Guest guest Posted July 31, 2002 Report Share Posted July 31, 2002 ------------------------------------------------ On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:56:42 -0500, bobhurt@... wrote: ------------------------------------------------ On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:02:21 -0500, " /Tom Roper " <tar00@...> wrote: Do you get Ralph Moss's newsletter? It's free, I assume. He's a clear writer like you. Even today, we find huge disparities in the incidence of cancer worldwide, with increased rates seemingly tied to the adoption of a refined diet and other harmful habits. Hungary, for instance, has a cancer death rate of 272.2 per 100,000 (men) and 138.4 per 100,000 (women). Contrast this with Mexico, where the death rate among men is 85.0 and among women 78.9 per 100,000. Certainly tobacco has been a major culprit in dramatic rise of cancer in the last century. Hungary has the highest rate of lung cancer in the world. I have visited that country four times and always came away shocked at the amount of smoking. On one trip I visited a number of famous medical facilities and never did my hosts fail to offer me cigarettes. When I met with one of the country's highest ranking scientists, he nonchalantly chain-smoked throughout the entire meeting. After the fall of Communism, downtown Budapest became plastered with ads for American cigarettes. Philip , makers of Marlboro, sponsored televised rock concerts and young women in Marlboro suits dispensed free samples of Marlboro cigarettes. Concertgoers who agreed to smoke the cigarettes received a complimentary pair of " designer Marlboro sunglasses. " There is no doubt that smoking has played a role in the rising rates of cancer. However, an overwhelming body of evidence points to.... And it goes on. Cancer -- everyone talks about it and no one can do anything about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2002 Report Share Posted July 31, 2002 ------------------------------------------------ On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:56:42 -0500, bobhurt@... wrote: ------------------------------------------------ On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:02:21 -0500, " /Tom Roper " <tar00@...> wrote: Do you get Ralph Moss's newsletter? It's free, I assume. He's a clear writer like you. Even today, we find huge disparities in the incidence of cancer worldwide, with increased rates seemingly tied to the adoption of a refined diet and other harmful habits. Hungary, for instance, has a cancer death rate of 272.2 per 100,000 (men) and 138.4 per 100,000 (women). Contrast this with Mexico, where the death rate among men is 85.0 and among women 78.9 per 100,000. Certainly tobacco has been a major culprit in dramatic rise of cancer in the last century. Hungary has the highest rate of lung cancer in the world. I have visited that country four times and always came away shocked at the amount of smoking. On one trip I visited a number of famous medical facilities and never did my hosts fail to offer me cigarettes. When I met with one of the country's highest ranking scientists, he nonchalantly chain-smoked throughout the entire meeting. After the fall of Communism, downtown Budapest became plastered with ads for American cigarettes. Philip , makers of Marlboro, sponsored televised rock concerts and young women in Marlboro suits dispensed free samples of Marlboro cigarettes. Concertgoers who agreed to smoke the cigarettes received a complimentary pair of " designer Marlboro sunglasses. " There is no doubt that smoking has played a role in the rising rates of cancer. However, an overwhelming body of evidence points to.... And it goes on. Cancer -- everyone talks about it and no one can do anything about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 Just Curious.....Has anyone ever received one of the Moss Reports directly related to their cancer? It seems his name pops up everywhere. I know when I flip through all the particular cancers that he reports on there is not a category for the cancer I have. Seems like places I have read about cancer people have used his input as referenced. Pam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2008 Report Share Posted February 25, 2008 If I remember correctly, my ND studied with Ralph Moss, but I don't remember the details. I have skimmed over some of the reports, but haven't spent the time to actually study them. ar -- Arlyn Grant arlynsg@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2008 Report Share Posted February 25, 2008 > > If I remember correctly, my ND studied with Ralph Moss, but I don't > remember the details. I have skimmed over some of the reports, but > haven't spent the time to actually study them. > > ar > You have to pay $300 to get one of his reports ... the newsletters are free, but you would definitely know if you had one of his reports as you'd be $300 poorer! LOL xxoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2008 Report Share Posted February 25, 2008 Moss is not an M.D. and that means nothing because many researchers providing much of the information doctors use are not M.D.s. Moss was a Science writer at Sloan Kettering and his specialty is not research on particular protocols but simply gathering as much information as he can and putting into a form people might be able to understand. Considering that M.D.s don't have the answers either, they are the last people I want to get my information from. I suspect that with stage IV Invasive Lobular Cancer there might not be a lot of things to put one's 'stamp of approval' on. Can you imagine what would happen if he recommended a particular protocol that was not 'approved' and poor results came about? Many on this list have come to the conclusion that much, if not most, of the information Moss provides can be had by doing our own research. I think it important that you were able to get your money back and also that it is obvious that Moss cannot actually recommend treatment. I find/found his weekly information letter very informative and have yet to find anything negative to say about it. I did not buy his report on Bladder Cancer because of the cost and because have the time to search myself. For people that do not have the time, or the inclination, they need to be in touch with those that are informed. Perhaps you might have asked others whether or not they were satisfied with the Moss Report on their own cancers or, at least, contact someone such as , our resident expert on what works and what doesn't. Joe C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2008 Report Share Posted February 25, 2008 I have found his information very useful. For anyone trying to get up to speed quickly his reports are very worthwhile. For a newly diagnosed cancer patient who has never given cancer a thought before-getting up to speed on all the options is a challenge to say the least JCastron <jcastron1@...> wrote: Moss is not an M.D. and that means nothing because many researchers providing much of the information doctors use are not M.D.s. Moss was a Science writer at Sloan Kettering and his specialty is not research on particular protocols but simply gathering as much information as he can and putting into a form people might be able to understand. Considering that M.D.s don't have the answers either, they are the last people I want to get my information from. I suspect that with stage IV Invasive Lobular Cancer there might not be a lot of things to put one's 'stamp of approval' on. Can you imagine what would happen if he recommended a particular protocol that was not 'approved' and poor results came about? Many on this list have come to the conclusion that much, if not most, of the information Moss provides can be had by doing our own research. I think it important that you were able to get your money back and also that it is obvious that Moss cannot actually recommend treatment. I find/found his weekly information letter very informative and have yet to find anything negative to say about it. I did not buy his report on Bladder Cancer because of the cost and because have the time to search myself. For people that do not have the time, or the inclination, they need to be in touch with those that are informed. Perhaps you might have asked others whether or not they were satisfied with the Moss Report on their own cancers or, at least, contact someone such as , our resident expert on what works and what doesn't. Joe C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2008 Report Share Posted February 25, 2008 , So true! It's just the newsletters I must have looked at. ar On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:57:43 -0000, " " <melissabuhmeyer@...> said: > > > > > If I remember correctly, my ND studied with Ralph Moss, but I don't > > remember the details. I have skimmed over some of the reports, but > > haven't spent the time to actually study them. > > > > ar > > > You have to pay $300 to get one of his reports ... the newsletters are > free, but you would > definitely know if you had one of his reports as you'd be $300 poorer! > LOL > > xxoo > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 25, 2008 Report Share Posted February 25, 2008 I suspect that with stage IV Invasive Lobular Cancer there might not be a lot of things to put one's 'stamp of approval' on. Can you imagine what would happen if he recommended a particular protocol that was not 'approved' and poor results came about?.... > Yes, I'm glad I got a refund ... that was nice, but I really expected to get more specific info about treatments for Stage IV Lobular, which I did not. Guess I just expected it to be tailored to that particular title ... not a hodge podge of different stuff. I do enjoy his newsletter .. xxoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.