Re: baking soda.

[Guest guest]

Make sure you use a baking soda that is aluminum free. Arm And Hammer is not.

Buy it at a health food store and ask for aluminum free.

 

Dennis

How much to drink per day? i.e, is that a teaspoon in a glass of water 2 times a

day? thats what others have suggested..

BTW, where did you get all this info? i talked briefly with Dr S and he made it

sound like BCG as far as the protocol.

From: absprofessor

Hello ,

I'm new here to the group, so I don't know your cancer situation but

for what it's worth, drinking a 5% solution of baking soda twice

daily can work on bladder cancer, however the stronger direct route

is to use a catheter with the 5% solution also for the first 7 days

and continue drinking until tests show the cancer is gone (usually 1-

2 months. There is no exact time involved only estimates because

every cancer and every body is different. You just have to do what

it takes for each situation.

Most nurses can teach you how to catheterize yourself and you should

be able to buy the catheters from a home health care pharmacy. A 5%

solution of baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) is made by mixing 2

teaspoons of baking soda in 8 ounces of pure RO water. With the

catheter, start by voiding your bladder use a 60cc syringe of the 5%

baking soda solution and infuse slowly. Remove the catheter and

hold your bladder for as long as possible. Lay down and rotate from

front, side, back, side and back to front every 10 minutes when the

solution is in your bladder. It may burn because of the cancer and

because of the acid environment normally in the bladder, but it will

not harm you.

FYI for everyone, this 5% solution is very effective orally and in

the colon using enemas if you can get the solution directly to the

cancer and it has not spread to lymph or deeper tissues.

Hope this helps,

Hope

[Guest guest]

As with anything, cost is the issue. Arm and Hammer is about 1/10

the price of baking soda in a health food store. The amount of

aluminum in it must be next to nothing.

>

> The energetic people say it does show up in their testing. (Bio

energetic testing)

> they actually called A & H and were told there is none in it.

>  

> But they do detect it in there. They finally figured it was

probably put in aluminum containers somewhere and thus it shows up.So

they tell their patients not to use it.

>  

> The cancer clinic one friend went to (out of country) told them the

same and said it is a small amount but do not recommend using it.

>  

>  

> thx !!

>  

> Dennis

>  

>

[Guest guest]

Bob's Red Hill...does not contain aluminum.

 

[Guest guest]

I got the impression from some posts that their authors were of the

opinion that there was only one pathogen involved in cancers, whereas my

reading had led me to understand that there could be several.

I happened to be looking through the " Frex " frequencies, and saw

reference to a " Candida carcinomas " .

I googled that phrase, and while most of the references were other

frequency lists, I thought recent discussion made the following excerpts

from someone's comments interesting:

" Also Baking soda kills stomach acid so unless bound to Maple Syrup I

wouldn’t use it.

The Maple Syrup + Baking Soda thing on the other hand does have some

value. The point is that you don't need a lot and you don't need it

often but 1/2-1tsp first thing in the morning isn't a bad thing for most.

If properly done and taken on an empty stomach the sugar bypasses the

stomach and is taken up in the small intestine without much stomach

involvement. The cancers I can claim it works on are opportunistic

Candida carcinomas and Leukemia which appears to require Hg toxicity and

a Barium Chemtrail dump. " - http://www.curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1364686 "

However, this person appears to be using it not as nomenclature in the

Latin style but in the plural as in " carconomas caused by Candida " , perhaps?

Someone else claimed Bicarbonate of soda (baking soda US) had worked on

basal cell carcinomas (topically)

Rowena

>

> Some of you may be interested to know that I finally got a website up that

speaks of my Dance with cancer and how baking soda played a huge role in

knocking it out.

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hello Rowena,

There is no possible way that the baking soda/syrup thing can work

the way it is described. Baking soda is almost immediately

disassociated into sodium and carbon dioxide upon entering the

stomach. The two substances only form a mixture. They are not

chemically bonded. They are stuck together via the stickieness of

the syrup. The syrup itself will be broken down in the liver to

produce glucose. Glucose is the sugar that cancer cells uptake.

They can't take the sugars directly from the syrup. By that time the

baking soda is long gone. On top of all this baking soda is not

particularly toxic to cancer cells. If you inject it right into a

tumor it will cause damage to the cells, just like multiple other

substances that are at either end of the pH scale. I've packed wet

baking soda right onto exposed tumors that had burst through the

skin. You could leave this on there all day as a poultice and

nothing would happen. This is nothing like " IPT in reverse " like many

have said. It not only does not work, there is no way it could work

(baking soda/syrup).

All of this stuff started on the cancer tutor website with a fanciful

story. I'm pretty sure this has been retracted there since then.

The baking soda/syrup thing was coincidental with the very suspect

Simoncini material. These two ideas have merged and gained a life of

their own.

This type of thing might seem amusing, but it wastes the time of a

lot of people and time is of the essence for many of them.

Mike

Tuesday, April 21, 2009, 12:39:48 PM, you wrote:

R> The Maple Syrup + Baking Soda thing on the other hand does have some

R> value. The point is that you don't need a lot and you don't need it

R> often but 1/2-1tsp first thing in the morning isn't a bad thing for most.

