Guest guest Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 Hi, Sharon. I certainly did not miss that point, and I certainly agree with you. However, some of the things you mention in your post trouble me because they do sound like hocus-pocus---things such as " energy imbalance, " bio-energy of the cells, " " living next to a radio station " and " parasites. " That is my own personal feeling about those particular things you mentioned. Other things you mentioned I myself believe and follow. I don't deny those things I have questioned; I just am very unsure about them and they sound strange to me, personally. What I would LOVE to see would be for mainstream science and mainstream medicine to stop treating " alternative " medicine like it's just a lot of garbage and clap-trap, worth only the time it takes to ridicule and discredit it. What I would LOVE to see would be for mainstream science and medicine to make a REAL EFFORT, through REAL, SOLID STUDIES, to PROVE or DISPROVE the validity of as many alternative treatments as possible. Mainstream medicine and mainstream research simply does NOT have anything near the kind of track record with its own efforts at eradicating cancer that it can afford to take such a " holier than thou " attitude. And if mainstream medicine really wants to convince those who desire to follow alternative methods that those methods don't work, then they ought to devote some REAL effort, and not just words, to finding out if they work or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2010 Report Share Posted June 2, 2010 This is something of an artificial polarization as there are increasing numbers of clinicians who minimize the amount of conventional therapies they recommend and maximize those that seem natural to them. Surgery is sometimes mandatory no matter your philosophy, for example, a mechanical treatment for a mechanical problem -- such as an intestinal, airway, or vascular obstruction. That said, if I were forced to choose between the chemo-radiation route and " anything and everything else " (natural, off-label, unsupervised experimental, etc.) I would choose the " all else " category as long as I had access to the best of these options. There are those who are in a panic because of lack health insurance they have no access to the " necessary " chemo and radiation. This can actually be their good fortune if they are open to casting a wider net, but so many are willing to die rather than stray from the sacerdotal medical autocrats and the sacraments of chemo and radiation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.