Re: Fw: Ira's issues/and from other list

[Guest guest]

At or about 08:27, 13/08/02 (my clock), Dale made the following

statement:

=========Start of Material Being Replied to========

>Big Ops!!!!!

>

>I made a major mistake and didn't notice that I actually sent this to

>Ira's

>personal address while monitoring a reply. Sorry Ira! I really meant for

>this to be on the groups page and not to send it directly to you. Now

>they

>can read the post as it was meant to be instead of your needing to

>request

>from the group as to whether being a satan and like wormwood is a good

>thing.

I am shocked that you sent that to the whole group.

So I then sent my reply, which I had intended to be private, to the

entire group.

I guess you hadn't seen Adrienne's posting yet.

>I was in just too much of a hurry

Yes, apparently so.

---------------------------

IRA L. JACOBSON

---------------------------

mailto:laser@...

[Guest guest]

Dale,

Although there have been times when I have stood up for Ira, because I

wanted to give his intentions the benefit of the doubt, I have to agree with

most of what you say. Although I have found some of his questions and

points interesting at times, he just goes on and on, ad nauseum, determined

to have the last word. It is a game, a duel of sorts, of words. Perhaps he

is only like this on-line, where anonymous debate allows him to entertain

himself. OR, perhaps he is like this all the time, in which case he

probably only has his sense of superiority to keep him warm at night.

Sorry Ira, I really don't have anything against you. I just have a feeling

that relationships are probably not your strong point. If I am totally

wrong on that point, I'm glad.

Keep in mind that you don't always have to have the last word on a topic for

people to give consideration to the things you say.

Debra

_________________________________________________________________

Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

[Guest guest]

If no one rises to the bait and no one answers, it will take all the fun

out of it.

You're right! That's a good word of wisdom to live by.

Susie

[Guest guest]

If no one rises to the bait and no one answers, it will take all the fun

out of it.

Lvquilting@...

[Guest guest]

You misunderstood my post. I meant if people would stop answering the

posts that are argumentative and off topic, maybe those types of posts

would stop and the list would be used for what it was intended: sharing

of information about gallbladder/liver problems/cleansings/remedies.

On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Adrienne McLaughlin

<adriennelynn1@...> writes:

Hi,

Are we to take your post seriously? I'm writing to you off-board because

visitors/members of the board shouldn't have to wade through these kinds

of posts.

Well, I guess your post is one way of looking at it....I suppose having

fun is what motivates some posters to make the comments they do.

However, the board is supposed to be about liver cleansing, and

visiters/members who have to sift through all the inflamatory posts, may

not find the help they need. We're not here to be " entertained. "

If the inflamatory comments don't stop, everyone's posts will have to be

moderated...meaning they'll have to go through the moderators first.

Adrienne

lvquilting@... wrote:

If no one rises to the bait and no one answers, it will take all the fun

out of it.

Lvquilting@...