No cure for cancer

[Guest guest]

Hi Jim what I mean there is no such thing a cure for cancer. This was told

to me by my naturopath told in 2007 and lately by my urologist at

a party my wife and I went to. He said there never will be a cure for

cancer, as we have cancer cells from the moment we are conceived to the moment

we die, this is why babies get cancer tumours before there born. he also told

me the cancer cells will live on for a while after we die they don't need

oxygen and when we die they have all the food they need, all around them

All our lives Our body has a balance of cancer cells and our cancer fighting

immune system, it when it all gets out of balance that we get cancer

tumours. its usually when we age our immune system gets weaker as it gets

older the problem is we eat the very foods cancer can thrive on. Simple

sugars. these are almost un know out side of the western world we live in.

the trick is to get you self back in balance

I've read a lot of articles about why cancer research can't find a cure for

cancer this one about sums' it up cheers Ray

http://www.thefrisky.com/post/246-why-cancer-still-hasnt-been-cured/

Many of us know cancer patients who are here today and gone within a matter

of weeks. The New York Times recently ran a piece

<http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/28/health/research/28cancer.html?pagewanted=

1 & hpw> with some much needed insight as to why. All the millions of dollars

raised at " Walk for the Cure " and " Relays for Life " are deposited into a

large pot of grant research money, and one would like to believe that the

money is being given to the most advanced, inventive ideas out there that

could potentially cure cancer. Unfortunately, the truth is that the dough

usually goes to small research projects that are pretty much useless and

will have the slightest, if any, impact on finding the cure.

Financial backers like the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer

Institute don't want to take risks on projects that may not garner definite

answers. So, instead, they often give the money to projects like studying

the relationship between responses to good-tasting foods and the ability to

stay on a diet--clearly a project unlikely to cure cancer anytime soon.

Since the system for awarding grants is so biased, more creative researchers

often turn to independent philanthropists to fund their work. But with the

sour economy, super rich folks just aren't whipping out their checkbooks

like they used to.

According to multiple scientists, most major discoveries come from

researchers' side work, which is not formally funded by the grants. Rather

scientists put aside some of their grant money to work on other projects,

which were not actually approved. It's such a shame that scientists have to

secretively hide money or come up with faux-research to make actual

progress. The scientists interviewed believe it's a broken system that can

only be fixed if granters start taking risks. It's almost sickening to know

that the powers that be have not been funding the out-of-the-box ideas and

are giving money to " no duh " studies. We need to get Oprah on this issue,

ASAP