Guest guest Posted February 15, 2009 Report Share Posted February 15, 2009 I've read several articles saying that pancreatin is destroyed in an acidic environment, and therefore must be enteric coated, or it is wasted. I also just got done reading an article on the Life Extension site that says that a Russian study showed that pancreatin is NOT NOT NOT NOT destroyed by the acids in the stomach, and that non-enteric coated pancreatin is better than enteric coated pancreatin because the enteric coated pancreatin might go right through someone without being absorbed. Who to believe, who to believe... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 What's most essential is to use a top quality brand w/a lot of chymotrypsin (which very few brands have, except in minute qunantities). The following the best brands I know of for healing cancer: www.2line.com/drkelleyHOT.html (expensive; the best) Pancreas Pork by Nutricology.com (inexpensive; used these) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 How about Wobeenzym with 3 mg Chymotrypsin. 900 FIP unit ? How much Chymotrypsin is in dr Kelley's ?........AKP " Leonard " wrote: What's most essential is to use a top quality brand w/a lot of chymotrypsin (which very few brands have, except in minute quantities). The following the best brands I know of for healing cancer: www.2line.com/drkelleyHOT.html (expensive; the best) Pancreas Pork by Nutricology.com (inexpensive; used these) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 It appears the winner by huge amounts would be Univase Forte, with 45 mg of chymotrypsin per pill. http://www.oasisadvancedwellness.com/products/univase-forte.html#1 However, these suckers are enteric coated, and there apparently is some debate on whether this is good or bad. > > What's most essential is to use a top quality brand w/a lot of > chymotrypsin (which very few brands have, except in minute > quantities). > The following the best brands I know of for healing cancer: > www.2line.com/drkelleyHOT.html (expensive; the best) > Pancreas Pork by Nutricology.com (inexpensive; used these) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 I should give credit to Dr. Loretta for pointing out the Univase Forte, which she did a few weeks ago in the oleander group. She says it is the best there is. 45 mg of chymotrypsin is HUGE, compared to the other supplements. It would take 15 of the Wobeenzyme to match one of the Univase Forte pills. Perhaps an economical way to use these would be to buy the Univase Forte for the chymotrypsin, and perhaps cheaper brands for the other, more readily available enzymes, then take them together. > > > > What's most essential is to use a top quality brand w/a lot of > > chymotrypsin (which very few brands have, except in minute > > quantities). > > The following the best brands I know of for healing cancer: > > www.2line.com/drkelleyHOT.html (expensive; the best) > > Pancreas Pork by Nutricology.com (inexpensive; used these) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 As far as that Russian study goes - I don't believe it. I would love to see an English copy so if anyone has a copy please forward it to me. All of the enzymes in pancreatin are EXTREMELY and irretrievably pH sensitive. Once de-natured they are finished. This is an old debate. The idea is that the enzymes are taken on a completely empty stomach and washed through rapidly with a full glass of water. Under these conditions, supposedly, a large percentage of the pancreatin survives the stomach. The reason that the Germans developed the enteric coating system is precisely because the theorized " survivability " of the pancreatin washing quickly through the stomach didn't work out in a very large percentage of patients. Only the shear VOLUME of (very expensive) pancreatin made them work at all. A significant percentage of the enzymes were destroyed en route to the target in the duodenum. These types of enzymes are simply not designed to be exposed to strong acids or bases at any time. They operate best and achieve their longest life when within a small pH band near neutral. Much above or below that pH range destroys them very rapidly. The pH of the stomach rarely goes above 2-3 and spends a significant time at pH 1. Therefore, it follows that if the very expensive enzymes are to be delivered intact to the site where maximum potency, life and absorption can be achieved they should be delivered to the optimum site intact and protected from stomach acid. The best way to do that is with a pharmaceutical grade pH sensitive (very important) enteric coating, made of ingredients that are as close to inert as possible. And this is what has been done with Univase Forte. To see how quickly the coating comes off the tablet you can do a little experiment. Take a glass of tap water and add a little baking soda. It doesn't take much. Drop in a tablet. You can watch the coating dissolve from the tablet. That should dispel the idea that the coatings " fail. " They don't. And they are occasionally subjected to artificial digestive tracts to test them. I know of NO cases where tablets have passed through unabsorbed and that includes several users with extensively shortened intestines. Many of these stories of " bedpan bullets " have no actual scientific backing but are anecdotal as in " My Uncle Harry had a friend... " kind of stuff and they get propagated on forums such as this. The coating is a modified plant cellulose and it is soluble only in pH 6.8 and above. Since it is a cellulose product it is inert in the human system except as fiber, which isn't a bad thing and it is in tiny quantities, just a film over the tablet. Hope this helps. Be Well Dr.L Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Good for you doc! From: Dr. Loretta Lanphier As far as that Russian study goes - I don't believe it. I would love to see an English copy so if anyone has a copy please forward it to me. All of the enzymes in pancreatin are EXTREMELY and irretrievably pH sensitive. Once de-natured they are finished. This is an old debate. The idea is that the enzymes are taken on a completely empty stomach and washed through rapidly with a full glass of water. Under these conditions, supposedly, a large percentage of the pancreatin survives the stomach. The reason that the Germans developed the enteric coating system is precisely because the theorized " survivability " of the pancreatin washing quickly through the stomach didn't work out in a very large percentage of patients. Only the shear VOLUME of (very expensive) pancreatin made them work at all. A significant percentage of the enzymes were destroyed en route to the target in the duodenum. These types of enzymes are simply not designed to be exposed to strong acids or bases at any time. They operate best and achieve their longest life when within a small pH band near neutral. Much above or below that pH range destroys them very rapidly. The pH of the stomach rarely goes above 2-3 and spends a significant time at pH 1. Therefore, it follows that if the very expensive enzymes are to be delivered intact to the site where maximum potency, life and absorption can be achieved they should be delivered to the optimum site intact and protected from stomach acid. The best way to do that is with a pharmaceutical grade pH sensitive (very important) enteric coating, made of ingredients that are as close to inert as possible. And this is what has been done with Univase Forte. To see how quickly the coating comes off the tablet you can do a little experiment. Take a glass of tap water and add a little baking soda. It doesn't take much. Drop in a tablet. You can watch the coating dissolve from the tablet. That should dispel the idea that the coatings " fail. " They don't. And they are occasionally subjected to artificial digestive tracts to test them. I know of NO cases where tablets have passed through unabsorbed and that includes several users with extensively shortened intestines. Many of these stories of " bedpan bullets " have no actual scientific backing but are anecdotal as in " My Uncle Harry had a friend... " kind of stuff and they get propagated on forums such as this. The coating is a modified plant cellulose and it is soluble only in pH 6.8 and above. Since it is a cellulose product it is inert in the human system except as fiber, which isn't a bad thing and it is in tiny quantities, just a film over the tablet. Hope this helps. Be Well Dr.L Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 > I used 's enzyme but he refuses to reveal how much of what he has in it, so I discontinued. I'm using the very reasonably priced Megazyme Forte plus which has 45mg of a-chymotrypsin in it. > It appears the winner by huge amounts would be Univase Forte, with 45 > mg of chymotrypsin per pill. > > http://www.oasisadvancedwellness.com/products/univase-forte.html#1 > > However, these suckers are enteric coated, and there apparently is some > debate on whether this is good or bad. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.