Re: Should cancer patients eat sugar? NO ! use stevia

[Guest guest]

Well for one thing , reason.

What is the best way the medical profession has for finding cancer?

PET Scan

You introduce High glucose (with radarioactive additive) into the body. Then the

cancer sucks it up at a much higher rate and the pet scan can see that activity

and thus you detect the cancer.

Thus proving cancer really eats up glucose. So if most all foods have some

glucose conversion , we need to add as little as possible. Especially sugar and

the like.

Stevia is a great alternative , and in fact is sweeter than sugar.

here is an article on how a pet scan works.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/154877.php

Dennis

Yeah, I thought that would get your attention! LOL Seriously, I'm in a heated

debate with an energy healer I know about this subject. He says that all foods

break down to glucose in the body, so eating sugar makes no difference. He says

he has never found a doctor or researcher who says there is a connection between

eating sugar and cancer. So he wants to me provide him with a peer reviewed

study using real cancer patients. Figured this list was as close to that as I

was gonna get.

I'm making the standard argument that even though all food turns to glucose in

the body, many foods with natural sugars (fruit/beans) have vitamins, minerals

and fiber to slow that insulin spike. And when a body has a condition whereby

sugar exacerbates a condition, why encourage anyone to eat MORE of it?

Anyone have any data ammunition I can fire his way? ... anyone?

xxoo

[Guest guest]

Stevia is great

[Guest guest]

Dennis,

Just follow the Adkins diet.

Jan P.

Phu Kiao

Thailand

________________________________