Comdyne /Re: One way to treat cancer???

[Guest guest]

Very good point. However, many people diagnosed with cancer may not

actually have cancer. Biopsies are very subjective and depending upon

the method used, may be of little value. Modern medicine is set in

their ways and nearly always use biopsy as the first test for cancer.

later they use blood tests such as CA-125, among others, many of

which are themselves dubious in accuracy.

We need to understand that there exists a high level of unethical

behavior among doctors. Far too many are in medicine for financial

gain and they often take advantage of the ignorance of their

patients. This is why second and third opinions are so very

important. When going to a new doctor to compare the diagnosis do not

let the new doctor know why you are there but pretend to be a new

concerned patient. Many specialists only accept referrals which is

inherently biased and highly suspect they match stories to reaffirm

the original diagnosis for two reasons, one to exploit the patient

and two, to minimize the potential of litigation. An awful lot of

doctors are evil. Be a wise consumer and learn everything you can

about your condition. Question everything, if the Doc gets mad find

another doctor. Its your life, not his.

One favorite ploy they use is to pick on a local TV personality and

diagnose them as having cancer so that they appear to the public that

they have been cured when, in fact, they never had cancer in the

first place. I would be willing to bet that everyone who lives in a

major metropolitan area has known of a local personality or two who

successfully beaten the disease and are advocates to whatever medical

prattle presented to them. Pushing mammograms is a good example.

In my opinion, hCG and lactic acid levels in the blood are the best predictors.

All

cancer produces hCG. When the first pregnancy testers came on the

market they were sensitive enough to detect about 94% of all cancers

because cancer and pregnancy produce the same identical hormone.

Shortly thereafter, the manufacturers raised the threshold levels of

the urine tests so that they would not pick up most early cancers.

These tests are still manufactured in the U.S. but are for export

only. They cannot be legally re-imported back into the U.S. Why? Come

on now think about it...

In my opinion, traditional cancer treatments don't work. As I see it, hMany

live longer without any treatment at all. Again, get Dr. Philip

Binzel's book. He had no reason to lie. He was hounded just like all

the other great doctors. To quote Harry Hoxsey's attorney: (not in

his exact words but close).

" It takes a lot of courage to hold yourself out as being able to

furnish medicines that can cure cancer and operate a big place in a

big city like Dallas. I don't believe a man, knowingly lying about it

could do it. "

Those who survive from conventional treatments (who actually had

cancer) live not because of it, but in spite of it.

>

> arlynsg@... writes:

> > And quite frankly, not everyone who uses only traditional

medicine dies from cancer. Some people are doing great afterwards.

> >

>

> most that I know who did traditional, have a lot of after effects.

One

> friend of mine had radiation for breast cancera and it destroyed

the muscles in her upper arms..she has no use of her arms/hands now.

It horrible.

>