Guest guest Posted May 14, 2002 Report Share Posted May 14, 2002 Hi Hanna: You wrote: " barry made a comment about hulda clark's information being innacurate regarding intestinal fluke. something to the extent that they are only from asia. paraphrase-- do i have this right? " I'm the one who wrote that the fluke that says is inside all cancer is regionalized to SE Asia. From 's TCFAD page 33: " Fasciolopsis buskii is the fluke (flatworm) that I find in every case of cancer, HIV infection, Alzheimers, Crohn's disase, Kaposi's, endometriosis, and in many people without these diseases.... " From: http://www.cdfound.to.it/HTML/fas2.htm " Fasciolopsis buski: is endemic in China, Taiwan, South-East Asia, Malaysia and India. " " F.buski is the human largest intestinal fluke. The adult measures 2-7,5 cm by 0.8-2 cm by 0,5-3 mm and lives in the small intestine and occasionally in the colon and the pylorus attached to the mucosa. Light infection are usually asymptomatic, but heavily infected individuals may present abdominal pain, diarrhea, malabsorption, toxemia. " In the various stages of the F. buski, it is required to spend time outside of the body of a human or a pig in order to complete its life cycle. In other words, this fluke cannot reproduce all the phases of its life cycle within the human body. It is found only in the regions mentioned above, or enters people who have traveled through that area of the world. No fasciolopsis buski (or buskii, as spells it) have ever been found in cancer in humans in No. America or Europe. If you have passed flukes, then either they are not the kind that is describing, or you should take them directly to her so that she can finally have something to display to the world. So far, she hasn't. Jay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2002 Report Share Posted May 14, 2002 barry made a comment about hulda clark's information being innacurate regarding intestinal fluke. something to the extent that they are only from asia. paraphrase-- do i have this right? i have never been to asia, and have passed hundreds of intestinal flukes. along with hundreds of ascaris. some of them over 2 feet in length. i do think that alot of dr clark's assumptions are b.s. concering the presence of parasites. my health is not improved after the passing of these parasites. so i think she has it wrong about them being the cause of disease. rather i think they are a symptom of disease. i began passing parasites a few weeks after i had my amalgams replaced 8 years ago. so i think there is some relationship. exactly what the relationship is, i don't know. i think zapping is b.s. there are alot better ways to rid oneself of parasites, if you want to obsess about them. but i do like what she has to say about chemicals and metals. and i do like her repackaging of this liver cleansing folk remedy. i think she got it from hanna kroeger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2002 Report Share Posted May 14, 2002 > From: JayTownsend@a... > No fasciolopsis buski (or buskii, as spells it) have ever been found in cancer in humans in No. America or Europe. How do you know that, Jay? Have you personally checked them all? Such sweeping absurd generalizations make me wonder if you are " the " Barrett himself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2002 Report Share Posted May 14, 2002 have never understood why people resort to absurd statements like this when they don't like what someone has to say. I don't believe that you truky think that Jay is Barrett. You are just trying to ruffle his feathers. What a shame. Please, let's don't ruffle your feathers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 wrote: " " > From: JayTownsend@a... > No fasciolopsis buski (or buskii, as spells it) have ever been found in cancer in humans in No. America or Europe. How do you know that, Jay? Have you personally checked them all? Such sweeping absurd generalizations make me wonder if you are " the " Barrett himself? " " It is a very sweeping statement, and it is true! , please take a look at the map at the following website, it contains the area, in red, which is the only place in the entire world where the fasciolopsis buski are found. This site is maintained by Ohio State University, and many of the statements are made by Dr. P.W. Pappas, a parasitologist, not an M. D. He was also an expert witness in the lawsuit that you incorrectly identified as Barrett's " failed " or " thrown out " lawsuit. The site you listed was in fact the trial of the FDA against a Blaine Washington Zapper sales organization. And, the FDA won. http://www.uoguelph.ca/~kkolas/fluke.html Regarding the fasciolopsis buski's association with cancer, AIDS or anything else this is what Dr. Pappas has to say: " Fasciolopsis buski, the human intestinal fluke, is an organism that is endemic in several southeast and south asian countries (e.g. China, Taiwan, India, Bangladesh, Thailand). There is no scientific evidence that the intestinal fluke is distributed world-wide, nor is there any evidence that the organism (or its life stages) is present in cases of cancer or AIDS. The definitive hosts for F. buski are humans and pigs. Infections can be diagnosed by