RE: UFA Challange

[Guest guest]

The science behind this is intriguing. I think the therapy has great

potential but some bugs need to be worked out:

1. Most people with cancer don't have the energy to do the requisite

exercising.

2. It can be most unpleasant as it roils and rumbles through the

intestines.

3. Its effectiveness is primarily dependent on the deacylation of the

triglycerides.

4. The best omega-3 for the purpose has not yet been determined.

5. The best and worst concurrent therapies are unknown.

6. Most fish oil contains Vit E as a preservative and this limits its

effectiveness.

7. Some people balk at the caffeine that is used as a calcium

ionophore.

8. We don't yet know who will be the best/worst candidates for this

therapy.

I have had conversations about versions of this therapy with Scheim

since 2003. He is intelligent and fastidious. I work with him on this as

is not about the money. In fact, out of his own pocket he paid for

the right fish oils for an Amish man with stage 4 melanoma. It is a therapy

which beautifully lends itself for the public domain once it is perfected.

I have tried it myself as I do with almost everything before I recommend it.

I am not anxious to do it again - not orally anyway. I am currently trying

it with volunteers in other directions. That is, the oil can be used

rectally rather than orally and I sometimes recommend theobromine (from

chocolate) rather than caffeine. I am also like the idea of using methods

for regional electroporation with this therapy. I have also saponified the

oils which I think is an improvement and I do think it is smart to conjugate

the alkene bonds.

I would be very cautious using concurrent meds with a detergent type

surfactant activity - such as Pluronic or any of the sulfonates as the

interaction is largely unknown.

Anything I say on this list is for public domain and not to be used for

patenting or for the benefit of pharmaceutical companies.

_____

From: [mailto: ] On

Behalf Of mmurra777

Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 8:22 AM

Subject: [ ] UFA Challange

Has anyone taken this? Has anyone read the site contents?

http://www.ufachallenge.org/ username: membrane password: effect

If not, why not?

If so, what results?

Has anyone become part of the collaborative? Has anyone read the information

sharing agreement? Is something missing? Who is O'Dell?

MCM

[Guest guest]

, Just food for thought.  Because you have the benefit of patients

foremost in mind, maybe you should consider having your discoveries and theories

patented. That way, those interested in just profits cannot use your ideas and

methods for their personal gain. That is a lose-lose situation.You would be able

to control the profiteering.I do believe that your time and intelligence is

worthy of monetary reward, and you could use the money to further research that

is obviously your passion in life. And, every patient you treat would know that

they were not being ripped-off.It would be a win-win situation for patients who

would be treated fairly both financially and medically. 

On this material plane: Money=Power, Power=Control.

 The world would be a better place--if you were the one in Control of your

domain.

  You are a very intelligent man who has the analytical ability to see through

the bullsh_t and search for the truth. You are street-smart and wise enough to

avoid being con-ed.

You are also a compassionate, honest man who would not con anyone himself.

Just food for thought!