Guest guest Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 Many cancerous tumors have a high affinity for sugar and this corresponds with their virulence. Both PET-CTs and IPT take advantage of this fact. If a tumor is indolent or low grade then there is little attraction for sugar or anything else. The attempt to poison such a tumor by using IPT as a targeting strategy shows little understanding of how IPT is intended to work. Low grade tumors are almost benign and very difficult to eradicate, but because of their genetic instability they can turn aggressive. Sometimes the smart move is to avoid any type of chemo against a low grade tumor as chemo starts the clock such that the tumor will turn aggressive much more quickly. This has been especially noted with conventional chemotherapy for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. I believe your situation was that you had no tumor load when you commenced IPT. For someone who might well have seen full-dose chemotherapy as a viable choice as adjuvant therapy, IPT makes for a sensible alternative - especially when limited and when used with other therapies to protect immune function and/or kill any residual cancer cells. When a person places their fate in the hands of another I think that encouragement and support of their decision (even if it is an impoverished decision) may lead to a better outcome. Such support may be warranted even if it is objectively unrealistic. But if a person is making decisions for oneself and is taking responsibility for all treatment decisions, then such a sovereign person wants facts, facts, facts. They don't have patience for stories of the god-like skills of some practitioner or how some medicine or supplement is the medicinal ambrosia of the future. Last week a program participant came to me and told me that Jesus brought them to me. This is so unnerving. What am I supposed to say: " Yes, my son, Jesus sends me many referrals, " or do I ask, " Have you been smoking your teenager's cigarettes? " I haven't thought of picking a God for a while, but the sun god is high on my list. There is no question that it was the Sun that brought me to coastal Southern California. At our retreat center we have two solaria for performing our divine prostrations. I just finished reading a fine book, " The Healing Sun " by Hobday. It gives historical and scientific support for the concept of health benefits of the early morning sun. The sun is so much better of an adjuvant than having any form of chemotherapy needle stuck in you. _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Prem Carol Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 4:19 PM Subject: [ ] Low Grade Cancers I am curious if you can elaborate on your theory of why you say that " low grade cancers " would not respond to IPT or chemo. I have seen people with low grades get IPT and have success. I have seen metastatic microscopic carpets of cancer cells being wiped out. But every case is different, so you may have some information that would apply somewhere that would be beneficial. Could you elaborate? I am interested to hear what you are thinking. The only thing I can think of is that they are not so voracious, so would not uptake the chemo as fully as more virulent types. Is that what you mean? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2011 Report Share Posted January 5, 2011 Dear , This is excellent information. Thank you for confirming that IPT was a good choice 4 years ago for wiping out the metastatic microscopic cells. I have tested clear for all this time in all those areas, but in the past year I have been dealing with a different diagnosis. There have been small nodules/cavitating nodules in the lungs...found accidentally at the bottom of the lungs during a routine CT. Then the whole lung area was CT'd. Other nodules were there but extremely tiny. I have tried many things over the past year. First, they are so tiny (millimeters) that they cannot even be biopsied. On the guess that it was connected to uterine cancer cells that had traveled and remained dormant, slowly growing over this time, we first tried a course of IPT. When the results were mixed and not that definitive, I stopped that course and did Vit. C drips for 5 months. After which the results showed very minimal but some tiny millimeter growth. We then did the Greek Test and did another course of IPT, using different drugs. The results of the CT scan showed total stabilization....to the millimeter of 4 months prior. I am hoping that we destabilized any cancer that might have been in these nodules, since no new growth usually is a good and positive sign. Further, some of these nodules are cavitating nodules, which I have heard, as long as they do not grow, could take years to disappear from " view " . It has been suggested that I go back to a traditional pulmonologist for their opinion, but I am extremely reluctant to face their energy field. Also, last time they could only guess as well as to what it might be. I will have to ponder whether I can get any more useful " information " from them without imbibing their type of mentality. Now I am doing Vit. C drips every 3 weeks and still using my amethyst biomat daily (since 4 months ago). I am sure that has been very beneficial as well. I know that my IPT doctor had already confirmed to me what you mentioned about such small cells not uptaking that much chemo/sugar. However, it was our best guess at the time to try and manifest a change and I decided to go for it. So your discussion is very much in alignment with what I had suspected. And we are not even 100% sure what we have been dealing with, in any case. But the Greek test did show how to kill the cancer cells, and I am sure it did something positive...possibly stabilizing everything. I am wondering if I should get a water ozonator to add that to my daily regime and if so which one (the Hulda Portazone or another one?)....I have an alkaline/ionizer water machine and try to drink a couple of glasses of that inbetween meals when I can. And of course upping all my extra immune ideas, etc. If you have any thoughts at all to add to my current situation, I would be most happy to hear them. On another note, I know someone with metastatic breast cancer to the bone who can hardly walk because of the pain. I am thinking of referring them to your clinic. Have you had success with this type of situation? Regarding the " reasons " people come to you, on a lighter note, hey, just say, " Hallelujah " !!! (joking here). Could be a feather, a smile, a line of music, anything can guide someone. Unless it brings up deeper problems while being with you,and really gets in the way, hey, whatever works, wherever people's " messages " come from!!! And yes, isn't this the best place in San Diego to heal!!! We are so lucky to live here. In appreciation for you, your love and expertise that you share, Carol > > Many cancerous tumors have a high affinity for sugar and this corresponds > with their virulence. Both PET-CTs and IPT take advantage of this fact. If > a tumor is indolent or low grade then there is little attraction for sugar > or anything else. The attempt to poison such a tumor by using IPT as a > targeting strategy shows little understanding of how IPT is intended to > work. > > > > Low grade tumors are almost benign and very difficult to eradicate, but > because of their genetic instability they can turn aggressive. Sometimes > the smart move is to avoid any type of chemo against a low grade tumor as > chemo starts the clock such that the tumor will turn aggressive much more > quickly. This has been especially noted with conventional chemotherapy for > indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. > > > > I believe your situation was that you had no tumor load when you commenced > IPT. For someone who might well have seen full-dose chemotherapy as a > viable choice as adjuvant therapy, IPT makes for a sensible alternative - > especially when limited and when used with other therapies to protect immune > function and/or kill any residual cancer cells. > > > > When a person places their fate in the hands of another I think that > encouragement and support of their decision (even if it is an impoverished > decision) may lead to a better outcome. Such support may be warranted even > if it is objectively unrealistic. But if a person is making decisions for > oneself and is taking responsibility for all treatment decisions, then such > a sovereign person wants facts, facts, facts. They don't have patience for > stories of the god-like skills of some practitioner or how some medicine or > supplement is the medicinal ambrosia of the future. > > > > Last week a program participant came to me and told me that Jesus brought > them to me. This is so unnerving. > What am I supposed to say: " Yes, my son, Jesus sends me many referrals, " or > do I ask, " Have you been smoking your teenager's cigarettes? " I haven't > thought of picking a God for a while, but the sun god is high on my list. > There is no question that it was the Sun that brought me to coastal Southern > California. At our retreat center we have two solaria for performing our > divine prostrations. > > > > I just finished reading a fine book, " The Healing Sun " by Hobday. > It gives historical and scientific support for the concept of health > benefits of the early morning sun. The sun is so much better of an adjuvant > than having any form of chemotherapy needle stuck in you. > > > > > > > > _____ > > From: [mailto: ] On > Behalf Of Prem Carol > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 4:19 PM > > Subject: [ ] Low Grade Cancers > > > I am curious if you can elaborate on your theory of why you say that " low > grade cancers " would not respond to IPT or chemo. > > I have seen people with low grades get IPT and have success. I have seen > metastatic microscopic carpets of cancer cells being wiped out. > > But every case is different, so you may have some information that would > apply somewhere that would be beneficial. > > Could you elaborate? > > I am interested to hear what you are thinking. The only thing I can think of > is that they are not so voracious, so would not uptake the chemo as fully as > more virulent types. Is that what you mean? > > Thanks. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 6, 2011 Report Share Posted January 6, 2011 --- " Gammill " <vgammill> wrote: > Last week a program participant came to me and told me that Jesus brought > them to me. This is so unnerving. > What am I supposed to say: " Yes, my son, Jesus sends me many referrals, " or > do I ask, " Have you been smoking your teenager's cigarettes? " I haven't > thought of picking a God for a while, but the sun god is high on my list. > There is no question that it was the Sun that brought me to coastal Southern > California. At our retreat center we have two solaria for performing our > divine prostrations. > C'mon . Just because you don't believe in spirituality, doesn't mean none of us do. I have read so many posts by you, bashing spirituality, and I have remained silent. Why you even interjected this story into a post about IPT is beyond me. Honestly, it's the spiritual path that is keeping me strong, no matter what. To ignore the spiritual side of your humanity is, in my opinion, leaving the eggs out of the cake mix. We are body, mind, and spirit ... to ignore any of those can have consequences. But it's your choice to make. It is not my personal choice and I, for one, would appreciate it if you would keep your spiritual intolerance, and your mockery of us who believe, to yourself or post on some atheistic list somewhere. For many of us, the spiritual is the only thing keeping us here. For me, the spiritual path is my primary treatment these days after trying damn near everything else ... even your retreat. And I'm stronger than I've been in years. I'm just sayin' ... totally disrespectful of other's beliefs and treatment choices ... and especially with a life and death issue, IMO. xxoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 I agree, Sandy ... and I have been reading this for the past four years without comment. Just had to say it. I do respect where is coming from. I don't agree with it. But I don't bash his beliefs, or lack of, at all. He's entitled to them. Without blatant denigration. Seems that everyone wants Christians to be tolerant of their beliefs, but God forbid we should talk about ours! LOL xoo > > Hi , > > I agree VGammill should respect the fact some people believe in Gods/Lords and such but by the same token we should respect the fact that VGammill is an anti-Christianist. When we do that we can relegate his statements to where they belong...ahem. > > I believe a person can be spiritual without having to attach a deity to it. I also believe even VGammill would have to agree we have an energy body [i.e. spiritual body] otherwise many of his diagnostic instruments would not work. > > If anyone questions the existence of a spiritual body I would recommend reading...Consciousness Beyond Life--The Science of the Near-Death Experience by Prim van Lommel M.D. > > I agree with PierreTeilhard de Chardin----We are not human beings having a spiritual experience. We are spiritual beings having a human experience. > > > Sandy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 OK, tolerance .... magnanimity ... whatever. Either way, everyone here should be able to express their beliefs without any fear that they will be ridiculed for them. xxoo " Gammill " <vgammill@...> wrote: > > I am not anti-Christian or anti much of anything except intolerance and this > even includes tolerance. Tolerance is just a mild, and sugar-coated form of > intolerance. Tolerance has an odor of superciliousness to it. Tolerance is > implicitly allowing, perhaps grudgingly, the right of others to breathe a > few molecules of the same air, at least for a while. Perhaps tolerance is a > stepping stone to wean people from intolerance, and I can understand this. > Again, the opposite of intolerance is not tolerance; it is magnanimity, > which is the most praiseworthy of all virtues. If everyone's prayerbook had > just that one word " Magnanimity " we'd soon have a much better world. > > The Center has been slow this week. If we have any preachers on the list I > can be hired to write a sermon. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.