Tumors (was mammography)

[Guest guest]

I don't think there is any hard and fast rule here. I do believe that Dr.

Issels is correct for certain situations. In my opinion, if the tumor can

be removed efficiently or the tumor has the possibility of causing concerns

with an organ then removing it is probability a good option. I do believe

that there are times that the tumor should be left alone especially if

conventional treatment is going to be followed.

I had the tumor removed from my colon and a resection performed. The

alternative doc that I interned under taught me that it is much easier

cleaning up the blood after tumor removal than dealing with a tumor. Not

always, but most of the time. This is presuming that the clean-up will be

accomplished by using natural medicine, not conventional. He had a

tremendous amount of experience with cancer using alternative methods and

treating the whole person. In my case, it has worked. But I don't for one

minute think it was ONLY my choice of tumor removal that helped me to get

well - but instead the synergistic effect of using a lot of different

modalities.

It is important to remember that every person is unique (conventional

medicine totally misses this concept) and while cancer is cancer, dealing

with it effectively with natural medicine means that the whole person must

be taken into consideration. Cleansing & detoxification, healthy diet, pure

water, clean air, exercise, sunshine, natural supplementation, lymphatic

drainage and one of the most important - dealing with emotional issues such

as anger, negative emotions, victim mentality, past hurts, etc. I have seen

people do everything correctly and compliantly, except that they would not

deal with their emotions or their past hurts and the result was that they

did not get well.

I have said this before and will continue to emphasize the importance of

taking the time to effectively deal with emotions. If you think that you

don't need to bother with this - then you probably need it the most. )

And because we are each so unique, I believe that we all have a toxic

threshold that is unique to us. In other words my threshold may be 500,000

and Uncle Harry who smoked, drank, never exercised and consumed all his

foods fried may have a toxic threshold of 900,000. Thus I may develop

disease or health concerns much earlier in life than he does because my

threshold is so much lower. What produces a lower threshold? Being exposed

to higher levels of toxins at an earlier age - even in the womb. This is

possibly one reason that we are seeing people younger and younger presenting

disease that used to only be seen in much older people. These toxins come

from food, air, water, negative emotions, media, environmental, etc.

Certainly " how " we take care of ourselves plays into this, but I think it

has more to do with our personal toxic threshold. Something to think about.

Be Well

Loretta

______________________

Dr Issels urged the removal of the tumor so as to give the immune system

less

to deal with.