Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

FDA Defeated in Federal Court over Truthful Health Claims

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Great!

In a message dated 6/7/2010 10:46:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,

robert-blau@... writes:

FDA Defeated in Federal Court over Truthful Health Claims

www.myhealthytown.com

(NaturalNews) Health freedom has just been handed a significant victory

by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which

ruled last week that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

violated the First Amendment rights of a nutritional supplement company

when it censored truthful, scientifically-backed claims about how

selenium can help reduce the risk of cancer.

See the ANH announcement at:

_http://www.anh-usa.org/court-finds-for-anh-usa-in-stunning-victory-over-fda

-thank-you-jonathan-emord/_

(http://www.anh-usa.org/court-finds-for-anh-usa-in-stunning-victory-over-fda-tha\

nk-you-jonathan-emord/)

Essentially, the FDA applied its doctrine of censorship to these

selenium supplements in the same way it oppresses truthful and

scientifically-supported health claims across all dietary supplements.

The purpose of the FDA's censorship of truthful information about the

health benefits of dietary supplements, as NaturalNews readers already

know, is to keep the American people nutritionally illiterate and

protect the profits of the pharmaceutical industry.

In this court case, ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH, et al. vs. KATHLEEN

SEBELIUS, et al., the judge ruled that the FDA violated the First

Amendment rights of the plaintiffs by restricting their free speech

about the anti-cancer benefits of their selenium supplements.

As explained by health freedom attorney Emord who argued the

case before the Court:

" The decision... reaffirms that FDA is subject to the strictures of the

First Amendment in its evaluation of health claims and it faults FDA for

failing to follow that standard, holding its suppression of the

selenium-cancer risk reduction claims unconstitutional. "

Emord goes onto explain:

" The Court concludes that the FDA... has not provided any empirical

evidence, such as 'studies' or 'anecdotal evidence,' that consumers

would be misled by... plaintiffs' claims were they accompanied by

qualifications. Moreover, the explanation the FDA offers to demonstrate

that plaintiffs' claims are misleading , that the claims leave out

pertinent information , is not support for banning the claims

entirely... "

Attorney Emord from Emord and Associates is widely regarded as

one of the most successful and influential attorneys battling the FDA

over free speech and health freedoms.

View my video interview with Emord here:

_

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

FDA Defeated in Federal Court over Truthful Health Claims

 

www.myhealthytown.com

 

(NaturalNews) Health freedom has just been handed a significant victory

by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which

ruled last week that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

violated the First Amendment rights of a nutritional supplement company

when it censored truthful, scientifically-backed claims about how

selenium can help reduce the risk of cancer.

See the ANH announcement at:

http://www.anh-usa.org/court-finds-for-anh-usa-in-stunning-victory-over-fda-than\

k-you-jonathan-emord/

Essentially, the FDA applied its doctrine of censorship to these

selenium supplements in the same way it oppresses truthful and

scientifically-supported health claims across all dietary supplements.

The purpose of the FDA's censorship of truthful information about the

health benefits of dietary supplements, as NaturalNews readers already

know, is to keep the American people nutritionally illiterate and

protect the profits of the pharmaceutical industry.

In this court case, ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH, et al. vs. KATHLEEN

SEBELIUS, et al., the judge ruled that the FDA violated the First

Amendment rights of the plaintiffs by restricting their free speech

about the anti-cancer benefits of their selenium supplements.

As explained by health freedom attorney Emord who argued the

case before the Court:

" The decision... reaffirms that FDA is subject to the strictures of the

First Amendment in its evaluation of health claims and it faults FDA for

failing to follow that standard, holding its suppression of the

selenium-cancer risk reduction claims unconstitutional. "

Emord goes onto explain:

" The Court concludes that the FDA... has not provided any empirical

evidence, such as 'studies' or 'anecdotal evidence,' that consumers

would be misled by... plaintiffs' claims were they accompanied by

qualifications. Moreover, the explanation the FDA offers to demonstrate

that plaintiffs' claims are misleading , that the claims leave out

pertinent information , is not support for banning the claims

entirely... "

Attorney Emord from Emord and Associates is widely regarded as

one of the most successful and influential attorneys battling the FDA

over free speech and health freedoms.

View my video interview with Emord here:

(The video quality is poor, but it's the best we could capture at the

Health Freedom Expo.)

Emord is also the author of a hugely important book that I strongly

recommend. It's called Global Censorship of Health Information, and you

can find it here:

http://www.amazon.com/Global-Censorship-Health-Information-/dp/098205953\

1

What it means for health freedom

The upshot of this decision is that the FDA has just been handed a

significant defeat that will set a precedent for other dietary

supplement companies to make their own truthful,

scientifically-supported health claims.

