Guest guest Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 Fasting has clinical testing. I was surprised by the positive results. I would recommend using fasting in early stage III or less. Hard to recommend stage IV cancers fast. Simple Idea, your body burns fat when starving, creates ketones and triglycerides. Now your body cells can still work at adequate efficiency, for awhile, while cancer cannot. Cancers don't know what to do with ketones and triglycerides,. (most cancers.) Go to this site and learn more about fasting. Herbert was so knowledgeable about the body it was frightening. His books are masterworks. Joe http://chestofbooks .com/health/ natural-cure/ The-Hygienic- System-Fasting- and-Sun-Bathing/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 I'm not a 'Master' on Fasting albeit having completed an extended fast back in the mid 50s..........extended being 27 days while at Herbert Shelton's Hygienic Ranch and then two more upon getting home. Fasting=water fasting, everything else is just a reduced intake of food and possibly strictly juices. I water fasted. The Naturopath, clearly one that conducted thousands of fast, Herbert M. Shelton, and the author of numerous books recommended against fasting in cancer. Understand thinking may have changed in the last 50 years, however, he did not find it effective but wondered whether or not it might be beneficial after surgery. ?? Shelton was also a teacher of Food Combining and I believe there is some efficacy in that approach and am completely persuaded that fasting, for most conditions, can be very beneficial and I base that upon personal observation and the reading material that seems to make sense. Seeing results and speaking with people helped at The Ranch was sufficient evidence for me. I never did meet anyone that benefited from real fasting. To be sure, there is more to this than giving up food. Shelton did not even want me writing letters which I did all day. He limited sun bathing to 10 minutes daily and rest, rest, rest. Apparently he got very sick in his early 70s and lived until 90. The Authorities were often 'after him' and that would cause enough stress to eventually make one ill. Joe C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 Bret: I used fasting quite extensive back in 1994 when I was diagnosed with terminal Stage IV breast cancer. I used colonics as well. Go to this site and learn more about fasting. Herbert was so knowledgeable about the body it was frightening. His books are masterworks. Joe http://chestofbooks .com/health/ natural-cure/ The-Hygienic- System-Fasting- and-Sun-Bathing/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2009 Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 The problem with fasting in cancer is that the cancer will continue to dump lactate into the blood. This will be be converted into glucose by the liver and much of that will feed the cancer cells, and the cycle will continue. Along with this the cancer will scavenge glutamine. This seems like it could go either way. You might slow cancer growth down a bit, but will accelerate cachexia. You run into two other problems with fasting. After about 48 hours you start to run out of substrate for liver detoxification (many people). In addition to this, people with slow Phase II detoxification will hit a bottleneck and become very ill from intermediate metabolites of detoxification. Many of these intermediates are more toxic than the original target toxin. Lucky individuals, with good reserves and rapid Phase II detox potential, can sail through this and those are the ones who benefit from fasting. They represent a minority. Sometimes those who get ill are labeled as experiencing a " healing crisis " . In actuality they have simply " hit the wall " in terms of their ability to detox safely. Providing some of these substrates can support a nutrient " sparing fast " . Sparing fasts are safer and more effective. There use in cancer is still very debatable. Mike Dorr wrote: > > > Bret: > > I used fasting quite extensive back in 1994 when I was diagnosed with > terminal Stage IV breast cancer. I used colonics as well. > > > > > > Go to this site and learn more about fasting. > > Herbert was so knowledgeable about the body it was frightening. His > books are masterworks. > > Joe > > http://chestofbooks .com/health/ natural-cure/ The-Hygienic- > System-Fasting- and-Sun-Bathing/ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2009 Report Share Posted July 6, 2009 Mike you probably explained why Shelton was adamant about not using water fasting for Cancer. Perhaps your explanation will put this subject to bed rather than my simply saying Shelton did not think Fasting was appropriate for dealing with cancer. None of this has any relevance to other reasons for fasting but it is enough for me as regards cancer. Joe C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.