Guest guest Posted February 24, 2009 Report Share Posted February 24, 2009 Welcome, Mr. Castronovo My Subscriptions - My Alerts - My Profile - Logout Search This PeriodicalPeriodicals + MEDLINEPeriodicalsMEDLINEfor Advanced Search - MEDLINE - My Recent Searches - My Saved Searches - Search Tips JOURNAL HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARTICLES IN PRESS BROWSE ALL ISSUES SEARCH THIS JOURNAL PAPER HIGHLIGHTS SPECIAL ISSUES JOURNAL INFORMATION • Aims and Scope • Editorial Board • Author Information • Abstracting/Indexing • Contact Information • Society Information • Pricing Information ONLINE SUBMISSION SUBSCRIBE TO JOURNAL ADVERTISING INFORMATION RSS More periodicals: FIND A PERIODICAL FIND A PORTAL GO TO PRODUCT CATALOG Volume 43, Issue 11, Pages 1701-1712 (July 2007) ABSTRACT FULL TEXT FULL-TEXT PDF (184 KB) CITATION ALERT CITED BY RELATED ARTICLES EXPORT CITATION EMAIL TO A COLLEAGUE REPRINTS/PERMISSIONS BOOKMARK ARTICLE FULL TEXT ELSEWHERE Does solar exposure, as indicated by the non-melanoma skin cancers, protect from solid cancers: Vitamin D as a possible explanation Pentti Tuohimaaa, Eero Pukkalab, Ghislaine Scéloc, n H. Olsend, H. Brewstere, Kari Hemminkifg, Traceyh, bete Weiderpassij, h V. Kliewerkl, Vera Pompe-Kirnm, L. McBriden, Carmen Martoso,Kee-Seng Chiap, Jon M. Tonitaq, Jon G. Jonassonrs, Paolo Boffettac, Brennanc Received 27 February 2007; received in revised form 13 April 2007; accepted 19 April 2007. published online 31 May 2007. Abstract Background Skin cancers are known to be associated with sun exposure, whereas sunlight through the production of vitaminD may protect against some cancers. The aim of this study was to assess whether patients with skin cancer have an altered risk of developing other cancers. Methods The study cohort consisted of 416,134 cases of skin cancer and 3,776,501 cases of non-skin cancer as a first cancer extracted from 13 cancer registries. 10,886 melanoma and 35,620 non-melanoma skin cancer cases had second cancers. The observed numbers (O) of 46 types of second primary cancer after skin melanoma, basal cell carcinoma or non-basal cell carcinoma, and of skin cancers following non-skin cancers were compared to the expected numbers (E) derived from the age, sex and calendar period specific cancer incidence rates in each of the cancer registries (O/E=SIR, standardised incidence ratios). Rates from cancer registries classified to sunny countries (Australia, Singapore and Spain) and less sunny countries (Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Scotland, Slovenia and Sweden) were compared to each other. Results SIR of all second solid primary cancers (except skin and lip) after skin melanoma were significantly lower for the sunny countries (SIR(S)=1.03; 95% CI 0.99–1.08) than in the less sunny countries (SIR(L)=1.14; 95%CI 1.11–1.17). The difference was more obvious after non-melanoma skin cancers: after basal cell carcinoma SIR(S)/SIR(L)=0.65 (95%CI=0.58–0.72); after non-basal cell carcinoma SIR(S)/SIR(L)=0.58 (95%CI=0.50–0.67). In sunny countries, the risk of second primary cancer after non-melanoma skin cancers was lower for most of the cancers except for lip, mouth and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Conclusions Vitamin D production in the skin seems to decrease the risk of several solid cancers (especially stomach, colorectal, liver and gallbladder, pancreas, lung, female breast, prostate, bladder and kidney cancers). The apparently protective effect of sun exposure against second primary cancer is more pronounced after non-melanoma skin cancers than melanoma, which is consistent with earlier reports that non-melanoma skin cancers reflect cumulative sun exposure, whereas melanoma is more related to sunburn. Keywords: Skin cancer, Second cancer, Vitamin D, Epidemiology, Prevention, Solar UV-B It is clear that we need exposure to the sun, never allowing sunburning, but seeking full body sun exposure for 15- 20 minutes daily....without sun screen. The alternative? A high quality Vitamin D3 supplement. JC A not so sunny quote: " I sincerely believe... that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale. " -- Jefferson to , 1816. ME 15:23 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.