Guest guest Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 WBC10.1 Neutrophilis 79 Lymphs 16 monos 5 eos0 baso 0 neutrophils 7.96 lymphs 1.61 all Others were normal My question is if this indicates bacterial infection or dying of cancer tumor. Will I need antibiodics to clean up the dying debree? Thanks for any insight. Vic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 Tumor die-off is sometimes apparent from bloodwork if the tumor load is large and the die-off rapid. You get more info from the blood chemistry rather than the CBC as you want to look for hyperkalemia and azotemia. Antibiotics are useless for this. _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Victor Swiercz Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 7:51 AM Subject: Re: [ ] Question about blood test. WBC10.1 Neutrophilis 79 Lymphs16 monos 5 eos0 baso0 neutrophils 7.96 lymphs 1.61 all Others were normal My question is if this indicates bacterial infection or dying of cancer tumor. Will I need antibiodics to clean up the dying debree? Thanks for any insight. Vic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 , Thank you for your kind response. Here are the test: EGFR 115 (normal no normal values given on EGFR Comp Metabloic Panel sodium 143 potasium 4.2 chloride 108*** high (98-106) co2 content 28 bun 14 creatinine\0 .54 glucose\91\ calcium \ 9.6 protin total serum 6.9 albumin\ 4.1 bilirubin adult tot.\0.3 alk phosphatase \ 80 sgot (ast)\ 19 Sgpt (alt)\ 19 The platelet count is high. 607 \ I am not sure these are the test that you needed to determine if there is a bacterial infection or just massive tumor die off. I am running a fever 100-100.6. I have only slight pain in the area of the tumor. The tumor is 6 inches long and is most likely a uterine sarcoma. Thank you for your comments. \ If you could comment on these as well and explain hyperkalemia and azotemia in laymans terms for a good friend. Vic \ ________________________________ From: Gammill <vgammill@...> Sent: Fri, March 25, 2011 11:32:34 AM Subject: RE: [ ] Question about blood test.  Tumor die-off is sometimes apparent from bloodwork if the tumor load is large and the die-off rapid. You get more info from the blood chemistry  rather than the CBC as you want to look for hyperkalemia and azotemia. Antibiotics are useless for this. _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Victor Swiercz Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 7:51 AM Subject: Re: [ ] Question about blood test. WBC10.1 Neutrophilis 79 Lymphs16 monos 5 eos0 baso0 neutrophils 7.96 lymphs 1.61 all Others were normal My question is if this indicates bacterial infection or dying of cancer tumor. Will I need antibiodics to clean up the dying debree? Thanks for any insight. Vic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 hi Vic, It's like your fighting some kind of infection. what does your doctor say? Neutrophilis 79 - normal 40 to 72 so white blood cell a bit high but it will be if it's been an fighting infection Lymph normal % range returns protein and excess interstitial fluid to the circulation. Lymph picks up bacteria and brings them to lymph nodes to be destroyed. metastatic cells can also be transported via lymph. Lymph also transports fats from the digestive system. baso or Basophils are gone or use up. Basophils are part of your imune system that normally protects your body from infection, but can also be partly responsible for your asthma symtoms. Basophils are a type of white blood cell that are involved in inflammatory reactions in your body, especially those related to allergies and asthma. When stimulated, basophils release histamine and other enzymes that can lead to inflammation, bronchoconstriction, and asthma symptoms. When you are exposed to allergens such as molds or animal dander an lgE antibody binds to the allergen and stimulates the basophils to release histamine. Classic asthma symptoms follow the release of histamine. Eos is 0 as An increased number of eosinophils in the blood (eosinophilia) usually indicates the response of the body to abnormal cells, parasites, or substances Baso,is O - Basophil are RBC, Red Blood Cell, they Decreased with anemia; increased when too many made and with fluid loss due to diarrhea, dehydration, burns ect neutrophils 7.96 I wont go into nitrite/nitrate plasma levels or on neutrophil and platelet adhesion as it will just take me to long lymphs 1.61 I wont go in to have you have had radiation? this may indcate DNA damage ________________________________ From: Victor Swiercz <roadmst1@...> Sent: Sat, 26 March, 2011 WBC10.1 Neutrophilis 79 Lymphs 16 monos 5 eos0 baso 0 neutrophils 7.96 lymphs 1.61 all Others were normal My question is if this indicates bacterial infection or dying of cancer tumor. Will I need antibiodics to clean up the dying debree? Thanks for any insight. Vic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 There is no evidence of die-off from the blood chemistry. Hyperkalemia = high serum levels of potassium Azotemia = high serum levels of nitrogen containing compounds such as urea Her temperature should be monitored. If it continues she might want to culture her blood. _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Victor Swiercz Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 11:05 AM Subject: Re: [ ] Question about blood test. , Thank you for your kind response. Here are the test: EGFR 115 (normal no normal values given on EGFR Comp Metabloic Panel sodium 143 potasium 4.2 chloride 108*** high (98-106) co2 content28 bun14 creatinine\0 .54 glucose\91\ calcium \9.6 protin total serum 6.9 albumin\ 4.1 bilirubin adult tot.