Re: Helpful Ideas/Reflections Requested, Thanks!

[Guest guest]

Carol,

If you had major surgery for uterine cancer three years ago without

having had a thoracic CT, then your surgeons probably believed the

lesions were confined to your abdomen. It is not considered stage 4

unless it has invaded bowel, abdomen, paraaortic, or inguinal lymph

nodes or there is distant metastasis such as to the lungs. Was there

any evidence of residual cancer before opting for IPT? What did the

original biopsy or the surgical pathology report as to the type of

cancer -- was it carcinoma or sarcoma? This would make a big

difference with most treatment choices, and chemotherapy or IPT would

be unlikely to significantly affect any remaining tumor. Most people

who use IPT for advanced cancers are severely disappointed. Dr.

Donato -, whose grandfather invented IPT, told me that

only 25% of stage 3 cancers significantly benefit from IPT and

ultimately 0% of stage 4 patients do.

I am not a believer in intuition. This seems mostly used to

determine the sincerity of the person who is advising you. I know my

own intuition must not be worth crap as I find most actors on TV or

the movies to be very believable. This can be quite humbling.

On the other hand, my own intuition tells me that there is not a

single IPT purveyor who factors in the mechanism by which chemically

induced necrosis in tumors can trigger the induction of

epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and concomitant release of

vimentin. This adds an additional headache in trying to deal with

quiescent stem cells, and with the multiple drug resistance (MDR) and

the decreased cell-mediated immune responsiveness caused by the

chemotherapy or IPT. EMT turns a page that you really, really do not

want turned.

Most alternative strategies do offer hope to stage 4 cancer patients,

and even if the therapies are weak or problematic the hope itself has

benefit. The absence of hope is an independent scythe.

High-dose vitamin C has the advantage of almost always being safe to

use, but it has one of the same disadvantages as chemotherapy in that

it will only kill those cells it can kill and allow unscathed cells

free rein to grow. It is not at all uncommon to feel great when

cancer is growing very slowly. This almost feels like treachery.

Cancer itself is treachery, but there is no greater treachery than

our plutocratic government allowing corporate dumping of toxic

chemicals into every aspect of our environment and then telling us

(mostly a population of ditzy, mind-controlled servitors) that all is well.

Rather then limit yourself to finding more fad therapies to add to

your protocol it might be time to revisit your whole program and

question all of your assumptions. As the cancer seems to be growing

slowly you can afford to take pains and analyze your situation in

depth. This is a lot more work than relying on the uncalibrated

intuition but the effort is never regretted.

At 07:33 AM 7/18/2010, you wrote:

>

>Hello,

>I have been cancer free from uterine stage 4 for 3 years. I had a

>major operation March 30, 3 years ago,followed by only 9 IPT's and

>it was wiped out. However, no one ever CT'd my lungs at that time.

>

>However, in the last half a year some small mm nodules have appeared

>peripherally in the top portion of my ab CT, so they Ct'd the whole

>lungs areas and found several small nodules (mm in size).

>

>They are too small to biopsy, and besides all this I am feeling just Great!

>

>I seem to be living a " model " life with great diet, supplements and

>all, but something needs to be attacked here.

>

>I tried more IPT, but that only kept them at bay and didn't seem to

>work. Did other tests to see if it was fungal, but so far haven't

>discovered what it is exactly.

>

>And the mystery is that I feel fine and great!

>

>It is unclear whether these spots are related to a metastasis or

>some other situation.

>

>I have done 4 1/2 months of high dose Vit. C weekly, which, if it

>were cancer related, I would have imagined would have had an effect.

>

>I just tested and found all the spots have grown about 2 mm so it is

>slow growing, but I need a new plan.

>

>I am considering alkaline/ionized water, ozonated water, possible UV

>bloodwork to add on to my existing program. I have also upped my

>exercise program to walking/mild intermittent jogging/tai chi breaks

>in the early am before breakfast.

>

>I also recently bought the amethyst biomat (far infrared) which,if

>anyone is intersted, by the way, I can tell you the best place I

>have found to get it...but right now I want to focus on my story.

>

>I am usually a bit shy to " expose " myself like this online to a

>group, but there seems to be some very interesting people here, so

>if anyone can gently tell me any constructive ideas, I am open to hearing them.

