Re: Re: cancer, Natural Cures

[Guest guest]

The Nobel Prize and Otto Warburg's name keep popping up however, he did not

receive a Noble Prize for proving what caused or how to cure cancer. This

will come up again and again, however here's why he did received the prize:

" The discovery for which the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine is to be

awarded today concerns intracellular combustion: that fundamental vital process

by which substances directly supplied to cells or stored in them are broken down

into simpler components while using up oxygen. It is by this process that the

energy required for other vital processes is made available to the cells in a

form capable of immediate utilization. " It goes on to say, Wartburg " called it

Respiration "

Joe C.

[Guest guest]

Hi Joe,

Right. I believe that I would like to add that when I started to inquire

into the health issues almost two months ago I was lucky enough to come

across the page maintained by the family of Ph.D., M.D. F. Koch.

Going through all there is and it is a pile, having some basic knowledge

of chemistry and a fair bit of standard as well as weird physics, I was

able to appreciate how far and how well did Dr. Koch develop on the

works of Otto Warburg.

I would strongly recommend to anyone with the basics chemistry to go

through it too, as it explains not only the oxidation processes in the

body, but also the dehydrogenation, and removal of pathogens on the

cellular level. His inheritance as incomplete as it is has really helped

me to understand other researchers works.

Even though Dr. W.F.Koch site does not mention this, Jim Humble has dug

up somewhere that what is sold as stabilized oxygen, read weak MMS, was

actually Dr. W.F.Koch's handiwork. Funny enough, when I have looked up

the C2O2 molecule on wikipedia and before going through Jim Humble

references, it occurred to me that it looked like something W.F.Koch may

have come up with.

F. Koch was a genius as far as I am concerned.

http://www.williamfkoch.com

With kind regards, Slavek

JCastron1 wrote:

>

>

>

> The Nobel Prize and Otto Warburg's name keep popping up however, he

> did not receive a Noble Prize for proving what caused or how to cure

> cancer. This will come up again and again, however here's why he did

> received the prize:

> " The discovery for which the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine is

> to be awarded today concerns intracellular combustion: that

> fundamental vital process by which substances directly supplied to

> cells or stored in them are broken down into simpler components while

> using up oxygen. It is by this process that the energy required for

> other vital processes is made available to the cells in a form capable

> of immediate utilization. " It goes on to say, Wartburg " called it

> Respiration "

>

> Joe C.