Guest guest Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 Hi: does anyone have experience with full body thermograms. I know about theones for BC.... I am trying to evaluate if a full body one would be a good option for me: i had Bc and NHl. Pls share your experience. It would help a great deal. Thank you. e I cancelled my mammo. I remember the last one: OMG what pain! not counting the rads!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2010 Report Share Posted September 20, 2010 e, about ten years ago I did a full body thermogram on a very thin middle-aged woman with NHL. I used a CRT-2000 by Eidem. I have never seen a thermogram of anyone who was so non-reactive. There was virtually no temperature change anywhere on her body in both readings -- immediately after removing her clothes and ten minutes later when exposed to ambient temperature. My equipment would measure skin temperatures to the nearest tenth of a degree centigrade. This woman wanted to do IPT but could not afford it. Her insurance covered conventional chemotherapy. I had a long telephone conversation with her conventional oncologist who was very resistant to the idea of IPT. We negotiated and he agreed to give her half the usual dose of chemo, but he was not willing to use the insulin. I then taught the woman how to bring down her own blood sugar for the process. When the day came for her chemo her oncologist did not show up but was replaced by an associate who gave her the full dose chemo without telling her. She died in a week or so. At 01:49 PM 9/20/2010, you wrote: > >Hi: > >does anyone have experience with full body thermograms. I know about >theones for BC.... I am trying to evaluate if a full body one would >be a good option for me: i had Bc and NHl. > >Pls share your experience. It would help a great deal. > >Thank you. > >e > >I cancelled my mammo. I remember the last one: OMG what pain! not >counting the rads!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 21, 2010 Report Share Posted September 21, 2010 This is fascinating. This is why i really want to explore IPT for my further treatments. My condition is surely " less " threatening than before, as I can clearly see the tumor is nearly gone and it was never anywhere else in my body. I can't agree on another full dose of chemo. I read that IPT uses about 10% of the conventional chemo dose - for Doxorubicin alone, the standard is about 100mg compared to 10mg with IPT. I really believe that people should explore IPT along with natural protocols for better success against aggressive cancers. > > e, about ten years ago I did a full body thermogram on a very > thin middle-aged woman with NHL. I used a CRT-2000 by Eidem. I have > never seen a thermogram of anyone who was so non-reactive. There was > virtually no temperature change anywhere on her body in both readings > -- immediately after removing her clothes and ten minutes later when > exposed to ambient temperature. My equipment would measure skin > temperatures to the nearest tenth of a degree centigrade. > > This woman wanted to do IPT but could not afford it. Her insurance > covered conventional chemotherapy. I had a long telephone > conversation with her conventional oncologist who was very resistant > to the idea of IPT. We negotiated and he agreed to give her half the > usual dose of chemo, but he was not willing to use the insulin. I > then taught the woman how to bring down her own blood sugar for the > process. When the day came for her chemo her oncologist did not show > up but was replaced by an associate who gave her the full dose chemo > without telling her. She died in a week or so. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.