>

>I am trusting that my intuition will pick up any of the right answers.

>

>Thank you in advance for any and all quality help/suggestions.

>

>(By the way, all the people who know me simply cannot believe this

>new situation....I appear to be very healthy and doing all the right

>things, but I guess there is now more to learn, and then for me to

>implement and keep sharing back with others in need, passing the

>torch onwards, as I always like to do).

>

>In gratitude,

>Carol

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

Thanks for taking the time to write. First, it was stage 4 because it was

outside the uterine area. It was a massive operation, and they also took off the

flap over the stomach (can't remember the name right now)....5 hour operation,

13 days in the hospital.

The IPT was for killing the microscopic amount of cancer still left like a

carpet everywhere. It worked.

I think I have much more confidence in IPT than you do, and also from my

experience with the doctor you are mentioning, he often changes his story from

moment to moment. I have personal contact with some of the other longtime IPT

doctors that I resonate with and who give me much more help. I have also seen

IPT help many people as when they choose chemo but this safe way of getting it.

I don't want to argue about IPT...I used it when I thought it was necessary and

have seen it help many people. Of course I hate traditional approaches and

traditional chemo to me is horrific. But sometimes one has to keep an open mind

and when choosing to use chemo, IPT is the safest way to go from my experience.

It was my compromise at the time. And it seemed to work. All my other areas

remain cancer free 3 years later. Also my CA 125 is great.

Right now I am looking for alternatives and ideas because it is not clear if

this is metastasis or something else and so far the approaches I have tried are

not working.

In this very moment I am open of course to other things. If you have any

suggestions, that is great.

Have you worked with uterine cancer mets to the lung? How have you handled it?

That would be very helpful.

When I say " intuition " it means that I have to hear details about different

ideas, and I trust it will " hit " me as right in my gut. It will draw me in....I

am an energyworker, so this is my guide. I do not go only by that. Using

medicine and science combined is what I am learned to integrate.

Thanks for any suggestions.

Do you think UV bloodwork is valuable? Alkaline/ionized water? Ozonated water?

Any other ideas?

If you feel to share any thoughts that come to you, I thank you in advance.

Sometimes it takes a lot of words for people to communicate...especially by

emails, as by voice you can sometimes catch the meaning of people more deeply.

For example, I do not just blindly go by " intuition " , but I have seen in myself

and other cancer patients that the right approaches will also resonate in a pull

that they cannot deny. That is only my experience. Some people are visual,

scientific only, etc.

Thanks again.

Carol

PS...Saying that they didn't CT the lungs because they didn't think there was

involvement there, is a good thought. Thank you.

[Guest guest]

PS So much to write! I forgot to answer your question: carcinoma Thanks.

[Guest guest]

> I am not a believer in intuition. This seems mostly used to

> determine the sincerity of the person who is advising you. I know my > own

intuition must not be worth crap as I find most actors on TV or the movies to be

very believable. This can be quite humbling.

, this statement will forever be etched in my mind as a Classic

Comment.

I did want to comment on using your intuition. Sure, it's not scientific, but I

believe in using it, too. For instance, I have a strong intuitive feeling that

I should stay far away from Tamoxifen and chemo. This knowledge has nothing to

do with facts and numbers, but a deep feeling inside.

Ever since I was a child, I would never, ever eat fish or shellfish. As an

adult, I discovered that I am actually severely allergic to both. My

'intuition' protected me, I believe. My intuition also led me to a vegetarian

raw food lifestyle, etc.

Anyway, I have found that if something is what my body will need, the item will

sound pleasing to my ear. Weird, eh? It will sound inviting and will jump out

at me.

Craziness.

ar

[Guest guest]

Thank you, Ar!!!

Actually, I have also studied with a " medical intuitive " woman for 3 1/2 years.

She used to work for an allergy testing doctor and would " guess " correctly the

results of the tests done on the patients before the results came back. They

used to play this game a lot and finally she has branched out on her own.

She can " read " food allergies and imbalances in people...over the phone and in

person. She also teaches people how to " tune in " to what their inner wisdom of

the body is trying to tell and guide us to. She has been an Invaluable Coach to

me in many ways.

When I was first diagnosed 3 years ago, many many approaches were presented to

me. Usually I have a hard time deciding things, but suddenly my intuition was in

high gear. I " knew " which approaches didn't feel right and which I were

attracting me, and I think I chose wisely.

