Fw: [Dr] Codex ~ Aug. 22 Deadline

[Guest guest]

This was originally sent to me via another group, but I thought you may like

to be updated.

REGARDS ANNE

> HEALTH FREEDOM ALERT

>

> http://www.lef.org/featured-articles/health_freedom_080602.html

>

> The FDA is attempting to medicalize dietary supplements in order to limit

your access to these safe products.

>

> The FDA has an August 22 deadline on a comments period regarding their

Draft Comments to the UN's Codex Alimentarius Commission's Committee on

Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Use.

>

> FDA is attempting to make an end run around US dietary supplement laws and

to set us up for harmonization to very restrictive international vitamin

standards, but with your help they can be stopped!!

>

> Please send the following comment to: ncrane@..., with a cc to

your Senators and Congressmen.

>

> [for email addresses of your Senators and Congressmen see

http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov]

>

> also cc your comment to jham@...

> Beth Yetley, FDA c/o Crane, FDA

>

> Re: Comment on FDA Draft Proposal to Codex CCNFSDU on Dietary Supplements

>

> Dear Dr.Yetley:

>

> Re FDA proposed language: item 5.9, which states:

>

> " We recommend the following revision: 'All labels should bear a statement

that a supplement should be taken on an advice of a nutritionist, a

dietician, or a medical doctor "

>

> Dr.Yetley: When is the FDA going to STOP attempting to medicalize safe

dietary supplements which are regulated in the USA as FOODS?

>

> You have no legal mandate to attempt to go beyond the firm dictates of US

law when you are at Codex meetings in Germany.

>

> FDA has lost on first amendment grounds in the Pearson decision, and when

FDA refused to obey the court's decision, FDA was sued again and lost. FDA

has no choice but to allow health claims to be put on labels pertaining to

folic acid and the prevention of neural tube defects and other similar

matters.

>

> This is as it should be, not only in the USA, but throughout the world.

>

> Consumers have a RIGHT to learn about the beneficial health properties of

dietary supplements on the label, at the point of sale.

>

> By putting the above language on the label (that supplements should be

taken on the advice of a nutritionist, dietician, or an MD) you are

attempting to violate the spirit of DSHEA in an international forum, and you

have no legal right to do that.

>

> You are attempting to waste valuable space on the label that can be put to

better use directly informing consumers regarding the beneficial properties

of these safe food substances, you are attempting to medicalize dietary

supplements, and you are attempting to go through CODEX to make an end run

around US domestic laws by attempting to set us up for harmonization to

restrictive international standards.

>

> I therefor INSIST that you STRIKE the above proposed revision in item 5.9

and replace it with the following language instead: " item 5.9 we recommend

the following revision " All labels should bear scientific structure function

health claims similar to those provided for under the American Dietary

Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 to directly assist consumers in

making positive health decisions for themselves and their families at the

point of sale while reading the label on the product.

>

> The USA again reiterates its desire that all attempts to continue creating

an international standard for vitamins and minerals cease at Codex and that

this matter is best left up to national authorities to decide. "

>

> Dr.Yetley: I remind you, and Congress, that you lost the Pearson court

decision, and when you attempted to ignore the Judge, you were sued and lost

again on this issue.

>

> Do not attempt to get around US law when you are in Germany representing

the USA at Codex meetings.

>

> You have no legal right to make the statement in item 5.9 'All labels

should bear a statement that a supplement should be taken on an advice of a

nutritionist, a dietician, or a medical doctor "

>

> I INSIST that you replace that language with " All labels should bear

scientific structure function health claims similar to those provided for

under the American Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 to

directly assist consumers in making positive health decisions for themselves

and their families at the point of sale while reading the label on the

product.

>

> The USA again reiterates its desire that all attempts to continue creating

an international standard for vitamins and minerals cease at Codex and that

this matter is best left up to national authorities to decide. "

>

> I am copying this letter to you to my Senators and Congressmen and am

asking them to oppose all efforts to erode US sovereignty via FTAA.

>

> The last thing we need in this hemisphere is a version of the EU

dictatorship given the way the EU is attempting to ban consumer access to

dietary supplements. See Pearson v Thomson http://www.emord.com.

>

> Sincerely,

> [Your Name and Address]

>

>

>