Chemo Does Not Cure - Often It Inflicts Damage and Spreads Cancer

[Guest guest]

HTML clipboard

Chemo Does Not Cure - Often It Inflicts Damage and Spreads

Cancer

by Tony Isaacs

For years now, many of us who advocate natural health and natural

approaches to beating cancer have warned against the dangers and the

ineffectiveness of chemotherapy. The following report illustrates how

chemo actually spreads cancer cells, as well as points out how little

we are being told about the dangers of chemo:

As reported at the 27th Annual San Breast Cancer

<http://www.curezone.com/c/?http://curezone.com/faq/c.asp?a=4,92,637>

Symposium, Dec 2004, (abstract 6014), German investigators from

Friedrich-Schiller University in Jena, have shown that taxol (the " gold

standard of chemo " ) causes a massive release of cells into circulation.

Such a release of cancer cells would result in extensive metastasis

months or even years later, long after the chemo would be suspected as

the cause of the spread of the cancer. This little know horror of

conventional cancer treatment needs to be spread far and wide, but it

is not even listed in the side effects of taxol.

As has oft been stated, chemo does not cure cancer - it merely attempts

to eliminate the tumors and cancer cells that are symptoms of the

underlying causes of cancer, and does so with little success and great

risks. In some instances it may appear to eliminate tumors and cancer

cell masses, though most often it merely destroys some of the cancer

cells. In the process, it often inflicts a very high price.

Besides spreading cancer cells, chemo inflicts serious and perhaps

irreversible damage to the immune system, the body's natural first line

of defense against cancer and other illness - thus paving the way for

the remaining cancer cells or future cancers to overwhelm a body that

is even less able to beat the cancer that got past the immune system in

the first place.

Chemo also frequently results in serious and even fatal damage to major

organs are also damaged, particularly the liver - which as cancer

pioneer Max Gerson observed is always impaired to begin in those who

get cancer. The heart is also frequently seriously damaged.

The end result is that chemo kills more patients than it " cures " . Most

of those deaths are the result of liver or heart failure.

Statistically, it has been estimated that the five year success rate

from chemo is only about 3% (meaning only about 3% more patients who

opted for chemo survived at least five years than did those who opted

to not undergo chemo). But even that meager statistic is misleading in

two key ways:

First of all, though survival rates are slightly higher for the first

couple of years compared to those who opted out of chemo, after the

third year the survival rate for those who opted out is greater than

those who were treated with chemo and the gap widens significantly

every year after that.

And, perhaps most important of all, the survival rates compare all of

those who either undergo chemotherapy or decide against it. That

includes the very large number of people who do little or nothing to

address their chemo naturally and merely forego chemo. If chemo

survival rates were compared with those of people who not only opted out

of chemo, but also chose a non-invasive natural protocol to eliminate

the toxins and other causes of cancer, boost their immune systems and

attack the cancer naturally without inflicting damage to the rest of

the body there would surely be no comparison.

You can bet that it is a comparison the cancer industry never wants to

make.

Sources Included:

" Conventional Cancer Treatments "

alternativecancer.us/conventional.htm

" Hiding the Truth about Losing the War on Cancer "

http://tbyil.com/waroncancer.htm <http://tbyil.com/waroncancer.htm>