Guest guest Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 We continually bring up questions that are simply answered. Biopsies spread cancer cells and if we now add Viruses, now we know, they too may be spread. What must not be missed is the word 'present' when saying, The " Virus is present " and that is why some diseases are named. They find a virus and name the illness as caused by the virus and if not found, a different name is given it. Many illnesses have exactly the same symptoms and why? Why wouldn't they since certain parts of the body are involved and if as some believe, the symptoms are nothing more than the body defending itself, then it makes sense for similar symptoms when in reality it is one illness............the body riding itself of various toxins. Doing its best to survive. When I declined a 'mapping biopsy' of my bladder and of my prostate because of the potential of spreading cancer cells, the Urologist agreed but tried to get me to allow it because, as he said, " I take precautions by using a lot of water to wash away cells " . ?? Thanks but no thanks. Someday it will be agreed that since Viruses/Bacteria are omnipresent, around us all the time, perhaps it is as Pasteur was supposed to have said, " it is the environment " which would mean it is the body not the germ with that germ being only secondary at most. There is no virus that when present always causes illness or a reaction and since that is the case, it cannot be blamed for the illness. It's the environment. It might be strongly contributory, but it cannot be 'THE' cause. I quoted Pasteur but cannot prove he actually said it was the environment. Joe C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 Pasteur may have said that in his last years, but it was another researcher from whom he " stole " the germs idea who came up with it. Rife also said it years later, that by changing the body's pH levels, he could bring about disease. I actually think both ideas are correct, that the healthy body can fight off almost anything, but for most of us, exposure to the bad stuff (germs, virii) can bring about a case of that particular disease... -Dave JCastron1 wrote: > We continually bring up questions that are simply answered. Biopsies spread cancer cells and if we now add Viruses, now we know, they too may be spread. > > What must not be missed is the word 'present' when saying, The " Virus is present " and that is why some diseases are named. They find a virus and name the illness as caused by the virus and if not found, a different name is given it. > > Many illnesses have exactly the same symptoms and why? Why wouldn't they since certain parts of the body are involved and if as some believe, the symptoms are nothing more than the body defending itself, then it makes sense for similar symptoms when in reality it is one illness............the body riding itself of various toxins. Doing its best to survive. > > When I declined a 'mapping biopsy' of my bladder and of my prostate because of the potential of spreading cancer cells, the Urologist agreed but tried to get me to allow it because, as he said, " I take precautions by using a lot of water to wash away cells " . ?? Thanks but no thanks. > > Someday it will be agreed that since Viruses/Bacteria are omnipresent, around us all the time, perhaps it is as Pasteur was supposed to have said, " it is the environment " which would mean it is the body not the germ with that germ being only secondary at most. There is no virus that when present always causes illness or a reaction and since that is the case, it cannot be blamed for the illness. It's the environment. It might be strongly contributory, but it cannot be 'THE' cause. I quoted Pasteur but cannot prove he actually said it was the environment. > > Joe C. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 I think while this is true, also it is important to get Vit D levels checked. Zinc should be added, and Bromine Laced foods avoided. Food manufacturers are loading up on the cheap corn sweetener HFCS, and this is killing us. Look at Mercola.com for Vitamin D and Iodine. Iodine has been replaced with bromine, like in chlorine, florine, etc. I have attached a slide show. Look at how the food industry is screwing us! [Moderator's note: The computer systems do not include the capacity to attach anything to a message. Include a link to another site if possible.] > We continually bring up questions that are simply answered. Biopsies spread cancer cells and if we now add Viruses, now we know, they too may be spread. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2009 Report Share Posted September 24, 2009 Interesting! BK virus seems implicated in this . Study : BK Virus as a Cofactor in the Etiology of Prostate Cancer in Its Early Stage ================= A survey of 400 healthy blood donors was reported as showing that 82% were positive for BK virus. Study : ^ Egli A, Infanti L, Dumoulin A, et al. (2009). " Prevalence of polyomavirus BK and JC infection and replication in 400 healthy blood donors " . J Infect Dis 199 (6): 837–846. ================ the National Academy of Sciences think prostate cancer http://www.cancer.gov/cancerinfo/types/prostate may be related to a virus <http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/alllife/virus.html>. Scientists at Columbia University and the University of Utah have determined that a virus that's already known to cause certain other cancers in animals is present in human prostate cancer cells. " Which begs the question - does a needle biopsy of any cancer tumor spread the virus? The medical community has been telling us for years that cancer is not a virus, although it is known for certain that some cancers ARE indeed virus linked.... Interesting! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2009 Report Share Posted September 24, 2009 We already know that biopsy can spread cancer cells so that's enough for me. Why would I want the risk of that knowing that if it does, the problem can be worse than cancer existing before the biopsy but unknown. You've heard the following from me before: Do you know the percentage of people getting Metastasis from a biopsy? The answer: 100%..........for the unlucky person that it happens to. A play on words of course but strong enough considering that many prostate cancers are a 'watchful waiting' situation. As always, this is a decision each person needs to make themselves just as the ultimate decision as to what course to take when cancer is discovered. Joe C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.