Guest guest Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 , When someone says " energy " is it bashing it to smithereens to request a defining of terms, if we are talking about an electro-magnetic energy (e.g. Rife), compressional waves (e.g. ultrasound), or something else? Otherwise, the conversation loses all meaning for communication purposes. Even patrons of the poetic arts would be horrified if the artist served only vague pap. If as a poet you said " the sickly dolorous skies " we would want to know, what? Are the skies mauve, ecru, green, puce, taupe? Similarly, if someone says " intuition " I consider it an open invitation to ask obvious questions that no one can assume the answers to. Is the respondent's intuition better than that of others? How often does their intuition prove to need serious adjustment? Is all their thinking by intuition? How do they handle it if their intuition is contrary to logic, even their own logic? When did they reach intuitive maturity -- three years of age, 21 years old, or maybe just this morning? Does its accuracy correlate with the amount of grog remaining in the flagon? If so, then it can be quantified. , if someone uses intuition because they have a difficult time learning or reasoning, they should not be too proud to say so. Not everyone is blessed with these necessary skills. For me it is very rewarding to help bring such people up to speed. This task can't be done with the congenitally mentally handicapped. It can be done with most new-age votaries. Slavek, Eight years ago I made these HCl solutions for injection at the behest of a wealthy patron who wanted to use them for proleptic purposes. I can't say that I saw benefit beyond the standard benefits one gets by stimulating immune function by repeatedly traumatizing tissue. Almost anything that tears up some muscle does the same thing. I know a fellow in Reno who was getting identical results with gluteal injections of ozonated olive oil. I have seen the same from the erstwhile soviet use of burning the skin to stimulate healing. If anyone wants help I am for hire -- but you pay for the cohibas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 Hi , For some it is miracles, for some it is spontaneous remissions and for some its a daily routine. I am with you on this one. With kind regards, Slavek. From: melizzard@... Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 I think you know that we aren't talking about Rife or ultrasound. Energy work is in a category all by itself because we are energy. Energy can be manipulated. So energy workers can access one's energy field to release restrictions and blockages for a free-er flow and that helps to correct lots of different things. There is also intrusive energy that destroys. That can be just as useful as gamma knife radiation if one responds well to such aggressive energy, which I do not. Actually " sickly dolorous skies " works just fine for me because I can fill in the shade with my own imagination. I know you are unfamiliar with working with either energy or intuition. There are things that can be known even though it makes no sense. There are people getting well all the time when it's supposed to be impossible. It's the place where miracles exist ... or what people call miracles. They're only miracles because the conventional mind says it's impossible. But that's just a limitation of an intellectual mind. I'll stay in my little unquantifiable world. It seems to be the only thing that works for me anyway. xxoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 please let me know all you can about you subject in this e mail, will value it a lot since I need to find all ways possible to us to heal our body thank you From: melizzard@... Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 I think you know that we aren't talking about Rife or ultrasound. Energy work is in a category all by itself because we are energy. Energy can be manipulated. So energy workers can access one's energy field to release restrictions and blockages for a free-er flow and that helps to correct lots of different things. There is also intrusive energy that destroys. That can be just as useful as gamma knife radiation if one responds well to such aggressive energy, which I do not. Actually " sickly dolorous skies " works just fine for me because I can fill in the shade with my own imagination. I know you are unfamiliar with working with either energy or intuition. There are things that can be known even though it makes no sense. There are people getting well all the time when it's supposed to be impossible. It's the place where miracles exist ... or what people call miracles. They're only miracles because the conventional mind says it's impossible. But that's just a limitation of an intellectual mind. I'll stay in my little unquantifiable world. It seems to be the only thing that works for me anyway. xxoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 I wanted to post regarding the bias towards energy work etc. There are many books filled with studies supporting intention, healing, energy and the like. Here are a few for consideration for those inclined to research: The Biology of Belief (Unleashing the Power of Consciousness, Matter and Miracles) By Bruce H. Lipton, PhD The Intention Experiment by Lynne McTaggart The Spontaneous Healing of Belief (Shattering the Paradigm of False Limits) by Gregg Braden The Genie in your Genes (Epigenetic Medicine and the New Biology of Intention) by Dawson Church, Ph.D. Chasing The Cure (An Effective Alternative for Treating Cancer and Other Diseases) by Bengston Ph.D. with Sylvia Fraser Much of the difference in these considerations being discussed seems to me to be the difference in Newtonian and Quantum Physics. The healing, intentions, consciousness, beliefs discussion is on the quantum physics level. So those who would like to know more may want to check out this material also! I'm so glad we have this place to discuss our opinions and differences while allowing the same for all! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 writes: " I wanted to post regarding the bias towards energy work etc. There are many books filled with studies supporting intention, healing, energy and the like... " ----------- Each of these metaphysical-associated notions must be either real or not real. If they are not real then they can be enjoyed like any other fantasy. If they are real then they should be granted full admission into our shared objective reality. The price of admission though includes implicit permission to prod them and poke them and turn them every which way. There must be a willingness to jump certain hurdles: 1. Occam's Razor or the Law of Parsimony. Is there a more simple explanation? 2. Carl Sagan's dictum: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. 3. Hume's Self-observation: Is it more likely that a miracle has occurred or that I have been deceived? 4. And all of science expects reproducibility: Can we set up an irrefutable experiment? Humans have a most incredible ability to believe most anything. Nowhere is this more evident than when we examine other people's religions, yet we put our own cherished beliefs on the same footing that we grant the hard sciences. We will write and read the most wonderful books that support our own preconceptions and fume at the ignorance and closed-mindedness of those horrible hominids who have not yet evolved enough to accept our obvious truths and revelations. But then the method of science is all too often flawed in application by the annoying human foibles of hubris, superciliousness, rigid indoctrination, a pointy-headed reductionism, over-reliance on symbol and metaphor, and deviance wrought by greed, the pursuit of power, and hidden agendas. I think a good starting place for resolution is to assume that half of what we know is just plain wrong and the other half should forever remain suspect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Greetings, I am very careful of the mind, it is powerful. It can be trained to allow a barefooted human to walk across a bed of coals without getting burned. This is not belief, but proven fact. How the mind does this, is not understood, but that it can do it, is a fact. Many scientists have tried to debunk this as a myth, only to find that it can be done. We know very little about the mind. I know it has power to heal me, and that nothing can heal me if I don't believe it will. I watched a step sister die of cancer because she believed the tin god of a doctor that told her she would never ski, or hike or be physically active again after her treatments. She had stage one uterine cancer, easily beatable but eleven months later, she was dead of her own choice. She didn't believe life would be worth living. Which technique, if any, will work for any person on this list, depends on their beliefs. We are just learning our environment. Mankind has only scratched he surface of knowledge. We just discovered a whole family of beings that populate our world, and that are extremely numerous around the year 2000. We are just learning how our soil works to give us healthy food. Our knowledge of the mind is way behind the soil sciences. While, I would hate to see anyone give up their life, by following the latest fad. I do know that visualization is a powerful tool, along side other tools, to help keep disease at bay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.