Guest guest Posted January 28, 2008 Report Share Posted January 28, 2008 The reports for hormone related breast cancer and CCFO are also sketchy. I think alternatives and lifestyle changes are essential in dealing with cancer. But, one of the most important things is to recognize that not all cancers are the same. To tell someone to use a protocol that might not be for their cancer, is dangerous. It's my personal opinion that Budwig may work well for non-hormonal cancers, but so far, I can't see how it would work for those cancers related to hormones. ar -- Arlyn Grant arlynsg@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2008 Report Share Posted January 28, 2008 Hi, I found the summary of an article below quite interesting. It seems to indicate that Omega 3 can have a protective effect in the case of breast cancer, though in this case it was not Omega 3 derived from ALA (as in flaxseed oil) but Omega 3 from DHA and EPA in fish oil. Now, your body *can* convert EPA from ALA, but it would take an awful lot of the stuff to do so. I read that to obtain roughly 1 gram of EPA, you would have to ingest 11 grams of flaxseed oil. Interesting, too, is that the site from which I gathered the info below has a lot of articles to indicate that the Omega 3 from fish oil (EPA and DHA) have a really protective effect on prostate cancer. See: http://www.oilofpisces.com/prostatecancer.html Marti Fats and breast cancer MILAN, ITALY. The association between the intake of various fats and oils and the risk of breast cancer has been the subject of several studies. There is still no real consensus as to which fats are beneficial and which are not. The evidence for a protective role of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), the main components of fish oils, is probably the strongest. Researchers at the Italian National Cancer Institute have just completed an investigation aimed at clarifying the association between fat intake and breast cancer risk. A total of 4052 postmenopausal women were followed for an average of 5.5 years. During this time 71 cases of invasive breast cancer were diagnosed. The cancer patients were matched with 141 controls. All study participants had blood samples drawn and red blood cell (erythrocyte) membranes were analyzed for their fatty acid content. The researchers point out that erythrocyte membranes are good biomarkers for not only dietary fat intake, but also for other dietary and hormonal factors. Women with DHA concentrations in the highest tertile had less than half the risk of breast cancer than did women in the lowest tertile. Polyunsaturated fatty acids overall were also protective with omega-3 acids being somewhat more protective than omega-6 acids. Saturated fatty acid concentrations were not significantly related to breast cancer risk. A higher concentration of monounsaturated fats, especially oleic acid, was associated with a significantly increased risk. The researchers point out that most oleic acid in mammalian tissue is derived from saturated stearic acid through a process involving the enzyme delta 9-desaturase. Saturated fatty acids, cholesterol, carbohydrates, insulin, testosterone, and estrogen all activate this enzyme whereas dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and fasting deactivate it. The researchers conclude that the delta 9-desaturase enzyme may be an important link between breast cancer risk and dietary fat consumption and urge further research in the field. Pala, Valeria, et al. Erythrocyte membrane fatty acids and subsequent breast cancer: a prospective Italian study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 93, July 18, 2001, pp. 1088-95 >The reports for hormone related breast cancer and CCFO are also sketchy. I think alternatives and lifestyle changes are essential in dealing with cancer. But, one of the most important things is to recognize that not all cancers are the same. To tell someone to use a protocol that might not be for their cancer, is dangerous. It's my personal opinion that Budwig may work well for non-hormonal cancers, but so far, I can't see how it would work for those cancers related to hormones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2008 Report Share Posted January 28, 2008 On Jan 28, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Arlyn Grant wrote: > The reports for hormone related breast cancer and CCFO are also > sketchy. I think alternatives and lifestyle changes are essential in > dealing with cancer. But, one of the most important things is to > recognize that not all cancers are the same. To tell someone to use a > protocol that might not be for their cancer, is dangerous. It's my > personal opinion that Budwig may work well for non-hormonal cancers, > but so far, I can't see how it would work for those cancers related to > hormones. > Arlene- I couldn't find my email about the estrogens in flaxseed being weak but when they occupy the estrogen receptor sites in cells, they block the stronger estrogens from being taken up that are actually capable of making the cancer cells grow. But here is an article that would back up that claim. It is about the seeds, not the oil. The Budwig diet would use a much higher amount of seeds than in this study. http://www.world-wire.com/news/0729050001.html FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ONE