The FDA, of course, recognizes no law other than its own, so it will

likely continue to try to terrorize nutritional supplement companies

with its usual threats of imprisonment of company founders and seizure

of products unless companies voluntarily agree to comply with the FDA's

censorship schemes. However, this court decision may finally turn the

tide against the FDA's campaign of ignorance that has, for decades,

sought to keep the American people nutritionally illiterate while

suppressing the dietary supplements industry.

Btu achieving a lasting victory over the FDA will require nutritional

supplement companies to stop being intimidated by the FDA and start

making truthful, scientifically-supported claims -- and then stand

behind those claims with a commitment to sue the FDA if they are

threatened with censorship. Until now, most nutritional supplement and

vitamin companies have been so intimidated by the FDA that they dared

not challenge the FDA's authority -- even when they knew the FDA was

flat-out wrong!

The FDA, you see, can always threaten a company using " terrorism-style "

tactics such as sending threatening letters that promise to arrest the

owners, imprison them, destroy their business, seize their customer

records, confiscate their inventory, etc. These tactics have all been

used by the FDA to threaten health product companies operating in the

United States. See how the FDA runs its own criminal extortion racket

right here:

http://www.naturalnews.com/024567_health_the_FDA_websites.html

Read about how the FDA kidnaps people from other countries in order to

incarcerate them for their non-crimes in the USA:

http://www.naturalnews.com/027750_Greg_Caton_FDA.html

Or view more articles about the FDA here:

http://www.naturalnews.com/the_FDA.html

These Gestapo-style FDA tactics have been frighteningly effective, given

that most U.S. companies don't have the financial resources to engage in

a lengthy legal battle with the FDA in order to stand up for their First

Amendment rights. That's why this victory by the Alliance for Natural

Health is so important: It provides a legal wedge by which other

companies can now begin to stand up for their own First Amendment

rights, too.

This could be the beginning of the end of FDA censorship of truthful,

scientifically-supported health claims.

What we want: Free Speech, not fraudulent speech

As the editor of NaturalNews, I want to be perfectly clear what we stand

for here. I do not support a Wild West approach to free speech about

supplements where any company can claim anything they want whether it's

true or not. That can get entirely out of hand, and it would only

encourage the kind of marketing fraud we now see rampant in the

pharmaceutical industry.

What I support is truthful health claims that can be backed by a minimum

of three articles published in peer-reviewed science journals. This

threshold of scientifically credibility is high enough to avoid outright

fraudulent quack claims while still allowing truthful claims to be

reasonably met through scientific inquiry. If such a rule were adopted,

it would open the industry to making a wealth of truthful claims about

the beneficial effects of foods, herbs and supplements.

The FDA's current oppression of health claims about cherries and

walnuts, for example, would cease. Both the FDA and FTC have been

attempting to suppress the truth about cherries for many years,

intimidating cherry product companies with all sorts of threats to try

to force them to remove any links to scientific information about the

health benefits of cherries. To learn more, see:

http://www.naturalnews.com/019366.html

The federal government has also declared war on truthful speech about

the health benefits of walnuts. Read more here:

http://www.naturalnews.com/028879_censorship_healing_foods.html

Why Free Speech can save America from sick-care bankruptcy

Most U.S. consumers have no idea that the FDA is operating as a rogue

agency, attempting to destroy nutritional knowledge and intentionally

keep consumers in the dark about the health benefits of natural

products.

Given that our nation's sick-care system is driving us all into

bankruptcy, it would seem more important than ever to allow consumers to

learn how to prevent disease and improve their own health through safe,

natural and low-cost therapies involving healing foods and nutritional

supplements.

In fact, I would argue that any nation that expects to have a viable

economic future MUST protect free speech for its health products

companies. If Big Pharma and the disease industry is allowed to

monopolize all health knowledge while oppressing truthful health claims

on competing products, it will only drive that nation into medical

bankruptcy. Coincidentally, that is exactly where America is today:

Living under an oppressive, monopolized sick-care system that attempts

to criminalize truthful speech about the health benefits of natural

products. See my CounterThink Cartoon entitled, The New Mr. America:

http://www.counterthink.com/The_New_Mr_America.asp

And yet natural products are the solution to America's health care

problems! Read my special report: Nutrition Can Save America! right here

(it's free):

http://www.naturalnews.com/028879_censorship_healing_foods.html

There's no question about it: America will be happier, healthier,

stronger and more financially solvent if we end FDA censorship and take

steps to protect the First Amendment rights of nutritional supplement

companies.

NaturalNews will continue to work alongside the Alliance for Natural

Health to help make this dream a reality. You can learn more about the

ANH at http://www.anh-usa.org

The European branch of this organization is found at

http://www.anh-europe.org

Please consider supporting the ANH. It is, in my opinion, one of the

most important and effective health freedom organizations on the planet.

They are doing fantastic work and they need your financial support to

continue fighting (and winning!) these battles against FDA ignorance,

tyranny, censorship and oppression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...