Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 What was really meant was that there were no obvious side-effects. PET and CT-Scans can be causative factors in cancer. As for the AMAS? There has been a lot of negative reports about AMAS having a high percentage of false negative and false positive findings. I am one the AMAS gave an 'all clear' to yet within three months a bladder tumor was visible when a Cystoscope was inserted into my bladder. That may not be concrete proof that AMAS does have too many incorrect findings however, added to statements from others it has to be considered. Perhaps someone, maybe , can suggest other ways to test. Oh, I forgot to add, when AMAS missed the tumor so did a CT-scan, my last, fail to detect that tumor in its beginning stages. Joe C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.