Guest guest Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 the trouble with the simoncini protocol for bladder cancer is, it sounds simple to do , but no one knows the exact protocol..dosage, etc...Sure would like to be able to do it locally, at a local holistic docs office, but Dr s is hard to get a hol dof From: m.shall Oncotype DX and Simoncini method. You can find it here: http://www.luminific.com/health_news/ And another one Simoncini method. http://www.luminific.com/health_news/cancer-therapy-news/ Blessings, Mariya Shall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Hello , I'm new here to the group, so I don't know your cancer situation but for what it's worth, drinking a 5% solution of baking soda twice daily can work on bladder cancer, however the stronger direct route is to use a catheter with the 5% solution also for the first 7 days and continue drinking until tests show the cancer is gone (usually 1- 2 months. There is no exact time involved only estimates because every cancer and every body is different. You just have to do what it takes for each situation. Most nurses can teach you how to catheterize yourself and you should be able to buy the catheters from a home health care pharmacy. A 5% solution of baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) is made by mixing 2 teaspoons of baking soda in 8 ounces of pure RO water. With the catheter, start by voiding your bladder use a 60cc syringe of the 5% baking soda solution and infuse slowly. Remove the catheter and hold your bladder for as long as possible. Lay down and rotate from front, side, back, side and back to front every 10 minutes when the solution is in your bladder. It may burn because of the cancer and because of the acid environment normally in the bladder, but it will not harm you. FYI for everyone, this 5% solution is very effective orally and in the colon using enemas if you can get the solution directly to the cancer and it has not spread to lymph or deeper tissues. Hope this helps, Hope " VINCENT TOKATLIAN " <vttttt@...> wrote: > > the trouble with the simoncini protocol for bladder cancer is, it sounds simple to do , but no one knows the exact protocol..dosage, etc...Sure would like to be able to do it locally, at a local holistic docs office, but Dr s is hard to get a hol dof > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 How much to drink per day? i.e, is that a teaspoon in a glass of water 2 times a day? thats what others have suggested.. BTW, where did you get all this info? i talked briefly with Dr S and he made it sound like BCG as far as the protocol. From: absprofessor Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 12:50 AM Hello , I'm new here to the group, so I don't know your cancer situation but for what it's worth, drinking a 5% solution of baking soda twice daily can work on bladder cancer, however the stronger direct route is to use a catheter with the 5% solution also for the first 7 days and continue drinking until tests show the cancer is gone (usually 1- 2 months. There is no exact time involved only estimates because every cancer and every body is different. You just have to do what it takes for each situation. Most nurses can teach you how to catheterize yourself and you should be able to buy the catheters from a home health care pharmacy. A 5% solution of baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) is made by mixing 2 teaspoons of baking soda in 8 ounces of pure RO water. With the catheter, start by voiding your bladder use a 60cc syringe of the 5% baking soda solution and infuse slowly. Remove the catheter and hold your bladder for as long as possible. Lay down and rotate from front, side, back, side and back to front every 10 minutes when the solution is in your bladder. It may burn because of the cancer and because of the acid environment normally in the bladder, but it will not harm you. FYI for everyone, this 5% solution is very effective orally and in the colon using enemas if you can get the solution directly to the cancer and it has not spread to lymph or deeper tissues. Hope this helps, Hope Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 I would like to hear from someone that 'knows' whether or not drinking Bicarbonate of Soda can enter the bladder as pure Bicarbonate of Soda? Isn't it passing through the digestive system after the alimentary canal and subject to varying acids or other elements that might change its properties? I can understand the reasoning, though not whether or not it is effective, by the direct instillation into the Bladder via a catheter. For my purposes, it is a mute point re self-catheterization because my plumbing is such that the Urologist needs to use his Cystoscope to thread a wire into the bladder for the catheter to snake its way into the bladder. Amazingly, it works and wasn't any worse than the scope itself. Joe C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 Hello , I certainly respect Dr. Simoncini's work because it works and I have seen it work directly on tumors. I have met with Dr. Simoncini too however I believe he will never get his work established in the US or possibly anywhere. That is not because baking soda can't work, but because he simply is not a good messenger or communicates his theory very well to be accepted (rude, arrogant, you