FLAX SEED MUFFIN A DAY FOR 30 DAYS KILLS 31% OF BREAST CANCER CELLS IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED WOMEN EL VERANO, CA, July 29, 2005 --/WORLD-WIRE/-- Linseed oil, made from flax seeds, is an extremely useful natural oil that is used as a preservative for wood, concrete, and as an ingredient in the manufacture of paints, varnishes and stains. Little did anyone realize that the discarded flax meal was a powerful therapeutic food for the treatment of breast and other cancers. The role of flax seed lignans as a treatment for cancer has been studied in cell cultures and animals for years, but until a few months ago it has never been tested in humans with diagnosed cancers. Canadian scientists, following up on previous studies conducted in mice, enrolled women newly diagnosed with breast cancer as volunteers to study the effects of flaxseed on breast cancer progression. In this study, one flaxseed muffin a day, containing a predetermined concentration of pre-lignans, was consumed per day for 30 days. Tissue biopsies were preformed prior to and after the 30 day period. The results showed that the flaxseed pre-lignans, converted in the intestines by bacteria into powerful anti-cancer lignans, were extremely efficient, in low doses, in killing the breast cancer cells in these volunteer women. The results were nothing short of dramatic. The growth index in the cancer cells was reduced 34.2%, while the level of programmed cell death increased 30.7%. Women who expressed the HER2 (c-erbB2) metastatic oncogene saw its expression decrease by a dramatic 71%. According to Dr. , Chief Scientist of Grouppe Kurosawa, data like this has never been reported before. “This study is critically important not only for breast cancer patients, but for all cancer patients because lignans kill many kinds of cancers, including the presently incurable melanoma. With the exception of palmitic acid, the common saturated fatty acid, specific foods do not normally have the ability to kill cancer cells. And we are only talking about one muffin a day. What if we ate two? This study is so exciting that it has me jumping out of my skin. This study and parallel studies are too important for the public health to be ignored so we decided to send out a press release.” The World Health Organization estimates that 1.2 million women will develop breast cancer in 2004. Since many of these women lack adequate medical care, they will eventually die from this disease. In the US, a country with unlimited medical resources, 211,240 women will develop breast cancer in 2005, and 40,410 will die. African American women in the US are particularly prone to develop and die from this cancer. Medical costs are out of control in the US and throughout the world. Natural medicines such as lignans are cheap, non-toxic, effective in low doses, and the only hope for those without health insurance. Anyone can grind up flaxseed and put it in muffins, smoothies, yogurt or animal food. The idea that this simple seed can actually kill cancer cells in the human/animal body is almost overwhelming in its implications for human and animal health. Grouppe Kurosawa, an organization dedicated to developing treatment protocols for acute and chronic diseases using only natural medicines and over the counter drugs, has compiled the information on lignans and cancer into the Medicinal Nutrition folder on its web site. The folder contains hyperlinked scientific references, and flax meal recipes so people can investigate the medicinal powers of flaxseed on their own. Visit: http://www.grouppekurosawa.com/nutrition.htm CONTACT: , Ph.D Grouppe Kurosawa 707-9961747 scorpiongrouppe@... http://www.grouppekurosawa.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 Hi , The article you posted does not indicate if the women who had positive flax seed results had hormone positive cancer. I used a flax seed product for over a year, daily, just prior to my diagnosis. I still got breast cancer. ar On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:00:07 -0800, " Tad Winiecki " <winiecki@...> said: > > On Jan 28, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Arlyn Grant wrote: > > > The reports for hormone related breast cancer and CCFO are also > > sketchy. I think alternatives and lifestyle changes are essential in > > dealing with cancer. But, one of the most important things is to > > recognize that not all cancers are the same. To tell someone to use a > > protocol that might not be for their cancer, is dangerous. It's my > > personal opinion that Budwig may work well for non-hormonal cancers, > > but so far, I can't see how it would work for those cancers related to > > hormones. > > > > Arlene- I couldn't find my email about the estrogens in flaxseed being > weak but when they occupy the estrogen receptor sites in cells, they > block the stronger estrogens from being taken up that are actually > capable of making the cancer cells grow. But here is an article that > would back up that claim. It is about the seeds, not the oil. The > Budwig diet would use a much higher amount of seeds than in this study. > > http://www.world-wire.com/news/0729050001.html > > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE > > ONE FLAX SEED MUFFIN A DAY FOR 30 DAYS KILLS 31% OF BREAST CANCER CELLS > IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED WOMEN > > EL VERANO, CA, July 29, 2005 --/WORLD-WIRE/-- Linseed oil, made from > flax seeds, is an extremely useful natural oil that is used as a > preservative for wood, concrete, and as an ingredient in the > manufacture of paints, varnishes and stains. Little did anyone realize > that the discarded flax meal was a powerful therapeutic food for the > treatment of breast and other cancers. > > The role of flax seed lignans as a treatment for cancer has been > studied in cell cultures and animals for years, but until a few months > ago it has never been tested in humans with diagnosed cancers. > > Canadian scientists, following up on previous studies conducted in > mice, enrolled women newly diagnosed with breast cancer as volunteers > to study the effects of flaxseed on breast cancer progression. In this > study, one flaxseed muffin a day, containing a predetermined > concentration of pre-lignans, was consumed per day for 30 days. Tissue > biopsies were preformed prior to and after the 30 day period. The > results showed that the flaxseed pre-lignans, converted in the > intestines by bacteria into powerful anti-cancer lignans, were > extremely efficient, in low doses, in killing the breast cancer cells > in these volunteer women. > > The results were nothing short of dramatic. The growth index in the > cancer cells was reduced 34.2%, while the level of programmed cell > death increased 30.7%. Women who expressed the HER2 (c-erbB2) > metastatic oncogene saw its expression decrease by a dramatic 71%. > > According to Dr. , Chief Scientist of Grouppe Kurosawa, > data like this has never been reported before. > > & #8220;This study is critically important not only for breast cancer > patients, but for all cancer patients because lignans kill many kinds > of cancers, including the presently incurable melanoma. With the > exception of palmitic acid, the common saturated fatty acid, specific > foods do not normally have the ability to kill cancer cells. And we are > only talking about one muffin a day. What if we ate two? This study is > so exciting that it has me jumping out of my skin. This study and > parallel studies are too important for the public health to be ignored > so we decided to send out a press release. & #8221; > > The World Health Organization estimates that 1.2 million women will > develop breast cancer in 2004. Since many of these women lack adequate > medical care, they will eventually die from this disease. In the US, a > country with unlimited medical resources, 211,240 women will develop > breast cancer in 2005, and 40,410 will die. African American women in > the US are particularly prone to develop and die from this cancer. > > Medical costs are out of control in the US and throughout the world. > Natural medicines such as lignans are cheap, non-toxic, effective in > low doses, and the only hope for those without health insurance. Anyone > can grind up flaxseed and put it in muffins, smoothies, yogurt or > animal food. The idea that this simple seed can actually kill cancer > cells in the human/animal body is almost overwhelming in its > implications for human and animal health. > > Grouppe Kurosawa, an organization dedicated to developing treatment > protocols for acute and chronic diseases using only natural medicines > and over the counter drugs, has compiled the information on lignans and > cancer into the Medicinal Nutrition folder on its web site. > > The folder contains hyperlinked scientific references, and flax meal > recipes so people can investigate the medicinal powers of flaxseed on > their own. Visit: http://www.grouppekurosawa.com/nutrition.htm > > CONTACT: > , Ph.D > Grouppe Kurosawa > 707-9961747 > scorpiongrouppe@... > http://www.grouppekurosawa.com/ > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 On Jan 28, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Arlyn Grant wrote: > Hi , > > The article you posted does not indicate if the women who had positive > flax seed results had hormone positive cancer. > > I used a flax seed product for over a year, daily, just prior to my > diagnosis. I still got breast cancer. > Here's another study I just saw today. It talks about relative risks and percents. Also, how long does the tumor grow before it is detectable? Perhaps several years. It's sad that the flaxseed product you used didn't eliminate the cancer. I'm very new with the Budwig diet myself, don't have a cancer dx as far as I know. There are a lot of other alternative treatments out there, Essiac, various herbs, LDN, Paw Paw, etc. I've been using herbs for 15 years for health and prevention. I do seem to find some good health benefits from the BP so far though. Dr. Budwig was concerned about processing damaging fish oils but if they were processed to maintain quality then they would be another source of good omega 3's. An important consideration is not just about omega 3's but what the ratio of omega 6's to 3's is in one's diet. I've read that it can be as high as 10-30 : 1 when It should be more like 2:1. The second study below talks about the bad effect of high omega 6's in the diet. It's hard to get a good omega 3 balance without Flaxseed oil as most oils are high in omega 6's. OTOH fish oils have the EPA and DHA already in a useable form. I believe stearic acid is found in meat, particularly