Guest guest Posted August 15, 2010 Report Share Posted August 15, 2010 Quote from article: > " Now the team hopes to develop a drug that might stop tumor cells from making use of fructose. " > I find it frightening that instead of trying to fix the problem and reduce the fructose in the American diet, they look for drugs to fix the symptoms with yet a new drug! Patti J Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2010 Report Share Posted August 16, 2010 Hi Patti, Fructose is the sugar in fruit (as well as in junk food as high fructose corn syrup). Fruit has a fairly good reputation as being a health food with lots of terrific benefits for those who are trying to be healthy. So, I'm personally okay with a drug that stops cancer cells from making use of fructose if it means I could still drink my yummy fruit smoothies every day. ar > > Quote from article: > > " Now the team hopes to develop a drug that might stop tumor cells from making use of fructose. " > > > > I find it frightening that instead of trying to fix the problem and reduce the fructose in the American diet, they look for drugs to fix the symptoms with yet a new drug! > > Patti J > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Ar Fructose is definitely the main sugar in fruit, but that is not where the majority of Americans get their Fructose.... the amount of fructose that we consume has been increased a huge amount with the mass distribution of " high fructose corn syrup " . Natural fruit has other redeeming qualities so I suspect that moderation of natural fruit is probably a good thing. From Medscape: All evidence suggests that fructose ingestion has been rising steadily for a long time[2,3] ( Table ), but analyses have been hampered in part by the lack of good data. Vos and her colleagues make an important step in remedying this lack of data. They obtained information from one of the recent surveys of the eating habits of Americans, called the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, conducted from 1988 to 1994. It is clear from the analysis that Americans are getting a lot of fructose in their diet. Mean daily consumption of fructose was 54.7 g/d, with a range of 38.4 to 72.8 g/d, and accounted for 10.2% of total daily caloric intake. Consumption was highest among adolescents (12- to 18-year-olds), who consumed 72.8 g/d, or more than 12% of their total calories from fructose. One fourth of this group consumed at least 15% of calories from fructose. The largest source of fructose was sugar-sweetened beverages (30%), followed by grains (22%) and fruit/fruit juice (19%). http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/575891 Hi Patti, Fructose is the sugar in fruit (as well as in junk food as high fructose corn syrup). Fruit has a fairly good reputation as being a health food with lots of terrific benefits for those who are trying to be healthy. So, I'm personally okay with a drug that stops cancer cells from making use of fructose if it means I could still drink my yummy fruit smoothies every day. ar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Additionally Patti, the more an article is read it comes down to the 'High Fructose Corn syrup', the combination of Glucose and Fructose making it the 'High Fructose'. Then we have the issue of fruit juices which, without the pulp, is truly high in sugar content and changes how the body deals with it. The benefits of whole fruits far outweigh any sugar concerns except...perhaps, when one is dealing with active and aggressive cancers. I say perhaps because I do not really know. One needs to give serious thoughts about using a drug that alters how the body reacts to good food. Smoothies, as the name implies, should contain all of the pulp of the fruits used in their making. The " Cancer Feeds on Sugar " is a lot more complex than avoiding fruit because our bodies make glucose from the raw materials pumped into it. I suppose if one is consuming only fruit, or mostly fruit, a price will eventually be paid because of the lack of minerals and other factors found in vegetables. A well-made smoothie a day would be of no concern to me regarding its sugar content. All the science in the world never convinced me that a candy bar and a dish of Blueberries are one and the same. Joe C. From: Patti Juengst Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 8:44 AM Subject: [ ] Re: Cancer cells feed on fructose, study finds Ar Fructose is definitely the main sugar in fruit, but that is not where the majority of Americans get their Fructose.... the amount of fructose that we consume has been increased a huge amount with the mass distribution of " high fructose corn syrup " . Natural fruit has other redeeming qualities so I suspect that moderation of natural fruit is probably a good thing. From Medscape: All evidence suggests that fructose ingestion has been rising steadily for a long time[2,3] ( Table ), but analyses have been hampered in part by the lack of good data. Vos and her colleagues make an important step in remedying this lack of data. They obtained information from one of the recent surveys of the eating habits of Americans, called the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, conducted from 1988 to 1994. It is clear from the analysis that Americans are getting a lot of fructose in their diet. Mean daily consumption of fructose was 54.7 g/d, with a range of 38.4 to 72.8 g/d, and accounted for 10.2% of total daily caloric intake. Consumption was highest among adolescents (12- to 18-year-olds), who consumed 