSIAC and Budwig. Hope that the ESSIAC comes from original distributer in Canada. Loaded with various polysacharides, (immune system,) oxygen donors and anti oxidants, ie, mineral oxides, chlorophyll, flavenoids, polyphenols, quinones, and dozens of alkaline minerals. The disputes over mechanism can be a distraction and I have already committed not to go on with debate -like discussions for this reason. You don't need to come here a get confused. The important fact is, " Does the therapy work or doesn't it. " period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2009 Report Share Posted August 5, 2009 Ill get you that contact out of Toronto! Easy to google but I want to make sure it's not an imposter. stay tuned, Love ESSIAC and Budwig. Hope that the ESSIAC comes from original distributer in Canada. Loaded with various polysacharides, (immune system,) oxygen donors and anti oxidants, ie, mineral oxides, chlorophyll, flavenoids, polyphenols, quinones, and dozens of alkaline minerals. The disputes over mechanism can be a distraction and I have already committed not to go on with debate -like discussions for this reason. You don't need to come here a get confused. The important fact is, " Does the therapy work or doesn't it. " period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.