cross post - Re: VITAMINS AGAINST DISEASE

[Guest guest]

Subject: Crosspost - Re: VITAMINS AGAINST DISEASE

Gettingwell/message/8921

In Gettingwell@y...,

> VITAMINS AGAINST DISEASE

>

> Many persons want to know what scientific substantiation there is

that vitamins and diet can be as effective in treating illness as

nature-cure authorities maintain. In this article we will review

some classic research papers supporting vitamin therapies for curing

disease. There is nothing new about vitamin treatments, as I wish to

demonstrate by including these decades-old studies. Still, this

information may be news to you, and almost certainly will be news to

most physicians.

> Let's begin at the end, so to speak, and consider a paper that was

published in the Journal of the American College of Proctology before

the second world war entitled " Vitamins and Their Relationship to

Deficiency Diseases of the Alimentary Tract. " The author of this

undated article, A. ston, M.D., says that vitamin

deficiencies are usually multiple deficiencies, which show up over a

long period of time. " These deficiencies occur despite a balanced

diet, " says Dr. ston, " the balance of which is usually determined

by older knowledge of nutrition, and influenced by conditions in

commercial preparation and preservation. " This is what naturopaths

have been saying for years: we eat a lopsided diet of way too many

processed, cooked, devitalized foods and we are not going to get our

vitamins from any balanced collection of such imbalanced foods.

> What does deficiency of this or that vitamin result in? Dr.

ston says that " Vitamin A deficiency, by its action of increasing

epithelial irritability and infectibility, can be an important factor

in the cause of ulcers " and that " other instances of vitamin A

deficiency, are often found in conjunction with infections of the

intestinal tract, are infections of the eyes, tonsils, sinuses,

lungs, buccal and lingual mucosa, and the skin. " The eye, ear, nose

and throat specialist, or the allergist, may be a professional whose

job can be eliminated. Do your part to put them out of work by being

sure you get plentiful vitamin A. Fruits, salads, vegetables, and

multiple vitamin preparations will contain " A. "

> As to the B-vitamins, the paper states: " Vitamin B deficiency can

be considered an important factor in the cause of hemorrhoids... The

enlarged flabby colon and esophagus are due to deficiency of B by its

resulting loss of muscle tonicity, partial failure of elimination,

with obstipation as the end result. " Loss of bowel action and the

resulting constipation caused by B-vitamin deficiency was also

discussed by Dr. Louis Gross in 1924 in the Journal of Pathology and

Bacteriology in his paper, " The Effects of Vitamin Deficient Diets on

Rats, With Special Reference to the Motor Functions of the Intestinal

Tract In Vivo and In Vitro. " Dr. Gross noted that B-vitamin

deficiency also produces damage to kidneys, spleen, pancreas, testes,

ovaries and liver. Since so many persons have health problems

centered in these areas, we may reasonably suspect population wide

vitamin B deficiency. Naturopathic authorities suspect exactly

this. B-vitamins are lost rapidly by the body when it is under

stress. Since most of us are indeed under stress, B-vitamin

deficiency is almost assured without supplementation. Dr. ston

says:

> " Cancer having a particular affinity for the rectal and intestinal

tract may be caused by a systemic deficiency, lowering the resistance

to a point where the degenerative process begins. Vitamin

deficiencies may be a factor worthy of consideration in infections,

degenerations, and malignancies...The diet should contain quantities

of fresh vegetables, eaten as nearly in the natural state as possible

and few refined foods should be allowed in the regimen. Concentrates

of the vitamins are a valuable aid in correcting the acute stage in

which the patient is found when symptoms develop...I have had very

good results in a number of patients on a group vitamin concentrate

tablet with all the vitamins present. This is effective and is not

too expensive to the patient. It behooves every medical man to study

and observe the merits of vitamin therapy. " (p. 48)

> This is nature-cure. Here is a doctor who researches vitamins,

tries vitamins, and cures with vitamins. Here's a doctor who

prescribes whole, raw, natural foods, and discourages refined foods.