fill in the blank). Not accepted with the majority of alternative doctors means you don't have a chance with those in medicine with the power. Some may get upset with this view, but this is what I believe. You have to take what he says with a grain of salt (no pun intended... OK a little intended regarding dosages etc. Also I don't think it will get accepted because there are not millionaire investors that are willing to put up research money to get an FDA approval on something that will never get approved because of financial politics here in the US. If it were to get approved, there would not be a drug produced that would give a return on the investors money " no profit " so there are many reasons. If you do the math calculation with sodium bicarbonate it takes two teaspoons to produce very close to a 5% solution in an 8oz glass of water. Most of Simoncini's protocols use this 5%. I have learned by experience and talking to others that have used it. It would be nice if the small group of people having experience with it could pool their resources, but it has been my experience that everything seems to be too hush hush about it (and possibly for good reason). If you were at the CCS convention you may have heard the prostate cancer patient video testimony that used the sodium bicarbonate IV and had done 7 rounds of it. Following Dr. Simoncini's direction he had seen continued progress with his cancer reducing in size. Dr. Simoncini only gives a basic starting protocol on his web site for certain conditions and you could start with them, but don't think that they are a recipe for a cure. On prostate he says you need to do an artery catheter, and infuse the 5% directly into the prostate, but the bad news is that there is not a single doctor you will find in the US or on this side of the earth that will do it and take that kind of a risk with the high pressure side of your blood circulation. Every situation is different and needs possibly a different protocol. He says brain cancer is very easy, simply stick a needle into your carotid artery in your neck and shoot up with an 8% solution daily. If I had brain cancer I might get desperate enough to try it, with death as my only other option but I doubt you will ever find a doctor or anyone else that is crazy enough to do it on someone else. Maybe that's why Simoncini has had his medical license taken away 12-15 years ago in Italy. Or, maybe because he helped too many people, or maybe because he killed a few. But if it was because of the later, what irony that you don's see MD shut down when a patient dies from too much chemo (I'm sure happens on a daily basis). Some assume that the sodium bicarb works because it simply alkalizes the body, (even alternative doctors), however Simoncini directly says it is not the alkalinity that makes it work. Remember his theory is based upon that cancer is a fungus About your question, I would agree with twice daily, but I would use 2 teaspoons per each glass. I also agree it greatly gets diluted in the body and perhaps not much if any would ever get to the bladder. That said, I am working with a bladder cancer patient who has been doing the drinking of bicarb only for the past 4 months and her scope last month revealed no new tumors in the bladder (she had them removed several times over the past few years). I told her to keep it up and if it works she would not have to worry about the catheter protocol, but if it didn't she may need to consider it. It sounds like it shouldn't work and too simple to work. But, if it works I don't really need to know why, just do it. I know it won't hurt you drinking that amount because that isn't enough to drastically upset your chemistry balance. You have nothing to lose. I spoke to a women today who drank 3 teaspoons in a glass of water and had to stay near the toilet that day last weekend, so if you take too much, your body will just pass it on through. Hope this helps and if anyone here has any experience (not just theory) you would like to share, I'm all ears. Off list email is fine too. Thanks, Hope " VINCENT TOKATLIAN " <vttttt@...> wrote: > How much to drink per day? i.e, is that a teaspoon in a glass of water 2 times a day? thats what others have suggested.. > BTW, where did you get all this info? i talked briefly with Dr S and he made it sound like BCG as far as the protocol. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 Hello Mike & all, Interesting chemistry scenario, I'm no chemist and it sounds like you know a lot more about it than I do, but Dr. Simoncini said that sodium bicarbonate breaks down in the body in the blood stream to form sodium and carbon dioxide. When the carbon dioxide in your blood increases, your body begins to be able to uptake increased levels of oxygen. So if this is true, maybe drinking baking soda or via IV solution simply increases oxygen to the tissues and you are back to simply a unique way to oxygenate the body which is well known to be anticancer (ie ozone, H2O2, etc). Just my thought. Hope Mike Golden wrote: > > Hello Joe, > Sodium and bicarbonate are ionically bonded, the sodium ion being > positively charged and the bicarbonate ion negatively charged. These > bonds are weak and easily broken. Sodium bicarbonate dumped into > water will instantly dissolve due to the polar nature of the water > itself. The two ions stay dissociated in " hydration shells " and > held seperate from one another. If the water evaporates the ionic > bonds reform and you have sodium bicarbonate once again. Mixed with > stomach acid, baking soda creates a belch, which is you blowing off > the carbon dioxide that is released. The bloodstream, being an > aqueous solution carries the two ions seperately. To further > complicte things, the kidneys will recycle or eliminate bicarbonate > according to the needs of the body. This is one of the ways the body > maintains its pH level. The baking soda you drink might result in > the deposition of bicarbonate in the bladder, but it won't be there as > sodium bicarbonate. In addition to that those molecules of > bicarbonate you dump won't entirely be the same ones you drank since > there is always bicarbonate in the system anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2008 Report Share Posted December 17, 2008 thanks.. 1) This bladder ca pt, who had no nw tumors..were her tumors supefiicail? One of mine have ionvaded the muscle, in the last biopsy, and even Dr Lamm ( BCG doc0, emailed his opinion that the bladder should be removed, due to this,a nd the fear of metastasis 2) Whre are you located? i ma near L.A. From: absprofessor Hello , I certainly respect Dr. Simoncini's work because it works and I have seen it work directly on tumors. I have met with Dr. Simoncini too however I believe he will never get his work established in the US or possibly anywhere. That is not because baking soda can't work, but because he simply is not a good messenger or communicates his theory very well to be accepted (rude, arrogant, you fill in the blank). Not accepted with the majority of alternative doctors means you don't have a chance with those in medicine with the power. Some may get upset with this view, but this is what I believe. You have to take what he says with a grain of salt (no pun intended... OK a little intended regarding dosages etc................ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2008 Report Share Posted December 17, 2008 Hello , Yes, the tumors were superficial. The sodium bicarb rule is it has a good chance of being effective if it has not gone through the wall. If so, a much more aggressive approach is needed... IV 5% sodium bicarb as a mets preventative, catheter the bladder and direct infusion into the abdomen to reach the outside of the bladder. You never know if going directly into the bladder with the sodium bicarb can be effective enough to knock it out if in the wall, but unlikely if gone through the wall without the other two ways to reach it. Drinking can be done, but if it were me I would do the catheter ASAP. The point is you have nothing to lose as it does no harm, only can start to kill, slow or even stop the growth. I always do the conservative approach first (if time is available) to see if it can work or at least help to some degree. Follow up testing to monitor the situation is essential to know if you are killing it. With breast cancer I have seen the tumor killed and shrink to 1/2 size to were the woman was able to have the lump removed and was able to avoid a full mastectomy with lymph nodes, chemo, and radiation (more than once). This is a huge benefit. No harm was done to the immune system by using the sodium bicarb and the breast was saved. I am not anywhere close to L.A. sorry. For privacy, I really don't want to say where I am. Many people hate this information getting out. I spoke with a doctor in Alabama yesterday and he said that Dr. Simoncini was arrested in the past 3 months and the clinic he was working through in Rome was shut down (I don't have any facts to back this up, but I wouldn't doubt it). FYI, Simoncini has not been medically licensed in Italy for the past 12-15 years, so what he has been doing has been just working through licensed doctors that have taken the risk of doing his work. I however am not one of them; I just know what has been going on. I of course can not tell you what to do, but if you have even a few weeks to do something, I would try it. That said, mets is nothing to fool with. I worked with one bladder cancer patient that would not do anything about his cancer except some off the wall superficial alternative multilevel scam that basically promised results and his cancer spread all over his body and he died less than a year from diagnosis. I believe each person needs to be informed and look at all options and then after quite contemplation and reflection, make a decision to move forward with one or more approaches that are synergistic that he has peace with. NEVER, EVER MAKE A DECISION OUT OF FEAR. One direction will give you more peace than the other. Remember timing is also significant. Surgery may not be right at this time, but in a few weeks, or months maybe it could be the right thing to do. You have to tap into what your core " spirit " is telling you. Sincerely, Hope " VINCENT T wrote: > 1) This bladder ca pt, who had no nw tumors..were her tumors supefiicail? > One of mine have ionvaded the muscle, in the last biopsy, and even Dr Lamm ( BCG doc0, emailed his opinion that the bladder should be removed, due to this,a nd the fear of metastasis > 2) Whre are you located? i ma near L.A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.