72.8 g/d, or more than 12% of their total calories from fructose. One fourth of this group consumed at least 15% of calories from fructose. The largest source of fructose was sugar-sweetened beverages (30%), followed by grains (22%) and fruit/fruit juice (19%). http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/575891 Hi Patti, Fructose is the sugar in fruit (as well as in junk food as high fructose corn syrup). Fruit has a fairly good reputation as being a health food with lots of terrific benefits for those who are trying to be healthy. So, I'm personally okay with a drug that stops cancer cells from making use of fructose if it means I could still drink my yummy fruit smoothies every day. ar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 The research was flawed , in my humble opinion, as they included people consuming high fructose from GMO corn syrup in the study.. Yeah something that turn on and off more than 200 of our genes.. genes. If they really want to know the effect of fructose we have enough population on the planet who never had access to fructose from corn syrup in their lives to do any research.. ========================================= ScienceDaily (Aug. 27, 2009) — Researchers have established the conditions that foster formation of potentially dangerous levels of a toxic substance in the high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) that is often fed to honey bees. Their study, which appears in the current issue of ACS' bi-weekly Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, may also have implications for soft drinks and dozens of other human foods that contain HFCS. The substance, hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), forms mainly from heating fructose... ================================================= <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100322204628.htm> Eating High Levels Of Fructose Impairs Memory In Rats <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090716113247.htm> (Aug. 1, 2009) — Researchers have found that diets high in fructose -- a type of sugar found in most processed foods and beverages -- impaired the spatial memory of adult ... > read more <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090716113247.htm> Fructose Sets Table For Weight Gain Without Warning <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081016074701.htm> (Oct. 19, 2008) — Eating too much fructose can induce leptin resistance, a condition that can easily lead to becoming overweight when combined with a high-fat, high-calorie diet, according to a new study with ... > read more <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081016074701.htm> Fructose-Sweetened Drinks Increase Nonfasting Triglycerides In Obese Adults <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090212161819.htm> (Feb. 23, 2009) — Obese people who drink fructose-sweetened beverages with their meals have an increased rise of triglycerides following the meal, according to new research. This effect was especially pronounced in ... > read more <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090212161819.htm> Fructose Metabolism By The Brain Increases Food Intake And Obesity, Review Suggests <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090325091811.htm> (Mar. 26, 2009) — Scientists have built on the suggested link between the consumption of fructose and increased food intake, which may contribute to a high incidence of obesity and type 2 ... > read more <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090325091811.htm> ============================================ The Murky World of High-Fructose Corn Syruphttp://www.trit.us/motherlinda/cornsyrup.html High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is produced by processing corn starch to yield glucose, and then processing the glucose to produce a high percentage of fructose. It all sounds rather simple--white cornstarch is turned into crystal clear syrup. However, the process is actually very complicated. Three different enzymes are needed to break down cornstarch, which is composed of chains of glucose molecules of almost infinite length, into the simple sugars glucose and fructose. First, cornstarch is treated with alpha-amylase to produce shorter chains of sugars called polysaccharides. Alpha-amylase is industrially produced by a bacterium, usually Bacillus sp. It is purified and then shipped to HFCS manufacturers. Next, an enzyme called glucoamylase breaks the sugar chains down even further to yield the simple sugar glucose. Unlike alpha-amylase, glucoamylase is produced by Aspergillus, a fungus, in a fermentation vat where one would likely see little balls of Aspergillus floating on the top. The third enzyme, glucose-isomerase, is very expensive. It converts glucose to a mixture of about 42 percent fructose and 50-52 percent glucose with some other sugars mixed in. While alpha-amylase and glucoamylase are added directly to the slurry, pricey glucose-isomerase is packed into columns and the sugar mixture is then passed over it. Inexpensive alpha-amylase and glucoamylase are used only once, glucose-isomerase is reused until it loses most of its activity. There are two more steps involved. First is a liquid chromatography step that takes the mixture to 90 percent fructose. Finally, this is back-blended with the original mixture to yield a final concentration of about 55 percent fructose--what the industry calls high fructose corn syrup. HFCS has the exact same sweetness and taste as an equal amount of sucrose from cane