Now I have to re-evaluate this new " glitch " and so I am inviting the same kind

of help and trust I will " sense " and attune to what is right....but I also have

to keep open to scientific testings and information and ways to keep me in

balance.

So combining the scientific, medical and the intuitive, for those of us who feel

to, can be very very useful.

Thanks for your Lovely Post!!!

I appreciate your energy and caring thoughts.

Carol

> > I am not a believer in intuition. This seems mostly used to

> > determine the sincerity of the person who is advising you. I know my own

intuition must not be worth crap as I find most actors on TV or the movies to be

very believable. This can be quite humbling.

>

, this statement will forever be etched in my mind as a Classic

Comment.

I did want to comment on using your intuition. Sure, it's not scientific, but I

believe in using it, too. For instance, I have a strong intuitive feeling that

I should stay far away from Tamoxifen and chemo. This knowledge has nothing to

do with facts and numbers, but a deep feeling inside.

Ever since I was a child, I would never, ever eat fish or shellfish. As an

adult, I discovered that I am actually severely allergic to both. My

'intuition' protected me, I believe. My intuition also led me to a vegetarian

raw food lifestyle, etc.

Anyway, I have found that if something is what my body will need, the item will

sound pleasing to my ear. Weird, eh? It will sound inviting and will jump out

at me.

Craziness.

ar

[Guest guest]

Hi Carol,

I think your intuition has done a pretty good job for you so far. Just keep

trusting in it and understanding that the body changes and so does its needs.

I've found I'm an okay medical intuitive with animals.

I would like to know more about this woman who has coached you over the phone.

You can respond through private email.

I've not done well with Reiki, by the way. For whatever reason, it totally

turns me off.

Talk to you later.

ar

[Guest guest]

Hi Ar,

Thanks for your note.

One of the most challenging things for me is, indeed, to learn how the body may

be changing and how to change things accordingly. I just love to stay on a

routine that has worked before, and it is challenging to explore new things.

I am regrouping quickly, as my nature is very optimistic and enthusiastic. I am

hoping that I am finding new ways/things to implement that are going to be

enjoyable and helpful.

And then in return, to keep sharing these improvements with others to help them

as well.

About the Reiki, you see right here how intuition plays such a great role. It

has been a great love of mine for 20 years! And I totally respect and honor that

it is not the path for everyone to feel that way! Although on an aside note, I

was very lucky to learn it in the original tradition, and have my own background

in growth and meditation, so when I do it/share it, people often " feel " atuned

to it in a way they never had before. Many people are doing shortened/abreviated

forms of it. That could be the reason many are not " feeling " it. However, from

my many years of experience with it, I also do know for sure that it definitely

may not be for everyone, and it is a joy actually to respect others and know

that each person has their own path to follow!! So I can sort of intuit whether

to say more or share more with people according to their interest or not.

I will write you more personally, and thank you for your support.

Carol

>

> Hi Carol,

>

> I think your intuition has done a pretty good job for you so far. Just keep

trusting in it and understanding that the body changes and so does its needs.

>

> I've found I'm an okay medical intuitive with animals.

>

> I would like to know more about this woman who has coached you over the phone.

You can respond through private email.

>

> I've not done well with Reiki, by the way. For whatever reason, it totally

turns me off.

>

> Talk to you later.

>

> ar

>

[Guest guest]

At 11:04 AM 7/18/2010, Carol asks:

>Do you think UV bloodwork is valuable?

It is probably useful in some situations. I have never seen any real

studies that would indicate those situations for which it has value

and those where it would fall on its face.

>Alkaline/ionized water?

Mostly nonsense. This is normally made from tap water. When the

chlorides and carbonates are removed it does have a few residual

cations that will bring up the pH, but the absolute number is still

very low and too low to have a significant physiological

effect. Sometimes the oxidation reduction potential (ORP) can be

driven down very low using a related method and I have seen

occasional benefit but too many failures. I can't predict when it

will be useful. The method requires forceful pumping of various

brines through the system, very expensive custom-manufactured

platinum plates, and a back flushing routine with HCl.

>Ozonated water?

