Re: Fwd: [Longevity] The Light That Kills Breast Cancer

[Guest guest]

Well, if it's the photodynamic therapy that first started here it wasn't lazer,

 it was U.V. light.

 

That's why no sunlight.

 

The drugs they injected weren't drugs, they were chlorophyll and " molecular

oxygen " which is  ozone.

 

They stimulated chlorophyll with U.V. because then it churns out tons of oxygen

and consumed carbon dioxide!

 

The therapy worked because cancers ferment glucose, an anaerobic process, eating

carbon dioxide and adding oxygen raises ph also, inside cancer cells.

 

They patented it as photodynamic therapy. Such a fancy name!

 

Notice how close to an alternative treatment it is, shameful!

 

I drink chlorophyll every day and get u.v. light.

 

This German/English skin on my body is mighty pale and I never use sunscreen

anymore!

 

Bret

ll..

From: stardorabellsouth (DOT) net

Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:56:11 -0400

Subject: [Longevity] The Light That Kills Breast Cancer

To:

Cc: AAR <AntiAgingResearch>, Longevity@grou ps.com

The Light That Kills Breast Cancer

Monday, July 6, 2009 9:57 AM

By: Sylvia Booth Hubbard

http://www.newsmax. com/health/ light_kills_ breast_cancer/ 2009/07/06/

232289.html

British doctors have unveiled a breast cancer procedure that destroys

tumors with laser light. The revolutionary treatment, which can be carried

out in mere minutes, works without surgery and without harming healthy

cells.

The technique, called " photodynamic therapy " or PDT, has previously

been used on cancers of the mouth and skin, but this is the first test on

primary breast cancer. The initial clinical trial will be held this year,

and is being led by Mo Keshtgar at the Royal Free Hospital in London.

PDT begins with the injection of a drug into the patient's bloodstream

that makes cancer cells highly sensitive to light. The drug finds its way

into the breast's epithelial cells, accumulating in cancer cells. It prefers

cancer cells to normal cells because it is attracted to the numerous new

blood vessels surrounding cancerous tumors that exhibit high metabolic

activity. As soon as the cancer cells take up the drug, surgeons hit the

tumor with a blast from a low-powered red laser, triggering a chemical

reaction that destroys it.

After several hours, the drug loses its potency. Patients, however,

are kept in a dimly-lit environment for 24 hours, then cautioned to avoid

bright sunlight for another 24.

" The key appeal is that it attacks and destroys cancer cells while

retaining the viability of the surrounding normal cells, " Keshtgar said.

" Our treatment will keep the structure of the connective tissue intact,

meaning the breast does not become deformed or lose shape. "

The trial will be conducted on twenty breast cancer patients scheduled

for mastectomies. Just prior to surgery, they will have PDT, followed by

examination of the tissue to evaluate PDT's effect. If the first trial shows

promise, larger trials will follow. After proper testing, the researchers

say, the technique could be available within six years. Trials are already

underway for other cancers, including prostate, bile duct, and pancreatic

cancer.

The chance of a woman developing breast cancer during her life is

about 1 in 8; it is the most common cancer in American women except for skin

cancer, with about 190,000 new cases being diagnosed every year.

[Guest guest]

interesting... i thot our bodies could not digest chlorophyll... how do you

take it if it can't be assimilated?

Kelvin

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Bret Peirce <patientadvocate2@...>wrote:

>

>

> Well, if it's the photodynamic therapy that first started here it wasn't

> lazer,

> it was U.V. light.

>

> That's why no sunlight.

>

> The drugs they injected weren't drugs, they were chlorophyll and " molecular

> oxygen " which is ozone.

>

> They stimulated chlorophyll with U.V. because then it churns out tons of

> oxygen and consumed carbon dioxide!

>

> The therapy worked because cancers ferment glucose, an anaerobic process,

> eating carbon dioxide and adding oxygen raises ph also, inside cancer cells.

>

> They patented it as photodynamic therapy. Such a fancy name!

>

> Notice how close to an alternative treatment it is, shameful!