or beet sugar but it is obviously much more complicated to make, involving vats of murky fermenting liquid, fungus and chemical tweaking, all of which take place in one of 16 chemical plants located in the Corn Belt. Yet in spite of all the special enzymes required, HFCS is actually cheaper than sugar. It is also very easy to transport--it's just piped into tanker trucks. This translates into lower costs and higher profits for food producers. The development of the HFCS process came at an opportune time for corn growers. Refinements of the partial hydrogenation process had made it possible to get better shortenings and margarines out of soybeans than corn. HFCS took up the slack as demand for corn oil margarine declined. Lysine, an amino acid, can be produced from the corn residue after the glucose is removed. This is the modus operandi of the food conglomerates--break down commodities into their basic components and then put them back together again as processed food. Today HFCS is used to sweeten jams, condiments like ketchup, and soft drinks. It is also a favorite ingredient in many so-called health foods. Four companies control 85 percent of the $2.6 billion business--Archer s Midland, Cargill, Staley Manufacturing Co. and CPC International. In the mid-1990s, ADM was the object of an FBI probe into price fixing of three products--HFCS, citric acid and lysine--and consumers got a glimpse of the murky world of corporate manipulation. There's a couple of other murky things that consumers should know about HFCS. According to a food technology expert, two of the enzymes used, alpha-amylase and glucose-isomerase, are genetically modified to make them more stable. Enzymes are actually very large proteins and through genetic modification specific amino acids in the enzymes are changed or replaced so the enzyme's " backbone " won't break down or unfold. This allows the industry to get the enzymes to higher temperatures before they become unstable. Consumers trying to avoid genetically modified foods should avoid HFCS. It is almost certainly made from genetically modified corn and then it is processed with genetically modified enzymes. I've seen some estimates claiming that virtually everything--almost 80 percent--of what we eat today has been genetically modified at some point. Since the use of HFCS is so prevalent in processed foods, those figures may be right. But there's another reason to avoid HFCS. Consumers may think that because it contains fructose--which they associate with fruit, which is a natural food--that it is healthier than sugar. A team of investigators at the USDA, led by Dr. Meira Field, has discovered that this just ain't so. Sucrose is composed of glucose and fructose. When sugar is given to rats in high amounts, the rats develop multiple health problems, especially when the rats were deficient in certain nutrients, such as copper. The researchers wanted to know whether it was the fructose or the glucose moiety that was causing the problems. So they repeated their studies with two groups of rats, one given high amounts of glucose and one given high amounts of fructose. The glucose group was unaffected but the fructose group had disastrous results. The male rats did not reach adulthood. They had anemia, high cholesterol and heart hypertrophy--that means that their hearts enlarged until they exploded. They also had delayed testicular development. Dr. Field explains that fructose in combination with copper deficiency in the growing animal interferes with collagen production. (Copper deficiency, by the way, is widespread in America.) In a nutshell, the little bodies of the rats just fell apart. The females were not so affected, but they were unable to produce live young. " The medical profession thinks fructose is better for diabetics than sugar, " says Dr. Field, " but every cell in the body can metabolize glucose. However, all fructose must be metabolized in the liver. The livers of the rats on the high fructose diet looked like the livers of alcoholics, plugged with fat and cirrhotic. " HFCS contains more fructose than sugar and this fructose is more immediately available because it is not bound up in sucrose. Since the effects of fructose are most severe in the growing organism, we need to think carefully about what kind of sweeteners we give to our children. Fruit juices should be strictly avoided--they are very high in fructose--but so should anything with HFCS. Interestingly, although HFCS is used in many products aimed at children, it is not used in baby formula, even though it would probably save the manufactueres a few pennies for each can. Do the formula makers know something they aren't telling us? Pretty murky! Read the all article at : ============================== > Hi Patti, > > Fructose is the sugar in fruit (as well as in junk food as high fructose corn syrup). Fruit has a fairly good reputation as being a health food with lots of terrific benefits for those who are trying to be healthy. So, I'm personally okay with a drug that stops cancer cells from making use of fructose if it means I could still drink my yummy fruit smoothies every day. > > ar > > > > > > Quote from article: > > > " Now the team hopes to develop a drug that might stop tumor cells from making use of fructose. " > > > > > > > I find it frightening that instead of trying to fix the problem and reduce the fructose in the American diet, they look for drugs to fix the symptoms with yet a new drug! > > > > Patti J > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.