R> If properly done and taken on an empty stomach the sugar bypasses the

R> stomach and is taken up in the small intestine without much stomach

R> involvement. The cancers I can claim it works on are opportunistic

R> Candida carcinomas and Leukemia which appears to require Hg toxicity and

R> a Barium Chemtrail dump. " -

R> http://www.curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1364686 "

R> However, this person appears to be using it not as nomenclature in the

R> Latin style but in the plural as in " carconomas caused by Candida " , perhaps?

R> Someone else claimed Bicarbonate of soda (baking soda US) had worked on

R> basal cell carcinomas (topically)

R> Rowena

>>

>> Some of you may be interested to know that I finally got a website up that

speaks of my Dance with cancer and how baking soda played a huge role in

knocking it out.

>>

>>

>>

R> ------------------------------------

R>

[Guest guest]

The maple syrup / baking soda story was first reported in some tabloid newspaper

like the Globe or National Enquirer or something like that. Bill

spread it in his newsletter. It ended up on CancerTutor website for awhile. It

seemed to have double the impact because of Simonici's (sp?) supposed cures with

baking soda.

Then people began researching the story. Not a single person in the story could

be located. It became clear after awhile that the story was fabricated, as

these tabloids tend to do. I think Bill retracted his endorsement,

and CancerTutor did likewise. It also became clear that it would not work in a

chemical sense, as Mike has made clear.

Too bad, really -- such a simple cure it would have been.

But I do have to report on one thing -- I did read in one of the tabloids that

Saddam Hussein and Bin Laden got married in a gay marriage celebration, which

they actually had pictures of. (Hussein looked stunning in his white wedding

dress, which contrasted nicely with his profusion of black chest hair, 5 o'clock

shadow and moustache.) They later went on to adopt a chimpanzee, which they

shaved to make it more human-like. I guess the marriage is over now that

Hussein was executed. I'm not sure what happened to the chimp, and I guess

nobody's sure what happened to Bin Laden.

>

>

>

> R> The Maple Syrup + Baking Soda thing on the other hand does have some

> R> value. The point is that you don't need a lot and you don't need it

> R> often but 1/2-1tsp first thing in the morning isn't a bad thing for most.

>

> R> If properly done and taken on an empty stomach the sugar bypasses the

> R> stomach and is taken up in the small intestine without much stomach

> R> involvement. The cancers I can claim it works on are opportunistic

> R> Candida carcinomas and Leukemia which appears to require Hg toxicity and

> R> a Barium Chemtrail dump. " -

> R> http://www.curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1364686 "

>

> R> However, this person appears to be using it not as nomenclature in the

> R> Latin style but in the plural as in " carconomas caused by Candida " ,

perhaps?

>

> R> Someone else claimed Bicarbonate of soda (baking soda US) had worked on

> R> basal cell carcinomas (topically)

>

> R> Rowena

>

>

> >>

> >> Some of you may be interested to know that I finally got a website up that

speaks of my Dance with cancer and how baking soda played a huge role in

knocking it out.

> >>

> >>

> >>

>

>

> R> ------------------------------------

>

> R>

[Guest guest]

Rowena,

Could you elaborate in the " maple syrup sugar bypasses the stomach... " ??

Thx

Rowena wrote:

> I got the impression from some posts that their authors were of the

> opinion that there was only one pathogen involved in cancers, whereas my

> reading had led me to understand that there could be several.

>

> I happened to be looking through the " Frex " frequencies, and saw

> reference to a " Candida carcinomas " .

>

> I googled that phrase, and while most of the references were other

> frequency lists, I thought recent discussion made the following excerpts

> from someone's comments interesting:

>

> " Also Baking soda kills stomach acid so unless bound to Maple Syrup I

> wouldn’t use it.

>

> The Maple Syrup + Baking Soda thing on the other hand does have some

> value. The point is that you don't need a lot and you don't need it

> often but 1/2-1tsp first thing in the morning isn't a bad thing for most.

>

> If properly done and taken on an empty stomach the sugar bypasses the

> stomach and is taken up in the small intestine without much stomach

> involvement. The cancers I can claim it works on are opportunistic

> Candida carcinomas and Leukemia which appears to require Hg toxicity and

> a Barium Chemtrail dump. " - http://www.curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1364686 "

>

> However, this person appears to be using it not as nomenclature in the

> Latin style but in the plural as in " carconomas caused by Candida " , perhaps?

>

> Someone else claimed Bicarbonate of soda (baking soda US) had worked on

> basal cell carcinomas (topically)

>

> Rowena

>

>

>

>> Some of you may be interested to know that I finally got a website up that

speaks of my Dance with cancer and how baking soda played a huge role in

knocking it out.

>>

>>

>>

>>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

>

[Guest guest]

No, I have no experience or knowledge of it. The comment was made by

someone else, which I read on the website as per the link I included.

R

(But if I wanted something to bypass the stomach I imagine I would use

DMSO and put it on topically)

Cuns-Rial@... wrote:

> Rowena,

> Could you elaborate in the " maple syrup sugar bypasses the stomach... " ??

> Thx

>

>

>> involvement. The cancers I can claim it works on are opportunistic

>> Candida carcinomas and Leukemia which appears to require Hg toxicity and

>> a Barium Chemtrail dump. " - http://www.curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1364686 "

>>

>> H

>