>

> I drink chlorophyll every day and get u.v. light.

>

> This German/English skin on my body is mighty pale and I never use

> sunscreen anymore!

>

> Bret

>

[Guest guest]

There is more than one way for Photodynamic Therapy to be used and for different

purposes. In one instance a 'Blue Light', simply a blue light is used after a

specific 'drug' (Chemical) is introduced where they want the therapy. The Blue

light is not laser.

In other cases a Red Light is used and in some instances this is called a Laser.

Different chemicals are used for different types of Photodynamic Therapy and it

is still considered experimental and I would not hold my breath wafting for it

to be the answer to all our prayers. Read up on it and you get the usual

gobbledygook about " response " , both partial and complete and by now many of us

have learned it simply means tumor shrinkage and does not necessarily relate to

survivability. If there is a 'partial response' that means partial shrinkage.

Will it kill all cancer cells? Let the trials begin.

There already is a workable minimally invasive procedure using RFA or Radio

Frequency Ablation whereby a probe is inserted in a 1/2 " incision and the tumor

is 'cooked' to death. I personally know someone that had suggested

explore this because she was panicking over an impending surgical procedure to

remove a cancerous tumor. She had a 1 hour outpaitent procedure and that was

it.

I suppose the Blue Light, Red Light treatment might be better than standard

surgery especially as regards 'seeding' of cancer cells but folks, we've been

watching the cancer industry and their 'breakthroughs' for 40 years during The

War On Cancer and old-timers like me for over 60 years. Sit back and take a

breath and watch the waters part. Like RFA, not everyone will be a candidate

and we need some watchful waiting to see how effective it is.

Joe C.

[Guest guest]

Pure chlorophyll yes.

 

The kind we take is called chlorophyllin

From: Kelvin <kelvin.internet@...>

Subject: Re: [ ] Fwd: [Longevity] The Light That Kills Breast Cancer

Date: Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 1:34 AM

interesting. .. i thot our bodies could not digest chlorophyll. .. how do you

take it if it can't be assimilated?

Kelvin

[Guest guest]

interesting... that's identified as a food additive... i guess it has to be

altered so that the body CAN assimilate it.

hmmm... too bad that goes against one of my criteria for general health

protocol....

Kelvin

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Bret Peirce <patientadvocate2@...>wrote:

>

>

> Pure chlorophyll yes.

>

> The kind we take is called chlorophyllin

>

[Guest guest]

" ...and that was it " meaning what? the cancer is gone? How long ago was that?

Thanks

>

> There is more than one way for Photodynamic Therapy to be used and for

different purposes. In one instance a 'Blue Light', simply a blue light is

used after a specific 'drug' (Chemical) is introduced where they want the

therapy. The Blue light is not laser.

>

> In other cases a Red Light is used and in some instances this is called a

Laser.

>

> Different chemicals are used for different types of Photodynamic Therapy and

it is still considered experimental and I would not hold my breath wafting for

it to be the answer to all our prayers. Read up on it and you get the usual

gobbledygook about " response " , both partial and complete and by now many of us

have learned it simply means tumor shrinkage and does not necessarily relate to

survivability. If there is a 'partial response' that means partial shrinkage.

Will it kill all cancer cells? Let the trials begin.

>

> There already is a workable minimally invasive procedure using RFA or Radio

Frequency Ablation whereby a probe is inserted in a 1/2 " incision and the tumor

is 'cooked' to death. I personally know someone that had suggested

explore this because she was panicking over an impending surgical procedure to

remove a cancerous tumor. She had a 1 hour outpaitent procedure and that was

it.

>

> I suppose the Blue Light, Red Light treatment might be better than standard

surgery especially as regards 'seeding' of cancer cells but folks, we've been

watching the cancer industry and their 'breakthroughs' for 40 years during The

War On Cancer and old-timers like me for over 60 years. Sit back and take a

breath and watch the waters part. Like RFA, not everyone will be a candidate

and we need some watchful waiting to see how effective it is.

>

> Joe C.

>

>