feedback about The Beautiful Truth movie...

[Guest guest]

For anyone who's seen the documentary... y'know that scene where they do the

energy radiating photography on veggies and fruits? It just occurred to me

recently... had anyone considered the FRESHNESS of the produce that was

taken in the photography?? I suspect that the freshness of the produce has

a HUGE impact on whether you see the energy radiating from the produce in

the pix or not... and less likely to do with the fact it's organic or not.

while i'm a big fan of organic, I only question the slant some of these

types of " documentaries " have when putting out a documentary with a hidden

agenda. either side has to be watched with a critical eye and not to take

things for granted what each side is accurate OR necessarily the full fact

under the right context!

the recent controversy over whether organic is truly more nutritious than

conventional produce got me thinking. just by plain observation.. assuming

the seeds of produce are not GMO... shouldn't one be able get a clue the

health of a fruit/veggie by the external characteristics - appearance to

feel to smell, etc? afterall, how can produce have similar outward

characteristics from another if it's " not as healthy " b/c of " fake

nutrients " from the process of man-made science? of course, i haven't

looked into any research to back this observation... but some independent

thinking made me wonder. granted, we CAN measure nutritional content of

what we can measure... and apparently, that's what these 160+ science papers

did in coming to a consensus that organics have not been shown to be more

nutritionally superior to conventional produce.

for example, a tomato of the same type... if a conventional tomatoe looks as

deep red as an organic... as plump... as .. . " vivacious " and as fragrant (or

even more so)... can't we come to a common sense assumption that the

conventional tomatos is prolly just as nutritious as the organic tomato?

afterall... it's not a GMO seed. just as we are what we eat... and symptoms

can manifest from the wrong /malnutritious nutrients or deficient quantities

in our bodies...so can it be seen for produce.

HOWEVER, that said, independent thinking would lead to believe that a more

nutritious soil source (organic) free of contaminants and chemicals and

other man-made elements in the soil would produce/sustain a more healthy

produce than conventional soil. the article did no take into account

pesticides and other toxins... AND our current technology can only track

known elements in produce... there's so much more to understand from nature

about the intricate details of enzymes, antioxidants, and who knows what

other or how many nutrients in produce!

btw, just looked up the recent controversy and found it here:

http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_18702.cfm

--

to your optimal health, wealth, and happiness,

Kelvin