Yet there are so few medical doctors who hear what he's saying, and

fewer still who try the effective, natural approach with their

patients. This is another reason why you have to be your own doctor:

to make sure you and your family have the advantage of such

knowledge, you may have to apply it yourself. Then you decide.

> B-complex vitamins and heart disease are discussed in a 1934 paper

entitled " Maintenance Nutrition in the Pigeon and its Relation to

Heart Block " by Cyril W. of Oxford University. The graphs

shown are particularly interesting. B-vitamin deficiency seems to

actually cause heart trouble, because B-vitamins actually cured it.

In one case, an eight-week long heart block was cured in four days

with B-vitamins; this was with a person, not a pigeon. The same

white rice, white flour diet that made experimental pigeons sick also

makes people sick. Whole grain foods (and not just naturally titled,

dark colored white flour breads and cereals) can reverse illnesses

and prevent illnesses.

> Ever since Dr. Linus ing began publicizing the value of

megadoses of vitamin C in the early 1970's, there has been an

undertone of medical suspicion that vitamin C may cause kidney

stones. Kidney stones (what doctors call " renal calculi " ) can be

cured by vitamin C, says Dr. J. McCormick, M.D., of Toronto,

Canada. One among his many excellent papers appeared way back in

1946 in Medical Record, stating the following:

> " I have observed that a cloudy urine, heavy with phosphates and

epithelium, is generally associated with a low vitamin C status, as

determined by titration with dichlorophenal-indophenol (Hoffmann-

LaRoche); and that as soon as corrective administration of the

vitamin effects a normal ascorbic acid (vitamin C) level the

crystalline and organic sediment disappears like magic from the

urine. I have found that this change can usually be brought about in

a matter of hours by large doses of the vitamin, 500 to 2,000 mg,

oral or parenteral. " (p. 411)

> This sediment or crystalline matter in the urine is what makes up

kidney stones. Please also note that 500 to 2,000 mg is much more

than the U.S. Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) for vitamin C of 60

mg/day. The U.S. RDA is not enough vitamin C. Dr. McCormick clearly

indicates the need for large quantities of this vitamin, not just a

daily drink of orange juice.

> In what might be seen as a display of almost too much therapeutic

versatility, Dr. McCormick also found that calcareous deposits of the

eye and cornea " may be cleared away in a few days by correction of

vitamin C status, and I find also that dental calculus (tartar on the

teeth), which lays the foundation for so much dental havoc, can be

quickly suppressed and prevented by an adequate intake of vitamin

C. "

> With vitamin C, " adequate " means abundant. Americans do not get

abundant amounts of any vitamin in their fast-food, convenience

food, sugar-laden, meat-and-starch, over-cooked diet. They certainly

do not get much, if any, vitamin C. Dr. McCormick believed, and not

alone, that nine out of ten people in this country are vitamin C

deficient. In a 1954 paper, " Intervertebral-Disc Lesions: A New

Etiological Concept " printed in Archives of Pediatrics, Dr. McCormick

says:

> " It would seem almost unbelievable that in this day and age, when

fresh fruits and vegetables are so plentiful, any of our population

should be found deficient in vitamin C; but during the last fifteen

years of the writer's practice as a nutritionist, more than 5,000

qualitative chemical tests for vitamin C status in clinical cases

have been made, and less than ten percent of adult subjects have been

found to be at optimal level in this respect. The writer has found,

in clinical and laboratory research, that the smoking of one

cigarette neutralizes in the body approximately 25 mg. of ascorbic

acid, or the equivalent of the vitamin C content of one average-

size orange. On this basis, the ability of the heavy smoker to

maintain normal vitamin C status from dietary sources is obviously

questionable, and this alone may account for the prevalence of

vitamin C deficiency in our modern adult population. " (p. 32-33)

> Note that Dr. McCormick said this in 1954, at a time when

physicians were literally endorsing cigarettes in magazines and on TV

commercials.

> It is important to keep in mind that non-smokers are subjected to

cigarette smoke also, in homes and public places, and that air

pollutants and stress also cause the body to lose quantities of

vitamin C.