beef, haven't looked it up. LA is the omega 6 essential fatty acid found in most vegetable oils, nuts, and some meats, especially chicken. http://www.oilofpisces.com/prostatecancer.html -------------------------------------- Fats and breast cancer MILAN, ITALY. The association between the intake of various fats and oils and the risk of breast cancer has been the subject of several studies. There is still no real consensus as to which fats are beneficial and which are not. The evidence for a protective role of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), the main components of fish oils, is probably the strongest. Researchers at the Italian National Cancer Institute have just completed an investigation aimed at clarifying the association between fat intake and breast cancer risk. A total of 4052 postmenopausal women were followed for an average of 5.5 years. During this time 71 cases of invasive breast cancer were diagnosed. The cancer patients were matched with 141 controls. All study participants had blood samples drawn and red blood cell (erythrocyte) membranes were analyzed for their fatty acid content. The researchers point out that erythrocyte membranes are good biomarkers for not only dietary fat intake, but also for other dietary and hormonal factors. Women with DHA concentrations in the highest tertile had less than half the risk of breast cancer than did women in the lowest tertile. Polyunsaturated fatty acids overall were also protective with omega-3 acids being somewhat more protective than omega-6 acids. Saturated fatty acid concentrations were not significantly related to breast cancer risk. A higher concentration of monounsaturated fats, especially oleic acid, was associated with a significantly increased risk. The researchers point out that most oleic acid in mammalian tissue is derived from saturated stearic acid through a process involving the enzyme delta 9-desaturase. Saturated fatty acids, cholesterol, carbohydrates, insulin, testosterone, and estrogen all activate this enzyme whereas dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and fasting deactivate it. The researchers conclude that the delta 9-desaturase enzyme may be an important link between breast cancer risk and dietary fat consumption and urge further research in the field. Pala, Valeria, et al. Erythrocyte membrane fatty acids and subsequent breast cancer: a prospective Italian study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 93, July 18, 2001, pp. 1088-95 ------------------------------- Breast cancer risk linked to fatty acid profile CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA. Breast cancer rates differ greatly between countries. They are 5 times higher in the United States than in Japan and twice as high in France as in neighbouring Spain. Differences in overall fat consumption in these countries have been extensively studied, but no link to breast cancer incidence has been detected so far. A large team of researchers from the Netherlands, Ireland, Spain, Finland, Switzerland, Germany and the United States now report that, while overall fat consumption may not be significant, the make-up of the fats could be. As part of the large EURAMIC Study the researchers investigated the link between the content of polyunsaturated fats in adipose (fat) tissue of postmenopausal women and breast cancer incidence. A total of 291 women with breast cancer and 351 controls were included in the study which involved 5 European medical centers. The women all had samples of adipose tissue taken (from the buttocks) and analyzed to determine the concentration of the main polyunsaturated fatty acids: the omega-3 acids - alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and the omega-6 acids - linoleic acid (LA) and its metabolite arachidonic acid (AA). The study found no significant correlation between omega-3 fatty acid levels and breast cancer incidence, but did find a trend to increasing incidence with increasing levels of omega-6 fatty acids in the adipose tissue samples. The researchers also found a significant association between the ratio of EPA and DHA to LA levels and breast cancer incidence in 4 out of 5 of the medical centers involved in the study. Pooling all results showed that women with the highest ratio had a 35% lower breast cancer incidence than women with the lowest ratio. In other words, women with a relatively high adipose tissue level of EPA and DHA (the main components of fish oils) and a relatively low level of LA and its metabolites had a lower breast cancer risk. The researchers note that LA (linoleic acid) is the precursor of certain eicosanoids which may promote tumour growth. EPA and DHA inhibit the production of these harmful compounds and may also, on their own, inhibit tumour growth. The researchers also point out that several epidemiological studies have found an inverse correlation between fish consumption and breast cancer incidence and urge further studies to determine the relationship between the dietary intake of specific fatty acids and breast cancer risk. Simonsen, Neal, et al. Adipose tissue omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acid content and breast cancer in the EURAMIC Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 147, No. 4, 1998, pp. 342-52 ----------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.