Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 Barb, I had Pet/Ct scans six months without any side effects. I was told that the radiation strength would not kill your healthy cells. I believe that your doctor is right that Pet is needed to determine if your cancer has spread. That is very important information for you to know. This information is also a very key factor to determine what kind of treatments that you need. Yes, Pet may have side effects on you. But it is the best test method that I am aware of. Other is the blood test of AMAS which is about 90% accurate in detecting the cancer in your blood but it cannot tell you where the cancer is coming from. Good luck. In a message dated 3/10/2009 5:35:01 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, bjacksha@... writes: Hi everyone, I am knew here. Have been reading in the archives, but am hoping for some feedback. I had a total hysterectomy four weeks ago and after surgery was told that the doctor found a small " superficial " in my uterus, and because of this, they did not biopsy or remove the nearby lymph nodes during surgery. Pathology following surgery showed it was a Stage one tumor, but they also found a few tumor cells where they shouldn't be. So now they are fearing the cancer may have spread to the nodes. The doctor wants me to do a PET scan to further diagnose. I am wondering if there are alternatives to diagnose that are less harmful -- I don't do well with scans, felt lousy for a week after a CAT scan I had a few weeks before the surgery. My alternative doctor says that the radiation can cause more harm than good. I know, of course, it is my decision...just wondering what your experiences have been. Many thanks, Barb **************Need a job? Find employment help in your area. (http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?query=employment_agencies & ncid=emlcntusyelp00\ 000005) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 Hi Barb, I don't think a PET uses any radiation. A CT scan uses quite a bit, but if you are looking for a diagnosis, it's a good place to start. I've had one CT and probably will not do it again for another 5 years. Make sure your doctor explains what they are looking for, exactly, to help determine what test is best for you. It seems that many hospitals won't do a PET until the CT shows something. Another option may be an MRI. An MRI will not use any radiation, either. Remember, each scan shows something different. ar -- Arlyn Grant arlynsg@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 Positron emission tomography From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Image of a typical positron emission tomography (PET) facility Positron emission tomography (PET) is a nuclear medicine imaging technique which produces a three-dimensional image or picture of functional processes in the body. The system detects pairs of gamma rays emitted indirectly by a positron-emitting radionuclide (tracer), which is introduced into the body on a biologically active molecule. Images of tracer concentration in 3-dimensional space within the body are then reconstructed by computer analysis. In modern scanners, this reconstruction is often accomplished with the aid of a CT X-ray scan performed on the patient during the same session, in the same machine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 Read the bottom part of this entry. PET scans are always done with CT scans, and that is where the radiation is. CT scans have 150x the radiation as a chest x-ray. > > Positron emission tomography > From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia > Jump to: navigation, search > > > Image of a typical positron emission tomography (PET) facility > Positron emission tomography (PET) is a nuclear medicine imaging technique which produces a three-dimensional image or picture of functional processes in the body. The system detects pairs of gamma rays emitted indirectly by a positron-emitting radionuclide (tracer), which is introduced into the body on a biologically active molecule. Images of tracer concentration in 3-dimensional space within the body are then reconstructed by computer analysis. In modern scanners, this reconstruction is often accomplished with the aid of a CT X-ray scan performed on the patient during the same session, in the same machine. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 > > Read the bottom part of this entry. PET scans are always done with CT scans, and that is where the radiation is. CT scans have 150x the radiation as a chest x-ray. > The CT isn't always done. My last one was done on a PET/CT machine, but they didn't do the CT portion ... only the PET. I didn't have to drink anything; just got the radioactive tracer injection. xoxo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 Are you sure they didn't do the CT? You see, they need to do the CT to highlight the organs and other structures of the body. Without this, the PET scan will just show glowy areas, but a doctor wouldn't have any idea what the glowy areas are associated with. > > > > Read the bottom part of this entry. PET scans are always done with CT scans, and that is where the radiation is. CT scans have 150x the radiation as a chest x-ray. > > > > The CT isn't always done. My last one was done on a PET/CT machine, but they didn't do the CT portion ... only the PET. I didn't have to drink anything; just got the radioactive tracer injection. > > xoxo > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.