> Can this widespread deficiency of vitamin C be behind more than

just kidney stones? Dr. McCormick says yes, for he thinks that

calculi in other parts of the body can be cleared up by plenty of

vitamin C, including those in the biliary tract (gallstones), the

pancreas, tonsils, appendix, mammary glands, uterus, ovaries,

prostate and " even the calcareous deposits in arteriosclerosis. "

Think of the surgery that could be avoided here.

> This is just the beginning. In his series of papers, Dr.

McCormick further demonstrated that vitamin C deficiency is the

essential cause of numerous communicable illnesses. Let's

consider " The Changing Incidence and Mortality of Infectious Disease

in Relation to Changed Trends in Nutrition " from Medical Record,

September 1947. Citing mortality tables as early as 1840, it is

shown that tuberculosis, pneumonia, diphtheria, scarlet fever,

whooping cough, rheumatic fever, typhoid fever and more are due to

vitamin C deficiency brought about by poor nutrition. It is shown

in graphs that the mortality rate for these diseases decreased over

the years regardless of immunization, inoculation or medication. The

rate of decline in death rate for almost every disease cited was

about as fast before immunization as it was after immunization.

Public health records show that by the time inoculations became

available, few people were dying of these diseases anyway. Dr.

H. Hillemann (1960) drew similar conclusions in " The Illusion

of American Health and Longevity " published in Clinical Physiology.

He showed that polio was already almost eliminated before polio

vaccine was available.

> Vitamin C seems to be especially important. Perhaps we can see a

lack of vitamin C as the basic cause of kidney stones and such, but

what of plentiful supply of vitamin C as the basic cure for the named

infectious diseases? Can we say that disease trends in history might

be understood as waves of lack of, or waves of abundant intake of

vitamin C? Apparently we can.

> Dr. McCormick explains vitamin C's properties and says that " by

reason of its chemical action as a reducing agent, and sometimes as

an oxidizing agent, vitamin C is also a specific antagonist of

chemical and bacterial toxins. " Furthermore, in " Ascorbic Acid as a

Chemotherapeutic Agent " (McCormick, 1952) he states:

> " Vitamin C is known to play an essential part in the oxidation-

reduction system of tissue respiration and to contribute to the

development of antibodies and the neutralization of toxins in the

building of natural immunity to infectious diseases. There is a very

potent chemotherapeutic action of ascorbic acid when given in massive

repeated doses, 500 to 1,000 mg. (hourly), preferably intravenously

or intramuscularly. When thus administered the effect in acute

infectious processes is favorably comparable to that of the

sulfonamides or the mycelial antibiotics, but with the great

advantage of complete freedom from toxic or allergic reactions. " (p.

151)

> There is increasing evidence that vitamin C in large, frequent

doses can effect cure of what are usually called infectious

diseases. To establish that these diseases are actually vitamin C

deficiency diseases, though, we should be able to prevent them by

regular, abundant supply of the vitamin. This is exactly what can be

done. Dr. McCormick states:

> " Once the acute febrile or toxic stage of an infectious disease is

brought under control by massive ascorbic acid administration, a

relatively small maintenance dose of the vitamin will be adequate in

most cases to prevent relapses, just as in fire protection small

chemical extinguishers may be adequate to prevent fires in their

incipiency, whereas when large fires have developed, water from large

high-pressure fire hoses becomes necessary. " (p. 152)

> Here is an excellent example of preventive health care, and very

powerful prevention at that, by using a vitamin. Vitamin C isn't

just for colds any more. We're talking here of nothing less than the

cure and prevention of serious illness with a vitamin that anyone can

buy and take on their own.

> And we're not going to stop there. We're going to take on the

biggest killers of modern times: heart disease and cancer. Can they

be conquered? Consider this summary of facts brought out by Dr.

McCormick in the papers cited above, and from " Coronary Thrombosis: A

New Concept of Mechanism and Etiology " (McCormick, 1957):

> 1.) Four out of five coronary cases in hospitals show vitamin C

deficiency.

> 2.) Cancer patients have vitamin C deficiency averaging 4,500 mg.

> 3.) Smoking is known to predispose a body for cancer and heart

disease; smoking is also known to rob the body of its vitamin C.

