Cancer: conclusions on cause & treatment

[Guest guest]

Certain factors that lead to cancer are beyond individual choices and

control. There are areas of the world where the environmental

conditions induce cancer. Early X-ray exposure, even in the womb

for that matter, can induce structural defects that damage DNA/RNA.

Gofman did a lengthy scientific study on the effects of X-ray

vs. atmospheric background ionizing exposures and concluded that the

earlier in life one is exposed, the more likelihood of developing

cancer. Chest X-rays were forced upon children in the 50s and 60s for

detection of TB. It is now known that leukemia is triggered by these

exposures. Your dentist may have contributed as well as it is

understood that X-rays are cumulative. Mammograms are well-known to

induce the disease and the crushing of the breast tissue can anger

and thus stimulate DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ) {in Situ = in

place} that may have otherwise remained dormant for a lifetime.

Chemicals can induce it. Fluoride and chlorine are imuno suppressors

and even traces of some chemicals are enough to induce the disease.

Most of the time, however, it is the environment in which the cell is

living that causes structural changes and not primarily prior

cellular damage.

Dr. Kasper Blond, a British oncologist published a book in 1954

titled 'The Liver and Cancer,' I am reading it now. This work is so

far, one of the very best books I have read on this topic. He debunks

all of the popular theories such as genetic, structural mutations etc.

here is a excerpt from the forward: by E. Stanley Lee, M.S., F.R.C.S

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

" To our generation the nature of cancer is just as tantalizingly

obscure and mysterious as was the nature of pus to our medical fore

bearers a hundred years ago. Medical thinking of that day was so

hidebound by the humoral theories of diseases that, through all the

means of discovery were at hand, it took the genius of Pasteur and of

Lister to break free and open up the new world of bacteriology and

virology. "

" Now perhaps history is repeating itself. So many diseases proved to

be microbic in origin that our minds have again become enslaved and

cannot freely range in other directions. Cellular pathology, too,

has cast its spell around us. It may be, as the author of this book

maintains, that in our fascinated watching of the cancer cell we

forget to view the body as a whole. Thus we fail to recognize that

some disordered metabolism, outside of the affected cell or organ,

may be the common factor underlying all malignant tumors, enabling

the abnormal cancer cell to compete with and eventually outgrow its

neighbors. "

" Kasper Blond, always an original thinker and a rebel against blind

orthodoxy, has for years been interested in the liver and portal

system.... he has suggested that relatively minor disorders of the

portal system could be the cause of many gastro-intestinal and other

diseases. He has worked out this unifying idea in great detail and

accuses contemporary medicine of being content to apply separate

labels to many local lesions without seeking to discern a common

underlying pathology. "

" Now, in this present book, Blond brings his same thesis to bear on

the problem of malignant disease. His marshalling of facts in the

light of this new conception is impressive and intensely interesting.

The reader may be fascinated, stimulated, or irritated, but cannot

remain indifferent.... "

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Other quotes in the book:

" The changes in the distribution of primary cancers follow distinct

vascular changes corresponding to certain physiological phases of

life. "

" 90 percent of cancers in adults arising in organs connected with

metabolism, in organs drained by the portal vein. "

" Post-menopause, characterized by obliteration of porto-caval shunts,

obliteration of vasa afferentia of the uterus, cancer of the uterus

decreasing, cancer of the breast and of other organs increasing. "

" External cancers are caused by the action of chemical and physical

irritants on normal tissues that are not the sites of displaced

embryonic cells; therefore, there is no reason to believe that

cancers of internal organs must be caused by different agents or

originate from embryonic stem cell nests. "

" Theories of cancer heredity, including the theory..., that cancer

arises from disseminated embryonic cells are mistaken. There is no

hereditary source of cancer. Cancer is caused by environmental

agents. "

" CANCER IS A MUTATION OF SOMATIC TISSUES CAUSED BY CHRONIC DAMAGE TO

THE LIVER. " The structural changes of the somatic tissues are the

result, not the cause, of metabolic disorders. "

" Cancer is the morphological manifestation of a metabloic disorder of

the central organ of metabolism, the liver, in its co-operation with

the other organs of the intestinal tract. "

End fo quotes:

As you can see, this is an extraordinary work! The book is very rare

and my copy came out of a Califormia university via the intra-library

exchange system. I intend to scan this book and I will make it

available to all those who wish a copy for a nominal fee. I will post

when I have it ready.

------------------------------Org Msg--------------------------

> Many people who have successfully beaten cancer have done so by

using

> strict dietary and lifestyle methodology, the most successful

having

> been the Gerson, Ann Wigmore and Budwig protocols.

You're right. Many people have beaten cancer using one of the above

protocols. However, what about those who were using one of those

protocols when healthy, and THEN developed cancer?