isolating eggs from an infected person's feces. " , endemic means " restricted or peculiar to a locality or region <endemic diseases> <an endemic species>. " That means it ain't found outside of that little red area of Asia. Pappas even says that there isn't any evidence that it " is present in cases of cancer or AIDS. " None, zero, zilch, nada - not even in that area of SE Asia where these little rascals live! What more evidence do you need . Pappas goes on to say: " F. buski is a very large organism, measuring up to 7 centimeters (2.5 inches) long. It is not possible that oncologists and pathologist have somehow missed these infections on post mortems of cancer victims. Yet Hulda claims she sees F. buski or F. buski life stages in ALL cancer cases. " A 2 ½ inch critter in a removed cancer would be rather difficult to miss. Pappas says " IT IS NOT POSSIBLE that oncologists and pathologists have...missed these... " - Which is what I said and is repeated by parasitologists and other scientists throughout the world. If you go to: http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/clarkaff/pappas.html you will find detailed statements by Pappas in relation to many erroneous statements by , including this one: " 14. There is overwhelming evidence in the form of peer-reviewed articles appearing in scientific journals that virtually all types of cancer result from the uncontrolled division of cells, and that the uncontrolled division of cells has a genetic basis. That is, cancer is caused by the activation or inactivation of specific genes that control the division of cells; it is not caused by a parasite. If this parasite truly causes cancer and, therefore, kills thousands of people each year, how could this parasite go unnoticed? Even in areas of the world where Fasciolopsis buski is endemic, there are no published studies that demonstrate (1) a relationship between this parasite and cancer and (2) that curing this parasite cures cancer. The only studies that support these theories are those mentioned in 's books, and her studies lack scientific integrity. Similarly, there is overwhelming evidence that AIDS is caused by HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), not a parasite. " In the site with the map is a quote from an alternative health practitioner: " What is lacking in all this is not only logic, but any data to support Hulda 's contention that she can cure cancer. I once requested from a major promoter the names of people who had been cured of cancer by her method. The only reply I got was a fax from a kindly old gentleman who told me that he " knew " he had cancer from the small bore (diameter) of his bowel movements. On his own, he began treatment with Hulda 's three-herb program. After taking the treatment, he exulted, " I pooped like a horse! " That is what passes for proof of " the cure for all cancers. " -from pg. 212, " Herbs Against Cancer: History and Controversy " copyright 1998 Ralph Moss, Ph.D. There are many other sites that are not authored by Barrett that state that 's ideas are not valid. Remember, it is reported that 's own brother died from cancer, even after being treated by Hulda. Quite an item to tack onto your resume - eh what? as you continue to try and put me down personally, I relish it because when you do that I know that you don't have one shred of physical evidence that 's fluke theory of disease (or gallstones) has any merit. The supporters have always used name calling (Tim Bolin's sites are full of it) instead of any evidence supporting 's claims. Jay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 >>Such sweeping absurd generalizations make me wonder if you are " the " Barrett himself?<< I have never understood why people resort to absurd statements like this when they don't like what someone has to say. I don't believe that you truky think that Jay is Barrett. You are just trying to ruffle his feathers. What a shame. Debra _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2002 Report Share Posted May 15, 2002 Arthur, Wasn't me. I've never had that problem and haven't been to Asia, yet. Barry. > barry made a comment about hulda clark's information being innacurate regarding intestinal fluke. something to the extent that they are only from asia. paraphrase-- do i have this right? > > i have never been to asia, and have passed hundreds of intestinal flukes. along with hundreds of ascaris. some of them over 2 feet in length. i do think that alot of dr clark's assumptions are b.s. concering the presence of parasites. my health is not improved after the passing of these parasites. so i think she has it wrong about them being the cause of disease. rather i think they are a symptom of disease. i began passing parasites a few weeks after i had my amalgams replaced 8 years ago. so i think there is some relationship. exactly what the relationship is, i don't know. i think zapping is b.s. there are alot better ways to rid oneself of parasites, if you want to obsess about them. but i do like what she has to say about chemicals and metals. and i do like her repackaging of this liver cleansing folk remedy. i think she got it from hanna kroeger. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.