Guest guest Posted August 4, 2002 Report Share Posted August 4, 2002 Hello, Sorry, I accidently sent an e-mail that had nothing in it. Let me start by saying that I was going to do a cleanse tomorrow, and I've been putting my cleanse off since Feb. 25. For one reason or another, there hasn't been time or I haven't had problems scheduling, which has started me to thinking, and I wish to have the answers from several experienced GB cleansing people. Why must I do this if I feel fine? I know that we're supposed to get everything out of us that we can. I wanted to do this cleanse closer to Yahweh's feast days so I'd be ready for the feast days, but like I said, I did the cleanse on Feb. 25th, and since I've been using Beta-TCP and magnesium citrate caps daily, I'm feeling very fine. The Beta is supposed to thin the bile to keep you from forming more stones, the magnesium relaxes the bile ducts. Then I maintain healthy eating habits. Honestly, I can't eat otherwise than healthy now, even though every once in a while I get sloppy. Let me state that several months ago, probably in about April, I talked to my two friends who've been doing the GB cleanse for about 10 years now. They both do Dr. ' cleanse method and were astounded because I was doing this once a month . They both said: It's too much! They also said, once or twice a year is fine, but don't do this too much. Again, these guys still have their GBs and don't have problems. Like them, I've changed my diet, too. Yes, they both eat very healthy, and so do I. These guys had horrible attacks until they did the cleanses. So they truly understand. Their doctors wanted them to have surgery over 10 years ago. So then I thought about Dawn when she just had the surgery and about what she remembered the surgeon said, Your bile ducts are too enlarged. Sorry, don't remember the exact words that she used. Then I started thinking, maybe the time in between cleanses allows our bile ducts to gain back some elasticity. Does this make sense to any of you GB cleansing people who've done this through the years? It does me. What if when we're doing the cleansing too much, too often, that we stretch out our bile ducts too much. Dale, you might know about this. I'm just asking and bringing forth a point. Like I said, my two friends are still doing this after 10 years, so they must realize something. One of them said: No one has to have their GB removed, ever (that is, of course, they catch it early enough.) Not everyone can. And maybe in Dawn's or Barry's case something inside of them could have also been genetic in cause. I do realize that. In Dawn's case, she wasn't able to eat hardly anything at all, even just veggies, which is a strange situation to me and demands some other explanation. Wasn't Dawn losing weight? Shoot, in my situation, I'm still stuck on this overweight whale size. Something is weird. BTW, I'm going to be tested for hypothyroidsim, which can prevent you from losing weight and cause many health-related problems. Maybe Dawn has/had a GB genetic problem. It's possible. Please respond when you can. Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2002 Report Share Posted August 5, 2002 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. Then I started thinking, maybe the time in between cleanses allows our bile ducts to gain back some elasticity. Does this make sense to any of you GB cleansing people who've done this through the years? It does me. What if when we're doing the cleansing too much, too often, that we stretch out our bile ducts too much. Dale, you might know about this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Susie; I was told that I too had enlarged bile ducts when they did an ultrasound of my liver and gallbladder back in October of '99'. I haven't had another ultrasound since then but I'm sure that things have surely settled regarding the size of mine. However, I do still have to watch what I do eat but havent' been as good about that as I know I should. But, I sure don't go out to eat hydrogenated or saturated fats contained in the foods I order at resturants. Dale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2002 Report Share Posted August 5, 2002 > Why must I do this if I feel fine? I know that we're supposed to get > everything out of us that we can. Susie, My opinion for what it is worth now that I am gallbladderless is that if you did a cleanse in Feb and if you are having NO problems, and if your diet is good, and if you are taking some good supplements, then you would only NEED to do maintenance cleanses a couple of times a year to maybe quarterly like Dr. Shulze says. > So then I thought about Dawn when she just had the surgery and about what she > remembered the surgeon said, Your bile ducts are too enlarged. Sorry, don't > remember the exact words that she used. The surgeon seemed concerned about my enlarged duct because he thought there might be a stone stuck. He also seemed to think that the enlargement would be permanent. BUT, it may be genetic for me as those ducts were pictured enlarged BEFORE I ever did one cleanse. But, I hardly ever believe doctors and so I do think it is possible for them to go back down, but have nothing to back that thought up. > > One of them said: No one has to have their GB removed, ever (that is, of > course, they catch it early enough.) Catching it early, which I thought I did, is the key but sometimes not enough I guess. Wasn't Dawn losing weight? Shoot, in my > situation, I'm still stuck on this overweight whale size. Something is > weird. I lost 35 pounds but had previously been unable to. I think the liver cleansing helped. I have thought, but cannot back up with tests that I am hypothyroid based on temperature, blood pressure, and pulse testing. I also have been diagnosed with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and have adrenal weakness. But, all that I have done for my gb has helped improve much of that. BTW, I'm going to be tested for hypothyroidsim, which can prevent you > from losing weight and cause many health-related problems. Maybe Dawn > has/had a GB genetic problem. It's possible. > > Please respond when you can. > Susie I have wracked my brain about why I have had this problem. I have guessed that losing 30 pounds 4 times, eating a low fat diet all four of those times, and multiple pregnancies, did me in. Maybe genetics too, but noone in my family but one great grandmother ever had a problem. And she was a big lady as I was not. But no female in my family ever had six children either. It has been so hard to read about the successes and even hear of them in people I know. " So and so did one cleanse and never had another problem. " Ugh! Oh well, mine is over and this week, the post surgery test was eating anything and everything that I could not eat previously to total toleration. I have gained back seven pounds and now consider myself at my absolute best ideal weight. I have a follow up with the surgeon on Thurs. And to anyone worried, starting tomorrow I am back to my healthy changes pre-surgery. I will enjoy great health and when there is a social ocassion, I can eat without guilt knowing that on a daily basis I am healthy. Of a personal note, we went on vacation this week and I had a thermographic breast image since my family breast cancer stats are now so bad. I'll get the results in 2 weeks. No smashing, no radiation, no embarassment. Dawn PS. So far, living without a gallbladder has not been traumatic. It has gone much better than I ever hoped though I wish I could have kept it. But hindsight, and having a good surgeon, I might have given in sooner if I had known it would not be so bad. But, I wanted to keep my gb so I did the best I could. I hope everyone success. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2002 Report Share Posted August 5, 2002 I lost 35 pounds but had previously been unable to. I think the liver cleansing helped. I have thought, but cannot back up with tests that I am hypothyroid based on temperature, blood pressure, and pulse testing. I also have been diagnosed with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and have adrenal weakness. But, all that I have done for my gb has helped improve much of that. Dawn, Thanks for your response. You know, Dr. Cabot talks about Syndrome X, so maybe that's what I have. I may have to find out more about it, but you can't lose weight. About hypothyroidism, there can be subclinical and it can cause the same symptoms. Again, I'm trying to learn more about that. I've ordered an at-home test from eBioSafe labs. You send it back to them after giving a couple drops of blood and they get a doc to analyze the lab results and send you the results. It's pretty neat! Well, I may try a cleanse soon anyway. I'm just feeling fine, which makes it hard to get in the mood. Also, you're saying that your bile ducts were enlarged before? That's interesting. Maybe yours are just that way. Thanks, Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2002 Report Share Posted August 7, 2002 That's right. Either it was abnormally large to begin with or I had just passed a stone since the first ultrasound was taken in the ER during an attack. Dawn > > Also, you're saying that your bile ducts were enlarged before? That's > interesting. Maybe yours are just that way. > Thanks, > Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 8, 2002 Report Share Posted August 8, 2002 At or about 20:29, 07/08/02 (my clock), azdmarie made the following statement: =========Start of Material Being Replied to======== >That's right. Either it was abnormally large to begin with or I had >just passed a stone since the first ultrasound was taken in the ER >during an attack. Dawn >>>>>>>>>>>==End of Quoted Material==<<<<<<<<<<< Didn't you have previous ultrasound imaging with which to compare the size of your bile ducts? That way you would know if they had just suddenly become enlarged or that had been the static situation all along. --------------------------- IRA L. JACOBSON --------------------------- mailto:laser@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 9, 2002 Report Share Posted August 9, 2002 I had 2 ultrasounds, one at the beginning, after about the 4th attack. The other at the end, 6 months later, 3 days before surgery. Why would anyone have an ultrasound of their bile ducts, gallbladder, etc, if they weren't having any problems? Dawn > > Didn't you have previous ultrasound imaging with which to compare the > size of your bile ducts? That way you would know if they had just > suddenly become enlarged or that had been the static situation all along. > > --------------------------- > IRA L. JACOBSON > --------------------------- > mailto:laser@i... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2002 Report Share Posted August 11, 2002 At or about 20:45, 09/08/02 (my clock), azdmarie made the following statement: =========Start of Material Being Replied to======== >I had 2 ultrasounds, one at the beginning, after about the 4th >attack. The other at the end, 6 months later, 3 days before surgery. >Why would anyone have an ultrasound of their bile ducts, gallbladder, >etc, if they weren't having any problems? Dawn > > > > Didn't you have previous ultrasound imaging with which to compare >the > > size of your bile ducts? That way you would know if they had just > > suddenly become enlarged or that had been the static situation all >along. >>>>>>>>>>>==End of Quoted Material==<<<<<<<<<<< My question related to your surprise at the dialed bile ducts. I asked if they had been so also in previous " ultrasounds " ? If not, then you would have looked for the cause. But if they had, then you would know that the flushes probably did not cause the condition. As I stated in my question. So which was it? --------------------------- IRA L. JACOBSON --------------------------- mailto:laser@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2002 Report Share Posted August 12, 2002 Actually my bile duct was DI-LATED. And I was only slightly surprised that they started out that way ACCORDING TO THE FIRST ULTRASOUND IN THE ER!!! That's the way, girl, spell it out for him. That's what it takes! Susie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2002 Report Share Posted August 12, 2002 Actually my bile duct was DI-LATED. And I was only slightly surprised that they started out that way ACCORDING TO THE FIRST ULTRASOUND IN THE ER!!! This because the Dr thought that the enlargement came from cleansing, which it did not. They started out that way according to that ultrasound. I think you are the only one still with questions about this. However, they may have been normal prior to Christmas before I had any ultrasounds. But, since I thought I was in good health at the time, I did not have an ultrasound then. Any more questions? Come on Ira I am sure you can come up with a dozen more. And no I did not notice what type of ultrasound machine it was, whether the technician had a high IQ or whether it had recently been inspected to see if it was working properly. Dawn > > My question related to your surprise at the dialed bile ducts. I asked > if they had been so also in previous " ultrasounds " ? > > If not, then you would have looked for the cause. But if they had, then > you would know that the flushes probably did not cause the condition. > > As I stated in my question. > > So which was it? > > --------------------------- > IRA L. JACOBSON > --------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.