\0.3 alk phosphatase \ 80 sgot (ast)\ 19 Sgpt (alt)\ 19 The platelet count is high. 607 \ I am not sure these are the test that you needed to determine if there is a bacterial infection or just massive tumor die off. I am running a fever 100-100.6. I have only slight pain in the area of the tumor. The tumor is 6 inches long and is most likely a uterine sarcoma. Thank you foryour comments. \ If you could comment on these as well and explain hyperkalemia and azotemia in laymans terms for a good friend. Vic \ ________________________________ From: Gammill <vgammill@... <mailto:vgammill%40roadrunner.com> > <mailto: %40> Sent: Fri, March 25, 2011 11:32:34 AM Subject: RE: [ ] Question about blood test. Tumor die-off is sometimes apparent from bloodwork if the tumor load is large and the die-off rapid. You get more info from the blood chemistry rather than the CBC as you want to look for hyperkalemia and azotemia. Antibiotics are useless for this. _____ From: <mailto: %40> [mailto: <mailto: %40> ] On Behalf Of Victor Swiercz Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 7:51 AM <mailto: %40> Subject: Re: [ ] Question about blood test. WBC10.1 Neutrophilis 79 Lymphs16 monos 5 eos0 baso0 neutrophils 7.96 lymphs 1.61 all Others were normal My question is if this indicates bacterial infection or dying of cancer tumor. Will I need antibiodics to clean up the dying debree? Thanks for any insight. Vic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 25, 2011 Report Share Posted March 25, 2011 Depending upon the lab, “normal†can be different with each one. For example, my test revealed a normal range of 44.0 – 76.0 which is still higher but not by much but then again even high normal is high. Yet another uses a different ‘normal’. Things change so quickly one needs ore than one test to determine where they are or follow up tests to determine really out of range results.. For example my previous blood work indicated Anemia in my results while my latest had me in the ‘normal range’. ?? We can say white blood cells are high, but when you check your CBC the White Blood Count is in the normal range. Have you discussed these results with the person that ordered the tests to get their take on it? Joe C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2011 Report Share Posted March 26, 2011 Thanks : I am having to learn new terms. Yes the temp is the concern and is being monitored. So far the temp has not gone high enough to require hospitalization. Vic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2011 Report Share Posted March 26, 2011 vincent good observation and a point   ________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2011 Report Share Posted March 26, 2011 I find it strange that it would be grate if  temp can be one way our immune systerm could fight cancer as no cancer can live in temp highter then 107f (32c) but a temp of above 105 will kill us A fever of 105 or 106, even if it does not kill you, can leave you with permanent brain damage. Yes, fevers can be serious. ________________________________ From: Victor Swiercz <roadmst1@...> Sent: Sat, 26 March, 2011 10:21:15 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Question about blood test.  Thanks : I am having to learn new terms. Yes the temp is the concern and is being monitored. So far the temp has not gone high enough to require hospitalization. Vic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2011 Report Share Posted March 26, 2011 Fever is usually a beneficial process of the body’s defense mechanism. From what I have learned and watched and read about, it is the ‘heroic’ efforts by people or physicians to suppress the fever that results in problems. It is an established fact, not my theory that fever is usually beneficial not deleterious. As for the 105 degrees? On more than once occasion my children and a nephew that we are caring for reached 105 and they were bed rested with no food and only distilled water until the fever broke. This is not for everyone because if one wants to listen to the medical ‘exspurts’ (spelling intended) most would have you lower any temperature instead of allowing it to do what it does best.....help us get well provided we do not suppress it. Think Hyperthermia. When we do the right thing, in most situation, the fever is not going to rise to that level and, you don’t find the old and feeble developing fevers that high because they don’t have the vitality for the body to work that well. Always think bodily defense. Any outward sign of illness such as profuse mucous, fever, sweating, coughing, sneezing, diarrhea are not symptoms of disease, they are signs the body is trying to help itself and we must let it, not suppress it. This is an entirely different thought process than we have been raised with or taught by Conventional Medicine. When I was a child I remember the very cold alcohol wash-downs to lower my temperature. Foolishness, but that was many moons ago and who thought about alcohol being itself a problem or that they were actually fighting the body. How we survived childhood is a miracle of the body, not Medical science? Regardless, the fever is a sign that there is a problem but if we want body temperature raised by Hyperthermia, why do we condemn a fever when the body does it? How about bed-rest, no food, just pure water for a couple of days? Not talking prolonged fast here, just a couple of days to allow one’s body to get well. Keep in mind, there is no disease or outside factor that ‘causes’ fever...........only the body can cause a fever as a reaction to a stimuli and the day your body cannot provide a fever when needed.....you’re probably heading for the grave. Joe C. .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.