> 4.) The symptoms of classic vitamin C deficiency disease, called

scurvy, are identical with the symptoms of some types of leukemia

and other forms cancer.

> Scurvy is generally supposed to be extinct. Yet cancer is all too

prevalent today, and the signs in development of cancer and scurvy

are similar. Can they be the same disease under different names?

In " Have We Forgotten the Lesson of Scurvy " (1962), Dr. McCormick

reviews the literature in this regard:

> " As long ago as 1609, i cited by (scurvy research pioneer)

Lind stated that scurvy is nearly allied to the plague, as it

occasions carbuncles, buboes and cancer. In an effort to clarify this

relationship we published two papers in which we advanced the

hypothesis that deficiency of vitamin C, by bringing about

disintegration of epithelial and connective tissue relationships,

owing to liquefaction of the intercellular cement substance collagen)

and disintegration of the connective tissue of the basement membrane,

results in breakdown of orderly cellular arrangement, thus acting as

a prelude to cancer. " (p. 5)

> After citing the work of eleven more researchers, Dr. McCormick

says:

> " Our major effort should be directed toward prevention of the cause

of the cellular disarrangement - collagenous breakdown of epithelial

and subepithelial connective tissues - as manifested in open sores or

fissures that fail to heal readily, and unusual or easily produced

hemorrhage. Such lesions may be early warning signs of future

cancer. They likewise are early signs of scurvy. " (p. 10)

> He also cites a description of leukemia from a 1905 edition of

Northnagel's Encyclopedia of Practical Medicine which, curiously

enough, equated leukemia and scurvy.

> In short, we may be a nation suffering from a scurvy epidemic

under the current name of cancer. The symptoms, progress and results

of the two diseases are the same: the cause is the same (vitamin C

deficiency); the treatment of each is the same: vitamin C in large

quantity. If all this is true, then cancer patients should get

better when treated with large doses of " C. "

> They do. Dr. Linus ing (1976, 1986), Nobel prize-winning

chemist, researcher, and author collaborated with cancer surgeon Ewan

Cameron, M.D. (1973, 1993) in directing the treatment of patients

with very great quantities of vitamin C with very great results. An

undated letter in my possession from the Linus ing Institute

says:

> " Our work on nutrition and cancer, in collaboration with Vale of

Leven Hospital in Scotland, is showing significant promise. We

recently reported that daily ingestion of 10 grams (10,000 mg.) or

more of vitamin C extends and improves the quality of life of

patients with terminal cancer. These studies, published in the

October, 1976 issue of The Proceedings of The National Academy of

Sciences, are based on a comparison of 100 patients with advanced

cancer who received 10 grams of sodium ascorbate (vitamin C) per day -

and 1,000 other patients, ten matched controls for each of the

ascorbate-treated patients (same kind of cancer, same age, same

sex). The 1,000 control patients were given the same treatment as

the ascorbate-treated patients except they did not receive vitamin

C. The ascorbate-treated patients have lived, on the average, over

five times as long as the matched control patients. Although all

1,000 controls have died, thirteen of the 100 ascorbate-treated

patients are still alive and seem to be free of the disease. "

> Thirteen out of one hundred may not seem like a staggering number,

but that would have been 130 out of a thousand, or 130,000 out of a

million. Also bear in mind that Ivan Illich says in Medical Nemesis

(1977) that there is no significant increase in survival rate for

most cancer patients with conventional medical or surgical treatment.

The five year survival rate for most cancer patients is unaffected by

any medical therapy; it is the same whether they are treated or not.

With vitamin C, we appear to have what may be, statistically, the

most effective known cure for cancer. " Dr. ing believes that the

death rate from cancer in the United States can fall from twenty per

cent of all deaths to only two percent, " says the Institute.

> What vitamin researchers seem to keep finding is that if a

deficiency of one or more vitamins causes a disease, the plentiful

administration of that same vitamin or vitamins will cure the

disease. That makes sense. More important, this theory is proven by

its clinical success. Surely that's the best part of any research:

when it works, when people get well.

