Guest guest Posted December 13, 2009 Report Share Posted December 13, 2009 They write plenty of articles on 'staying alive' but I'm not about to take 'their' advice on cancer..........too much anyway. The things we need to do is continue reading, asking questions, and trying to listen to those that seem to know what they are talking about. The article wasn't at all 'prevention' but was about what many of us should be concerned with, Metastasis. Even if people were going to or already had the things that lead to mets, they could try to incorporate the use of strategies that might help ward off this problem. One example might be The Rath Protocol and I remember asking what he thought about it and his comment was, " it might benefit by helping to thwart mets " ...............and what he meant was that it wasn't, in and of itself, a cancer fighting tool. Let's assume the protocol did work and it has good information behind it, wouldn't it be great if people did this before their surgery or biopsy????????? If they were going to have surgery or a biopsy that is? Where would Jane or Doe get this info? From Dr. WhiteCoat? I don't think so. What we do know is they, The Cancer Industry, does not have much for us that experience mets let alone prevent it. Joe C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.