I can't imagine this doing anything beyond making you belch

oxygen. It is too much of a stretch to think it could survive the

warm acidic environment of your stomach, then make its way through

the screening function of stomach lining which has not evolved to

transmit gasses, especially reactive gasses. If one percent made it

though, and then, if one percent of your lungs are tumorous, then

only one part in 10,000 would reach a tumor. From there it would

have to pass through the acidic milieu of the tumor and drift

upstream against tumorous tissue's pressure gradient and make it

through the cancer's lipid membrane.

Of course ozone machine marketers will trot out the dated writings of

Warburg imputing that he would have loved ozone. They will tell you

how ozone therapy is accepted in other parts of the world, curse the

US pharmaceutical manufactures for their participation in a global

conspiracy, and then tell you how each ozone molecule is like a

little woodpecker puncturing holes into cancer cells.

>Any other ideas?

Only ideas that could pass rational scrutiny even if not fully

tested. I am sure that there are beneficial remedies that may seem

fanciful to me at this time, but life is too short and too precious

to gamble on treatment confirmation by pendulum, muscle testing,

intuition, or other wishful or metaphysical methods.

[Guest guest]

Hello ,

It was good of you to take the time to reply. I hear how you view things. I

think we may mostly be on very different paths/viewpoints of healing.

My experience with live blood cell microscopy people is that if you change the

" terrain " you change the blood and the results in the body. The expert I have

had contact with actually has measured blood changes from either ozonated water

as well as alkaline/ionized/oxygenated water.

I understand you do not view this as valuable, but I cannot discount these ideas

as you are. Thanks, however, for sharing your view.

I would value any constructive ideas that come to you other than the ones I have

mentioned which you have discounted. Do you have any Positive, Constructive

ideas to add? That would be of value.

Knocking the pharmaceutical companies and standard treatments, which we all

already are in agreement on, is not helpful for me.

Equally, knocking other methods that have been proven helpful by Alternative

therapists I have been in contact with (besides the live blood cell, others as

well), is not helpful.

If it is not your experience, that is a valuable thing to hear.

With your vast expertise, I would be interested in any other constructive

suggestions that come to mind that I might look into.

I might add as well, that when one is facing these decisions it can be a very

sensitive time. That is why I was requesting responses, but in a bit of a gentle

way so as to feel welcome and comfortable asking and discussing.

Thanks.

Carol

>

> At 11:04 AM 7/18/2010, Carol asks:

>

> >Do you think UV bloodwork is valuable?

>

> It is probably useful in some situations. I have never seen any real

> studies that would indicate those situations for which it has value

> and those where it would fall on its face.

>

> >Alkaline/ionized water?

>

> Mostly nonsense. This is normally made from tap water. When the

> chlorides and carbonates are removed it does have a few residual

> cations that will bring up the pH, but the absolute number is still

> very low and too low to have a significant physiological

> effect. Sometimes the oxidation reduction potential (ORP) can be

> driven down very low using a related method and I have seen

> occasional benefit but too many failures. I can't predict when it

> will be useful. The method requires forceful pumping of various

> brines through the system, very expensive custom-manufactured

> platinum plates, and a back flushing routine with HCl.

>

> >Ozonated water?

>

> I can't imagine this doing anything beyond making you belch

> oxygen. It is too much of a stretch to think it could survive the

> warm acidic environment of your stomach, then make its way through

> the screening function of stomach lining which has not evolved to

> transmit gasses, especially reactive gasses. If one percent made it

> though, and then, if one percent of your lungs are tumorous, then

> only one part in 10,000 would reach a tumor. From there it would

> have to pass through the acidic milieu of the tumor and drift

> upstream against tumorous tissue's pressure gradient and make it

> through the cancer's lipid membrane.

>

> Of course ozone machine marketers will trot out the dated writings of

> Warburg imputing that he would have loved ozone. They will tell you

> how ozone therapy is accepted in other parts of the world, curse the

> US pharmaceutical manufactures for their participation in a global

> conspiracy, and then tell you how each ozone molecule is like a

> little woodpecker puncturing holes into cancer cells.

>

>

> >Any other ideas?

>

> Only ideas that could pass rational scrutiny even if not fully

> tested. I am sure that there are beneficial remedies that may seem

> fanciful to me at this time, but life is too short and too precious

> to gamble on treatment confirmation by pendulum, muscle testing,

> intuition, or other wishful or metaphysical methods.

>

>

>