> One of the functions of vitamin C, in addition to keeping your

cells together, is to maximize " the oxygen-carrying capacity of red

(blood) cells so the heart is called upon to do much less work, " says

Dr. Royal Lee in the undated pamphlet " Clinical Nutrition: Food vs.

Drugs. " It is interesting that vitamin E has a similar effect: it

increases oxygen availability to the heart. If that's true, one

might expect vitamin E deficiency to cause heart trouble. Evidently

it does, and " 122 independent reports have been published in the

world's medical journals in support of vitamin E " according to an

uncredited article in Popular Science Digest... from 1953!

> Wilfrid and Evan Shute, both medical doctors, with Dr. Arthur

Vogelsang, traced a national vitamin E deficiency back to the turn of

the century when the milling of flour and consumption of this and

other refined foods increased greatly. They saw an increase of heart

disease parallel the increase of refined foods. In Coronet there

appeared an article by J. D. Ratcliff (1948) entitled " For Heart

Disease: Vitamin E " that described this work.

> " The Shutes and Vogelsang note that heart disease is almost unknown

among primitive peoples - until they start eating civilized man's

food. Further, they emphasize that in 1910 - before our national

diet had become too refined - heart disease was the fourth cause of

death instead of the first as it is today (1948); and that the rate

of heart deaths is up 250 per cent in this period. " (p. 31)

> The Shutes described this phenomenon in their books, particularly

in Vitamin E for Ailing and Healthy Hearts (1969). The more refined,

de-natured foods eaten, the more heart disease. And what is refined

out? Among other things, the vitamin E that helps keep the heart

prospering, and you alive.

> Since the 1940's, cardiovascular disease has continued to be our

biggest killer disease. But also since then, certain doctors have

treated tens of thousands of coronary patients with vitamin E. Drs.

Wilfrid and Evan Shute have personally supervised vitamin E therapy

for over 30,000 heart patients, making them the world's most

experienced cardiologists. You would think that the medical

profession would be most enthusiastic about their success with

vitamin therapy.

> That has not been the case. The Canadian, British, and American

Medical Associations have not voiced serious support for vitamin E

against heart disease. Why not? " The Fight Over Vitamin E " (Hutton,

1953) discusses the early stages of the controversy in detail. The

article also expands on vitamin E's therapeutic uses:

> " The Shutes' theory about vitamin E is this: it is not specifically

a heart medication... The chief effect of vitamin E is to reduce the

amount of oxygen which the cells and tissues of the body and its

organs require for efficient, healthy functioning. Heart diseases

happen to be the most dramatic example of the result of vitamin E

deprivation, and vitamin E's effect, simply stated, is to condition

the tissues involved so that they are able to function normally, or

at any rate to survive, on the greatly reduced amount of oxygen

available to them when a coronary clot cuts down the oxygen-bearing

blood supply reaching them. The Shutes' and other investigators

claim it is effective in a wide variety of other conditions: burns,

wounds, radiation damage, gangrene, ulceration, phlebitis... diabetes

and its complications, nephritis, eye diseases, psychoses, post-

surgical shock, plastic surgery and post-poliomyelitis. " (p. 4)

> Much controversy comes out of the wide application that these

scientists claim for vitamin E. However: A nutritional substance

that cures many ills is a substance whose deficiency causes many

ills. This is the case with any vitamin deficiency: the deficiency

of one vitamin may show up as many different disease symptoms. One

person lacking in vitamin E may develop arteriosclerosis; another may

develop diabetic gangrene; another might just have poor skin; another

might drop dead of heart attack. This is because a vitamin is

important for the entire organism, in all its organs and functions.

No vitamin works just in or for the heart or any one sector. Each

vitamin is essential to total body health, and all the vitamins

collectively are needed for freedom from disease.

> Copyright C 1999 and prior years W. Saul. From the books

DOCTOR YOURSELF, QUACK DOCTOR and PAPERBACK CLINIC, available from

Dr. Saul, Number 8 Van Buren Street, Holley, New York 14470.

>

>

>

> Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc.

>

> To subscribe, e-mail to: Gettingwell-subscribe@y...

> Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell

>