Guest guest Posted August 18, 2009 Report Share Posted August 18, 2009 The August-September issue (2009) of the Townsend Letter just arrived and this is a cancer issue. I noticed several interesting items that have merit or deserve follow up, but I came across one thing that was quite outstanding. There is an article Vitamins vs. Chemotherapy and Radiation for Cancer Therapy, by Reagan Houston on p.60. In it he reports on the work of Abram Hoffer (RIP) and his results of using vitamin supplements. The selection was quite typical for those on this List. Some variation was that the vitamin C averaged about 12 grams per day. He includes vitamin E succinate [which I also like]. There was nothing remarkable about his other choices. With nutritional supplementation the survival averaged 99 months whereas without supplementation survival averaged 4 months. Even allowing for distortions caused by small sample size this is very significant. In clinical practice when a clinician is confronted with an aggressive advanced cancer, he/she may have to use distortive therapies, wisely choosing therapies that don't worsen immune dysfunction. This buys time to decide on intermediate and long-range strategies in which immune function pulls the laboring oar. Certainly Hoffer's type of supplementation would be welcome. As an aside, sometimes urea can be very useful in cancer therapy -- it is a chaotropic salt and disrupts cancer cell signalling but it dumbs down immune function, so it is probably a poor choice to use with many immune and supplementation therapies. Save the oral urea for the day when flu vaccines with a squalamine adjuvant are imposed. It would be less messy than carving an X at the injection site and sucking out the venom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.